Automated Reminders Improve Feedback in Surgical Training

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Rhys Richmond BS , Candice Kremer MD , Samipya Kafle MD , Jonathan Y. Lee MD, MPH , Yan Ho Lee MD
{"title":"Automated Reminders Improve Feedback in Surgical Training","authors":"Rhys Richmond BS ,&nbsp;Candice Kremer MD ,&nbsp;Samipya Kafle MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Y. Lee MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Yan Ho Lee MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Feedback is an essential component of medical residency, particularly in subspecialty fields like otolaryngology where residents must adapt to a wide array of surgical techniques. However, a lack of timeliness or insufficient frequency can hurt feedback quality. Faculty may believe feedback is timelier and of higher quality compared to their trainees’ impressions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to improve faculty and resident feedback satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a month-long survey and automated text message intervention in 2023 to assess perceptions of the existing feedback system in an Otolaryngology residency program and measure postintervention changes. Text message reminders to give oral feedback and complete a pre-existing competency-based form were timed to arrive as the last surgical case ended.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 29 surgical faculty and 15 PGY-2 through PGY-5 residents invited to participate, 17 faculty (58% response rate) and 11 residents (73% response rate) completed both the pre- and postsurvey. Completed competency ACGME feedback forms increased from 4 in the previous month to 54 in the month of the intervention, a 13-fold increase. Overall, resident and faculty satisfaction with feedback improved, with the former reaching statistical significance. Faculty and residents agreed on major barriers to successful feedback: faculty forgetfulness, resident discomfort asking for feedback, and faculty time constraints. Opportunities for continued improvement noted in the postsurvey included quality of feedback and frequency.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Automated reminders can increase timeliness and quantity of feedback. This study presents preliminary data for a simple intervention that can be iterated upon to improve feedback in residency programs nationwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 9","pages":"Article 103591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425001722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Feedback is an essential component of medical residency, particularly in subspecialty fields like otolaryngology where residents must adapt to a wide array of surgical techniques. However, a lack of timeliness or insufficient frequency can hurt feedback quality. Faculty may believe feedback is timelier and of higher quality compared to their trainees’ impressions.

Objective

We aimed to improve faculty and resident feedback satisfaction.

Methods

We conducted a month-long survey and automated text message intervention in 2023 to assess perceptions of the existing feedback system in an Otolaryngology residency program and measure postintervention changes. Text message reminders to give oral feedback and complete a pre-existing competency-based form were timed to arrive as the last surgical case ended.

Results

Out of 29 surgical faculty and 15 PGY-2 through PGY-5 residents invited to participate, 17 faculty (58% response rate) and 11 residents (73% response rate) completed both the pre- and postsurvey. Completed competency ACGME feedback forms increased from 4 in the previous month to 54 in the month of the intervention, a 13-fold increase. Overall, resident and faculty satisfaction with feedback improved, with the former reaching statistical significance. Faculty and residents agreed on major barriers to successful feedback: faculty forgetfulness, resident discomfort asking for feedback, and faculty time constraints. Opportunities for continued improvement noted in the postsurvey included quality of feedback and frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated reminders can increase timeliness and quantity of feedback. This study presents preliminary data for a simple intervention that can be iterated upon to improve feedback in residency programs nationwide.
自动提醒改善外科训练的反馈
背景反馈是住院医师的重要组成部分,特别是在耳鼻喉科等专科领域,住院医师必须适应广泛的外科技术。然而,缺乏及时性或频率不足会影响反馈的质量。教师们可能认为,与学员的印象相比,反馈更及时、质量更高。目的提高教师和住院医师的反馈满意度。方法我们在2023年进行了为期一个月的调查和自动短信干预,以评估对耳鼻喉科住院医师项目现有反馈系统的看法,并测量干预后的变化。当最后一个手术病例结束时,发送短信提醒患者给予口头反馈,并填写一份基于先前能力的表格。结果29名外科教师和15名PGY-2至PGY-5住院医师受邀参加调查,其中17名教师(58%)和11名住院医师(73%)完成了调查前和调查后的调查。完成的能力ACGME反馈表格从上个月的4个增加到干预当月的54个,增加了13倍。总体而言,居民和教师对反馈的满意度有所提高,前者达到了统计学意义。教师和住院医生就成功反馈的主要障碍达成了一致:教师健忘、住院医生要求反馈时感到不舒服,以及教师时间有限。在事后调查中指出,持续改进的机会包括反馈的质量和频率。结论自动提醒可以提高反馈的及时性和数量。这项研究提供了一个简单的干预的初步数据,可以迭代,以改善全国住院医师计划的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信