Motivation Strategies for Learning and Their Influences in Students' Feedback Literacy During Undergraduate Medical School: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1
Ligia Cordovani, Susan M Jack, Anne Wong, Sandra Monteiro
{"title":"Motivation Strategies for Learning and Their Influences in Students' Feedback Literacy During Undergraduate Medical School: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Ligia Cordovani, Susan M Jack, Anne Wong, Sandra Monteiro","doi":"10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feedback from educators to students is considered an important and essential element of effective learning in medical education. Feedback literacy is the process in which a student receives, comprehends, accepts, and makes use of feedback. Factors affecting medical students' feedback literacy include students' characteristics, motivation, abilities in self-assessment, emotional reactions to feedback, and maturity. To generate a deeper understanding of this phenomenon, a sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted to measure students' motivational orientations and explore their strategies towards learning, how these orientations and strategies are related to students' feedback literacy, and how this relationship changes as students progress through a Canadian medical school. In the first quantitative phase, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was administered to first- and last-year medical students at a Canadian university to measure their motivational orientations for learning and learning strategies. Using the quantitative results (<i>N</i> = 58) to develop a sampling strategy for the second phase, individuals with different motivational orientations and learning strategies were identified based on their questionnaires' scores. This purposeful sample (<i>N</i> = 15) was then invited to participate in the second explanatory phase of this study, where a qualitative description approach was applied. We conducted semi-structured interviews with students, divided into two groups: those who through the measurement of 4.62 or below by the MSLQ were identified as having a low motivational orientation for learning (<i>n</i> = 4), and those who through the measurement of 5.34 or above by the MSLQ were identified as having a high motivational orientation for learning (<i>n</i> = 3). Participants' views were explored and synthesized, with the intent for these findings to further explain how medical students' learning motivations and strategies might influence feedback literacy. The integration of findings showed that five factors could be taken into consideration when improving students' feedback literacy skills: learning goal orientation, self-regulation, help seeking, personality traits, and learning experience. Based on those factors, we identified some approaches that could allow the students to enhance their own feedback literacy. Feedback literacy could empower students to have more control over the feedback process and help them to overcome the barriers they still face during the feedback process.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 3","pages":"1345-1359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feedback from educators to students is considered an important and essential element of effective learning in medical education. Feedback literacy is the process in which a student receives, comprehends, accepts, and makes use of feedback. Factors affecting medical students' feedback literacy include students' characteristics, motivation, abilities in self-assessment, emotional reactions to feedback, and maturity. To generate a deeper understanding of this phenomenon, a sequential explanatory mixed methods study was conducted to measure students' motivational orientations and explore their strategies towards learning, how these orientations and strategies are related to students' feedback literacy, and how this relationship changes as students progress through a Canadian medical school. In the first quantitative phase, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was administered to first- and last-year medical students at a Canadian university to measure their motivational orientations for learning and learning strategies. Using the quantitative results (N = 58) to develop a sampling strategy for the second phase, individuals with different motivational orientations and learning strategies were identified based on their questionnaires' scores. This purposeful sample (N = 15) was then invited to participate in the second explanatory phase of this study, where a qualitative description approach was applied. We conducted semi-structured interviews with students, divided into two groups: those who through the measurement of 4.62 or below by the MSLQ were identified as having a low motivational orientation for learning (n = 4), and those who through the measurement of 5.34 or above by the MSLQ were identified as having a high motivational orientation for learning (n = 3). Participants' views were explored and synthesized, with the intent for these findings to further explain how medical students' learning motivations and strategies might influence feedback literacy. The integration of findings showed that five factors could be taken into consideration when improving students' feedback literacy skills: learning goal orientation, self-regulation, help seeking, personality traits, and learning experience. Based on those factors, we identified some approaches that could allow the students to enhance their own feedback literacy. Feedback literacy could empower students to have more control over the feedback process and help them to overcome the barriers they still face during the feedback process.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1.

医学本科学习动机策略及其对学生反馈素养的影响:解释性序贯混合方法研究
教育工作者对学生的反馈被认为是医学教育中有效学习的重要和基本要素。反馈素养是学生接收、理解、接受和利用反馈的过程。医学生反馈素养的影响因素包括学生的特点、动机、自我评价能力、反馈情绪反应和成熟度。为了更深入地理解这一现象,我们采用顺序解释性混合方法研究了学生的动机取向,并探讨了他们的学习策略,这些取向和策略如何与学生的反馈素养相关,以及随着学生在加拿大医学院的学习进展,这种关系如何变化。在第一个量化阶段,对加拿大一所大学的一年级和四年级医学生实施了学习动机策略问卷(MSLQ),以衡量他们的学习动机取向和学习策略。利用定量结果(N = 58)制定第二阶段的抽样策略,根据问卷得分确定具有不同动机取向和学习策略的个体。这个有目的的样本(N = 15)随后被邀请参加本研究的第二个解释阶段,其中应用了定性描述方法。我们对学生进行了半结构化访谈,分为两组:通过MSLQ测量值为4.62或以下的学生被确定为具有低学习动机倾向(n = 4),通过MSLQ测量值为5.34或以上的学生被确定为具有高学习动机倾向(n = 3)。研究人员对参与者的观点进行了探讨和综合,旨在进一步解释医学生的学习动机和策略如何影响反馈素养。综合研究结果发现,提高学生的反馈素养需要考虑五个因素:学习目标导向、自我调节、求助、人格特质和学习体验。基于这些因素,我们确定了一些方法,可以让学生提高自己的反馈素养。反馈素养可以使学生对反馈过程有更多的控制,并帮助他们克服在反馈过程中仍然面临的障碍。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40670-025-02310-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信