Csaba Kazinczi, Noemi Szepfalusi, Viola Luca Nemeth, Adrienn Holczer, Katalin Jakab, Laszlo Vecsei, Peter Klivenyi, Anita Must, Mihaly Racsmany
{"title":"The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Inhibitory Control Training on Working Memory in Post-stroke Rehabilitation.","authors":"Csaba Kazinczi, Noemi Szepfalusi, Viola Luca Nemeth, Adrienn Holczer, Katalin Jakab, Laszlo Vecsei, Peter Klivenyi, Anita Must, Mihaly Racsmany","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The impairment of working memory is a common phenomenon after stroke and critically affects daily functioning. Transcranial direct current stimulation and computer- based cognitive training are widely used in neurorehabilitation to enhance cognitive functions. This study examined the single vs combined effect of anodal stimulation and computer-based inhibitory control training on working memory function among post-stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five participants were randomly allocated to receiving either active stimulation, sham stimulation with training, or active stimulation with training. Forward/ Backward Digit Span Task, Listening Span Task, Corsi Block Tapping Task, and Trail Making Test were used to assess working memory functions at baseline and after the ten-session experimental program. For statistical analysis, we performed a Linear Mixed-effects Model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant group-by-time interaction showed in favour of the combined group over the active stimulation group in the case of forward digit span (p=.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicate that cognitive training and stimulation solely did not lead to significant improvements in working memory related functions among post-stroke patients. However, the combined application may be favourable. The effectiveness of cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation needs further examination. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2025; 27(2): 88-105)</p>","PeriodicalId":39762,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","volume":"27 2","pages":"88-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The impairment of working memory is a common phenomenon after stroke and critically affects daily functioning. Transcranial direct current stimulation and computer- based cognitive training are widely used in neurorehabilitation to enhance cognitive functions. This study examined the single vs combined effect of anodal stimulation and computer-based inhibitory control training on working memory function among post-stroke patients.
Methods: Thirty-five participants were randomly allocated to receiving either active stimulation, sham stimulation with training, or active stimulation with training. Forward/ Backward Digit Span Task, Listening Span Task, Corsi Block Tapping Task, and Trail Making Test were used to assess working memory functions at baseline and after the ten-session experimental program. For statistical analysis, we performed a Linear Mixed-effects Model.
Results: A significant group-by-time interaction showed in favour of the combined group over the active stimulation group in the case of forward digit span (p=.028).
Conclusion: Results indicate that cognitive training and stimulation solely did not lead to significant improvements in working memory related functions among post-stroke patients. However, the combined application may be favourable. The effectiveness of cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation needs further examination. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2025; 27(2): 88-105)