Moein Eskandari, Ayat Heydar-Abdolamir Alkhafaji, Abdulridha Mohammed Al-Asady, Hamideh Naimi, Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Amir Avan, Hassan Vossoughinia, Ali Mehri, Mikhail Ryzhikov, Majid Khazaei, Mitra Ahadi, Seyed Mahdi Hassanian
{"title":"Mebendazole as an Adjunct Therapy with Mesalamine to Increase Efficacy and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Moein Eskandari, Ayat Heydar-Abdolamir Alkhafaji, Abdulridha Mohammed Al-Asady, Hamideh Naimi, Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Amir Avan, Hassan Vossoughinia, Ali Mehri, Mikhail Ryzhikov, Majid Khazaei, Mitra Ahadi, Seyed Mahdi Hassanian","doi":"10.2174/0113816128372513250616182826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disorder of the large intestine characterized by inflammation in the mucosal tissue of the colon and rectal area. In the present pilot study, we assessed the efficacy of combining mebendazole with mesalamine in moderate UC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present exploratory pilot trial, designed to assess both the safety and preliminary efficacy of mebendazole, a total number of 10 moderate UC patients with Mayo scores ranging from 6 to 9 were enrolled. The participants were divided into two groups at random and were treated with 3 gr mesalamine per day plus 300 mg/day mebendazole or matching placebo for 3 months. The efficacy of treatment was assessed in 8 and 12-week timelines with Mayo score. Moreover, the safety of the given dose of mebendazole in UC patients was also assessed by laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of mebendazole to the mesalamine in the treatment regimen of patients suffering from UC caused a greater decrease in the Mayo score of the patients compared to the mesalamine monotherapy at 8 and 12-week timelines. Despite this trend, statistical significance was not reached, likely due to the limited sample size. Moreover, all the patients in the mebendazole group experienced clinical remission at the 12-week timeline, but 4 of 5 patients in the placebo group experienced a clinical remission state, indicating that mebendazole caused a 20% increase in the clinical remission rate. As indicated by the results of the laboratory tests, the given dose of mebendazole showed no toxicity in the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of mebendazole to mesalamine for UC treatment appears to be a safe and potentially beneficial approach to enhance mesalamine's efficacy and reduce clinical symptoms. However, given the small sample size and the short study duration, further large-scale, long-term trials are necessary to validate these preliminary findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>IRCT20220115053713N2.</p>","PeriodicalId":10845,"journal":{"name":"Current pharmaceutical design","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current pharmaceutical design","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128372513250616182826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disorder of the large intestine characterized by inflammation in the mucosal tissue of the colon and rectal area. In the present pilot study, we assessed the efficacy of combining mebendazole with mesalamine in moderate UC patients.
Methods: In the present exploratory pilot trial, designed to assess both the safety and preliminary efficacy of mebendazole, a total number of 10 moderate UC patients with Mayo scores ranging from 6 to 9 were enrolled. The participants were divided into two groups at random and were treated with 3 gr mesalamine per day plus 300 mg/day mebendazole or matching placebo for 3 months. The efficacy of treatment was assessed in 8 and 12-week timelines with Mayo score. Moreover, the safety of the given dose of mebendazole in UC patients was also assessed by laboratory tests.
Results: The addition of mebendazole to the mesalamine in the treatment regimen of patients suffering from UC caused a greater decrease in the Mayo score of the patients compared to the mesalamine monotherapy at 8 and 12-week timelines. Despite this trend, statistical significance was not reached, likely due to the limited sample size. Moreover, all the patients in the mebendazole group experienced clinical remission at the 12-week timeline, but 4 of 5 patients in the placebo group experienced a clinical remission state, indicating that mebendazole caused a 20% increase in the clinical remission rate. As indicated by the results of the laboratory tests, the given dose of mebendazole showed no toxicity in the patients.
Conclusion: The addition of mebendazole to mesalamine for UC treatment appears to be a safe and potentially beneficial approach to enhance mesalamine's efficacy and reduce clinical symptoms. However, given the small sample size and the short study duration, further large-scale, long-term trials are necessary to validate these preliminary findings.
期刊介绍:
Current Pharmaceutical Design publishes timely in-depth reviews and research articles from leading pharmaceutical researchers in the field, covering all aspects of current research in rational drug design. Each issue is devoted to a single major therapeutic area guest edited by an acknowledged authority in the field.
Each thematic issue of Current Pharmaceutical Design covers all subject areas of major importance to modern drug design including: medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug targets and disease mechanism.