Guided by Expectations: Overweighted Semantic Priors in Schizotypy and their Links to Glutamate.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Franziska Knolle, Elisabeth F Sterner, Verena F Demler, Lucy J MacGregor, Christoph Mathys
{"title":"Guided by Expectations: Overweighted Semantic Priors in Schizotypy and their Links to Glutamate.","authors":"Franziska Knolle, Elisabeth F Sterner, Verena F Demler, Lucy J MacGregor, Christoph Mathys","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.06.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An imbalance in the weighting of prior beliefs and sensory evidence is thought to contribute to the development of psychotic symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions. We investigated (1) how much individuals with schizotypal traits, a subclinical expression of psychosis-proneness, use high-level semantic priors and sensory evidence to understand noise-degraded language; (2) whether an imbalance would potentially result in task-based hallucinations - perceptions that match expectations but not the input; and finally (2) whether an potential imbalance was linked to altered levels of cortical glutamate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a language comprehension task, we simultaneously manipulated semantic predictability, sensory degradation and surprisal to estimate the prior weight using a Bayesian Belief updating model. We conducted two studies. Study 1 (n=109) tested the language comprehension task behaviourally; study 2 (n=55) was used to replicate the findings of study 1; but was furthermore combined with 1H-Magnetresonance spectroscopy to assess cortical levels of glutamate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 showed that high-level priors were overweighted with increasing schizotypy providing a potential explanation for the increased number of task-based hallucination observed in the same individuals. Importantly, study 2 (n=55), replicating the results of study 1, revealed that an overweighting of priors was associated with increased cingulate glutamate, providing a neurobiological basis for over-reliance on top-down predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results offer a mechanistic and neurobiological understanding of how predictive coding alterations contribute to symptom development along the psychosis spectrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.06.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An imbalance in the weighting of prior beliefs and sensory evidence is thought to contribute to the development of psychotic symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions. We investigated (1) how much individuals with schizotypal traits, a subclinical expression of psychosis-proneness, use high-level semantic priors and sensory evidence to understand noise-degraded language; (2) whether an imbalance would potentially result in task-based hallucinations - perceptions that match expectations but not the input; and finally (2) whether an potential imbalance was linked to altered levels of cortical glutamate.

Methods: In a language comprehension task, we simultaneously manipulated semantic predictability, sensory degradation and surprisal to estimate the prior weight using a Bayesian Belief updating model. We conducted two studies. Study 1 (n=109) tested the language comprehension task behaviourally; study 2 (n=55) was used to replicate the findings of study 1; but was furthermore combined with 1H-Magnetresonance spectroscopy to assess cortical levels of glutamate.

Results: Study 1 showed that high-level priors were overweighted with increasing schizotypy providing a potential explanation for the increased number of task-based hallucination observed in the same individuals. Importantly, study 2 (n=55), replicating the results of study 1, revealed that an overweighting of priors was associated with increased cingulate glutamate, providing a neurobiological basis for over-reliance on top-down predictions.

Conclusion: These results offer a mechanistic and neurobiological understanding of how predictive coding alterations contribute to symptom development along the psychosis spectrum.

由期望引导:分裂型的过度语义先验及其与谷氨酸的联系。
背景:先验信念和感官证据权重的不平衡被认为是导致精神病症状(如幻觉和妄想)发展的原因。我们调查了(1)有多少具有分裂型特征的个体(精神倾向的亚临床表现)使用高级语义先验和感官证据来理解噪声退化语言;(2)这种不平衡是否会潜在地导致基于任务的幻觉——与期望相符但与输入不符的感知;最后(2)潜在的失衡是否与皮质谷氨酸水平的改变有关。方法:在语言理解任务中,采用贝叶斯信念更新模型,同时对语义可预测性、感觉退化和惊讶性进行处理,估计先验权重。我们进行了两项研究。研究1 (n=109)测试了语言理解任务的行为;研究2 (n=55)用于重复研究1的结果;并进一步结合1h磁共振波谱来评估皮层谷氨酸水平。结果:研究1表明,高水平的先验与分裂型的增加有关,这为在同一个体中观察到的基于任务的幻觉数量增加提供了潜在的解释。重要的是,研究2 (n=55)重复了研究1的结果,揭示了先验的权重过高与扣带谷氨酸增加有关,为过度依赖自上而下的预测提供了神经生物学基础。结论:这些结果提供了一个机制和神经生物学的理解如何预测性编码改变有助于症状发展沿精神病谱系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信