Diverse paths of green building development from a stakeholder collaboration perspective

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Dongming Gu , Xiaofei Hu , Jianing Zhang , Meiling Chen
{"title":"Diverse paths of green building development from a stakeholder collaboration perspective","authors":"Dongming Gu ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Hu ,&nbsp;Jianing Zhang ,&nbsp;Meiling Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Promoting green building development (GBD) is of great significance for China’s achievement of “dual-carbon” strategic goals. The improvement paths of GBD and their mechanisms remain unclear, especially from a stakeholder collaboration perspective. This study integrated the stakeholder theory to develop a novel quadruple helix theoretical model for GBD. We examined data from 13 prefecture-level cities from 2011 to 2020 in Jiangsu Province, China, and explored the paths of GBD using necessary condition analysis and dynamic qualitative comparative analysis. These results indicated that no single condition was indispensable for achieving GBD. Four distinct configurations of conditions collectively contributed to high levels of GBD: government-industry collaboration, government-academia collaboration, balanced government-industry-academia collaboration, and multiple collaboration. Over time, the explanatory power of these configurations increased throughout the study period. Spatially, the configurations exhibited varying preferences across different regions. Additionally, the pathways for achieving different star ratings for green buildings were significantly divergent. Public concern and industry scale emerged as critical factors in attaining high-star GBD. These findings elucidate the complex interactions among green building stakeholders and offer valuable insights into further enhancing GBD in complex and dynamic environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 116115"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877882500845X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Promoting green building development (GBD) is of great significance for China’s achievement of “dual-carbon” strategic goals. The improvement paths of GBD and their mechanisms remain unclear, especially from a stakeholder collaboration perspective. This study integrated the stakeholder theory to develop a novel quadruple helix theoretical model for GBD. We examined data from 13 prefecture-level cities from 2011 to 2020 in Jiangsu Province, China, and explored the paths of GBD using necessary condition analysis and dynamic qualitative comparative analysis. These results indicated that no single condition was indispensable for achieving GBD. Four distinct configurations of conditions collectively contributed to high levels of GBD: government-industry collaboration, government-academia collaboration, balanced government-industry-academia collaboration, and multiple collaboration. Over time, the explanatory power of these configurations increased throughout the study period. Spatially, the configurations exhibited varying preferences across different regions. Additionally, the pathways for achieving different star ratings for green buildings were significantly divergent. Public concern and industry scale emerged as critical factors in attaining high-star GBD. These findings elucidate the complex interactions among green building stakeholders and offer valuable insights into further enhancing GBD in complex and dynamic environments.
利益相关者合作视角下绿色建筑发展的多种路径
推进绿色建筑发展对中国实现“双碳”战略目标具有重要意义。GBD的改进路径及其机制尚不清楚,特别是从利益相关者协作的角度来看。本研究结合利益相关者理论,建立了一种新的GBD四螺旋理论模型。本文以江苏省13个地级市2011 - 2020年的数据为研究对象,采用必要条件分析和动态定性比较分析方法,探讨了城市发展的路径。这些结果表明,实现GBD没有单一的条件是必不可少的。四种不同的条件配置共同促成了高水平的GBD:政府-行业合作、政府-学术界合作、平衡的政府-行业-学术界合作和多重合作。随着时间的推移,这些结构的解释力在整个研究期间增加了。在空间上,不同区域的配置表现出不同的偏好。此外,绿色建筑获得不同星级评级的途径也存在显著差异。公众关注和行业规模成为实现高星级GBD的关键因素。这些发现阐明了绿色建筑利益相关者之间复杂的相互作用,并为在复杂和动态环境中进一步加强GBD提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信