The relationship between trait mindfulness and problematic usage of the internet, screen time, and nomophobia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Johannes C Fendel, Johannes J Bürkle, Stefan Schmidt
{"title":"The relationship between trait mindfulness and problematic usage of the internet, screen time, and nomophobia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Johannes C Fendel, Johannes J Bürkle, Stefan Schmidt","doi":"10.1556/2006.2025.00052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Global research has explored the relationship between trait mindfulness and problematic usage of the internet (PUI), an umbrella term encompassing uncontrolled, excessive, and potentially harmful online behaviors with significant individual and societal costs. Relatedly, studies have examined trait mindfulness in relation to screen time and nomophobia (i.e., the discomfort from having no access to one's technology).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched eight databases from inception to April 04, 2024 with no language restrictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 140 studies involving 79,080 participants. A medium negative relationship between overall trait mindfulness and PUI (k = 120; r = -0.38) was found. Specific facets of trait mindfulness, including Acting with awareness (k = 19; r = -0.42), Non-judging of experience (k = 16; r = -0.24), and Describing (k = 14; r = -0.11) were negatively associated with PUI, while Non-reactivity to inner experience (k = 13; r = -0.07) and Observing (k = 14; r = 0.03) were not. Small negative correlations were observed between trait mindfulness and screen time (k = 17; r = -0.11) and nomophobia (k = 12; r = -0.26). Relationships were robust in sensitivity analyses, such as excluding outliers or low quality studies, or using longitudinal data. No publication bias was observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Individuals with higher trait mindfulness tend to exhibit fewer signs of PUI and nomophobia and report slightly less screen time. Trait mindfulness may protect against future PUI. High-quality, more fine-grained longitudinal research is needed to explore how specific facets of mindfulness, PUI subtypes, and screen time interact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","volume":"14 2","pages":"590-610"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Global research has explored the relationship between trait mindfulness and problematic usage of the internet (PUI), an umbrella term encompassing uncontrolled, excessive, and potentially harmful online behaviors with significant individual and societal costs. Relatedly, studies have examined trait mindfulness in relation to screen time and nomophobia (i.e., the discomfort from having no access to one's technology).

Methods: We systematically searched eight databases from inception to April 04, 2024 with no language restrictions.

Results: We included 140 studies involving 79,080 participants. A medium negative relationship between overall trait mindfulness and PUI (k = 120; r = -0.38) was found. Specific facets of trait mindfulness, including Acting with awareness (k = 19; r = -0.42), Non-judging of experience (k = 16; r = -0.24), and Describing (k = 14; r = -0.11) were negatively associated with PUI, while Non-reactivity to inner experience (k = 13; r = -0.07) and Observing (k = 14; r = 0.03) were not. Small negative correlations were observed between trait mindfulness and screen time (k = 17; r = -0.11) and nomophobia (k = 12; r = -0.26). Relationships were robust in sensitivity analyses, such as excluding outliers or low quality studies, or using longitudinal data. No publication bias was observed.

Discussion and conclusion: Individuals with higher trait mindfulness tend to exhibit fewer signs of PUI and nomophobia and report slightly less screen time. Trait mindfulness may protect against future PUI. High-quality, more fine-grained longitudinal research is needed to explore how specific facets of mindfulness, PUI subtypes, and screen time interact.

特质正念与网络使用、屏幕时间和无手机恐惧症之间的关系:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导读:全球研究已经探索了特质正念与互联网问题使用(PUI)之间的关系,PUI是一个总称,包括不受控制的、过度的和潜在有害的网络行为,具有重大的个人和社会成本。相关的研究也考察了特质正念与屏幕时间和无恐惧症(即无法接触科技产品的不适)之间的关系。方法:系统检索自成立至2024年04月04日的8个数据库,无语言限制。结果:我们纳入了140项研究,涉及79,080名受试者。整体特质正念与PUI呈中等负相关(k = 120;R = -0.38)。特质正念的具体方面,包括有意识地行动(k = 19;r = -0.42),经验的非判断性(k = 16;r = -0.24),描述(k = 14;r = -0.11)与PUI呈负相关,而对内在体验的无反应性(k = 13;r = -0.07)和Observing (k = 14;R = 0.03)。特质正念与屏幕时间之间存在较小的负相关(k = 17;R = -0.11)和无恐惧症(k = 12;R = -0.26)。在敏感性分析中,如排除异常值或低质量研究,或使用纵向数据,关系是稳健的。未观察到发表偏倚。讨论和结论:具有较高特质正念的个体倾向于较少表现出PUI和无恐惧症的迹象,并且报告的屏幕时间略少。特质正念可以防止未来的PUI。需要高质量、更细致的纵向研究来探索正念、PUI亚型和屏幕时间的具体方面是如何相互作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of Behavioral Addictions is to create a forum for the scientific information exchange with regard to behavioral addictions. The journal is a broad focused interdisciplinary one that publishes manuscripts on different approaches of non-substance addictions, research reports focusing on the addictive patterns of various behaviors, especially disorders of the impulsive-compulsive spectrum, and also publishes reviews in these topics. Coverage ranges from genetic and neurobiological research through psychological and clinical psychiatric approaches to epidemiological, sociological and anthropological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信