Nataliia Kozhemiako, Carol Mita, Georgia M Panagiotaropoulou, Katie Js Lewis, Tamar Sofer, Shaun M Purcell
{"title":"The Interplay Between Sleep and Mental Health: A Genetic Perspective.","authors":"Nataliia Kozhemiako, Carol Mita, Georgia M Panagiotaropoulou, Katie Js Lewis, Tamar Sofer, Shaun M Purcell","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although many facets of sleep, including subjective, behavioral and neurophysiological features, are closely linked with psychiatric disorders, the natures of these relationships are generally unclear. A given alteration in sleep could reflect a cause (that may mediate genetic risk), consequence, symptom, trigger, epiphenomenon due to shared determinants, or some combination of these. Genetic approaches can in principle be informative: i) by identifying specific genetic influences on disease mediated by or shared with sleep, which could help the search for biological mechanisms and therapeutic targets; ii) by providing evidence for causality, which could suggest interventions for modifiable sleep traits. Here, we summarize recent human quantitative and molecular genetic studies on sleep and psychiatric disease, including twin and genome-wide association studies. Despite evidence for shared heritability across many domains, notably depression and insomnia, the field is in its early stages and faces significant challenges: i) putative causal effects are small, phenotypically non-specific, not resolved to specific gene pathways and often bidirectional; ii) most current discovery cohorts are demographically biased and do not capture profound age-related changes in sleep and its genetic architecture; iii) group-level analyses ignore patient-to-patient heterogeneity, including the presence or absence of specific sleep alterations; iv) a paucity of objective, brain-based data in genetically-informative samples hampers making connections with sleep neurophysiology. Nonetheless, as ever-growing genetic tools and resources still hold great potential for translational bridges between basic model-systems, human epidemiology and personalized clinical care, genetic approaches will still likely be needed to reveal sleep's roles in maintaining mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.06.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although many facets of sleep, including subjective, behavioral and neurophysiological features, are closely linked with psychiatric disorders, the natures of these relationships are generally unclear. A given alteration in sleep could reflect a cause (that may mediate genetic risk), consequence, symptom, trigger, epiphenomenon due to shared determinants, or some combination of these. Genetic approaches can in principle be informative: i) by identifying specific genetic influences on disease mediated by or shared with sleep, which could help the search for biological mechanisms and therapeutic targets; ii) by providing evidence for causality, which could suggest interventions for modifiable sleep traits. Here, we summarize recent human quantitative and molecular genetic studies on sleep and psychiatric disease, including twin and genome-wide association studies. Despite evidence for shared heritability across many domains, notably depression and insomnia, the field is in its early stages and faces significant challenges: i) putative causal effects are small, phenotypically non-specific, not resolved to specific gene pathways and often bidirectional; ii) most current discovery cohorts are demographically biased and do not capture profound age-related changes in sleep and its genetic architecture; iii) group-level analyses ignore patient-to-patient heterogeneity, including the presence or absence of specific sleep alterations; iv) a paucity of objective, brain-based data in genetically-informative samples hampers making connections with sleep neurophysiology. Nonetheless, as ever-growing genetic tools and resources still hold great potential for translational bridges between basic model-systems, human epidemiology and personalized clinical care, genetic approaches will still likely be needed to reveal sleep's roles in maintaining mental health.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.