A Comparative Study of Attitude and Perception of Students to the Online Learning of Anatomy in a Low-Resource Settings During COVID-19.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-025-02295-x
M O Alese, O D Bamisi, B O Ibitoye, A O Oladokun, K S Oluwadiya
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Attitude and Perception of Students to the Online Learning of Anatomy in a Low-Resource Settings During COVID-19.","authors":"M O Alese, O D Bamisi, B O Ibitoye, A O Oladokun, K S Oluwadiya","doi":"10.1007/s40670-025-02295-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A large amount of anatomy teaching is based on practical sessions.This could be a challenge with online learning which has become inevitable in the COVID-19 era as the practicality of teaching could be limited. This study sought to analyze the perception of students to the online learning of anatomy in a low-resource setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Previously validated questionnaires were used to assess the availability, feasibility, effectiveness, acceptability, and receptiveness to different teaching modalities in Anatomy in public and private universities in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that there was a significant increase in the availability of resources in the private institution compared to the public. In our study, genetics, embryology, and surface anatomy were considered most feasible to learn by the students. Genetics, embryology, and histology were perceived as absolutely effective in the virtual learning of anatomy, while gross anatomy, clinical anatomy, and radiological anatomy were perceived as not effective. The result showed a generally low receptiveness to learning all branches of anatomy online, with 243 (44.7%) students not being receptive, while 177 (32.5%) students were receptive. Also, 232 (42.6%) felt they were not equipped with the technological skills to learn all branches of anatomy online as against 185 (34.0%) who said they were technologically equipped.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study showed a variation in the perception and attitude of students in public and private schools towards the online learning of anatomy. Of great importance is the availability of infrastructure. Overall, in a low-resourced setting, traditional teaching of anatomy is more widely accepted compared to online learning due to many factors. The availability of facilities for virtual learning is important for students to keep up with global standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 3","pages":"1249-1258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02295-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A large amount of anatomy teaching is based on practical sessions.This could be a challenge with online learning which has become inevitable in the COVID-19 era as the practicality of teaching could be limited. This study sought to analyze the perception of students to the online learning of anatomy in a low-resource setting.

Method: Previously validated questionnaires were used to assess the availability, feasibility, effectiveness, acceptability, and receptiveness to different teaching modalities in Anatomy in public and private universities in Nigeria.

Results: Our results show that there was a significant increase in the availability of resources in the private institution compared to the public. In our study, genetics, embryology, and surface anatomy were considered most feasible to learn by the students. Genetics, embryology, and histology were perceived as absolutely effective in the virtual learning of anatomy, while gross anatomy, clinical anatomy, and radiological anatomy were perceived as not effective. The result showed a generally low receptiveness to learning all branches of anatomy online, with 243 (44.7%) students not being receptive, while 177 (32.5%) students were receptive. Also, 232 (42.6%) felt they were not equipped with the technological skills to learn all branches of anatomy online as against 185 (34.0%) who said they were technologically equipped.

Conclusion: The study showed a variation in the perception and attitude of students in public and private schools towards the online learning of anatomy. Of great importance is the availability of infrastructure. Overall, in a low-resourced setting, traditional teaching of anatomy is more widely accepted compared to online learning due to many factors. The availability of facilities for virtual learning is important for students to keep up with global standards.

新冠肺炎疫情期间低资源环境下学生对解剖学在线学习态度和认知的比较研究
背景:大量的解剖学教学是基于实践环节。这对于新冠肺炎时代不可避免的在线学习来说是一个挑战,因为教学的实用性可能会受到限制。本研究旨在分析低资源环境下学生对解剖学在线学习的看法。方法:采用事先验证过的调查问卷,评估尼日利亚公立和私立大学解剖学不同教学模式的可得性、可行性、有效性、可接受性和可接受性。结果:我们的研究结果表明,与公立机构相比,私立机构的资源可用性显著增加。在我们的研究中,遗传学、胚胎学和表面解剖学被认为是最适合学生学习的。遗传学、胚胎学和组织学在解剖学的虚拟学习中被认为是绝对有效的,而大体解剖学、临床解剖学和放射学解剖学被认为是无效的。结果显示,学生对在线学习解剖学所有分支的接受度普遍较低,243名(44.7%)学生不接受,177名(32.5%)学生接受。此外,232人(42.6%)认为自己不具备在线学习所有解剖学分支的技术能力,而185人(34.0%)认为自己具备技术能力。结论:本研究显示公立和私立学校学生对解剖学在线学习的认知和态度存在差异。基础设施的可用性是非常重要的。总的来说,在资源匮乏的环境下,由于许多因素,传统的解剖学教学比在线学习更被广泛接受。虚拟学习设施的可用性对于学生跟上全球标准非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信