Jason S Hedrick, Charles Panzarella, Scott Cottrell, Betsy Goebel Jones, Nicole J Borges, Raymond H Curry, Norman D Ferrari
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Departments of Medical Education at Four LCME Accredited Schools.","authors":"Jason S Hedrick, Charles Panzarella, Scott Cottrell, Betsy Goebel Jones, Nicole J Borges, Raymond H Curry, Norman D Ferrari","doi":"10.1007/s40670-025-02321-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The authors sought to determine common features, challenges, and benefits of departments of medical education (DMEs) at LCME accredited medical schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors utilized a multi-case case study approach to examine each department. Data were compiled in a constant comparative methodology, which included an iterative peer reviewing process by the researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Financial resources were similar at the DMEs, relying on allocations from varied sources, including tuition. Two departments were the home for faculty teaching in the MD program-particularly the basic/foundational sciences. Two provided some teaching for MD students but had other primary roles. One included teaching in graduate programs and another being a home for MD degree faculty administrators in the undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results inform plans to develop a DME, which should be distinguished to align with an institution's mission and needs. DMEs serve as a home for faculty contributing to the educational mission and provide a route for medical educators to seek promotion/tenure outside of traditional departments. DMEs provide synergies to innovate, produce educational scholarship, and access resources for medical educator faculty development. Challenges include finding a physical home and fitting into traditional department frameworks. DMEs are often subjected to administrative resource allocation. Leaders may need to seek alternative funding. Future studies should consider a comprehensive analysis that would significantly provide greater details and a clearer picture into DMEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 3","pages":"1693-1705"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02321-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The authors sought to determine common features, challenges, and benefits of departments of medical education (DMEs) at LCME accredited medical schools.
Methods: The authors utilized a multi-case case study approach to examine each department. Data were compiled in a constant comparative methodology, which included an iterative peer reviewing process by the researchers.
Results: Financial resources were similar at the DMEs, relying on allocations from varied sources, including tuition. Two departments were the home for faculty teaching in the MD program-particularly the basic/foundational sciences. Two provided some teaching for MD students but had other primary roles. One included teaching in graduate programs and another being a home for MD degree faculty administrators in the undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education programs.
Conclusions: The results inform plans to develop a DME, which should be distinguished to align with an institution's mission and needs. DMEs serve as a home for faculty contributing to the educational mission and provide a route for medical educators to seek promotion/tenure outside of traditional departments. DMEs provide synergies to innovate, produce educational scholarship, and access resources for medical educator faculty development. Challenges include finding a physical home and fitting into traditional department frameworks. DMEs are often subjected to administrative resource allocation. Leaders may need to seek alternative funding. Future studies should consider a comprehensive analysis that would significantly provide greater details and a clearer picture into DMEs.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.