A Tale of Two Institutions: Implementing IPE Curricula and Assessment Tools.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-025-02281-3
Kathryn K Neill, Chad Lairamore, Wendy L Ward
{"title":"A Tale of Two Institutions: Implementing IPE Curricula and Assessment Tools.","authors":"Kathryn K Neill, Chad Lairamore, Wendy L Ward","doi":"10.1007/s40670-025-02281-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interprofessional education (IPE) benefits are well-established, yet methods for implementing such programs vary greatly. This study compares infrastructure, curriculum, evaluation procedures, and insights from over a decade of IPE implementation at two institutions. Both saw evolution of common curriculum frameworks and evaluation metrics. However, a centralized administrative approach outperformed a grassroots approach for developing capacity for IPE uptake, as indicated by higher scores on the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Institutional Assessment Instrument. These experiences facilitated formation of a statewide IPE consortium. The authors urge others to consider these findings when implementing IPE curricula, contributing to the collective knowledge base on effective IPE models.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 3","pages":"1637-1654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02281-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) benefits are well-established, yet methods for implementing such programs vary greatly. This study compares infrastructure, curriculum, evaluation procedures, and insights from over a decade of IPE implementation at two institutions. Both saw evolution of common curriculum frameworks and evaluation metrics. However, a centralized administrative approach outperformed a grassroots approach for developing capacity for IPE uptake, as indicated by higher scores on the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Institutional Assessment Instrument. These experiences facilitated formation of a statewide IPE consortium. The authors urge others to consider these findings when implementing IPE curricula, contributing to the collective knowledge base on effective IPE models.

两个机构的故事:实施IPE课程和评估工具。
跨专业教育(IPE)的好处是公认的,但实施这些计划的方法差异很大。本研究比较了基础设施、课程、评估程序,以及两所机构十多年来IPE实施的见解。两者都见证了共同课程框架和评估指标的演变。然而,从跨专业教育合作(IPEC)机构评估工具的得分来看,中央管理方法在发展国际政治经济学吸收能力方面优于基层方法。这些经验促进了全州IPE联盟的形成。作者敦促其他人在实施国际政治经济学课程时考虑这些发现,为有效的国际政治经济学模型提供集体知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信