{"title":"Developmental Trajectories of Friendship Homophily, Racial/Ethnic Identity Commitment, and Intergroup Bias Across Middle School.","authors":"Kara Kogachi,Sandra Graham","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02215-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although racial/ethnic homophily is a common feature of friendship networks, little is known about how preferences for same-race/ethnic friendships develop during early adolescence or how they are linked to the development of racial/ethnic identity and intergroup bias (attitudes favoring ingroups over outgroups). To address these gaps, the present study examined the longitudinal associations between baseline levels and trajectories of friendship homophily (same-race/ethnic preference), racial/ethnic identity commitment, and intergroup bias among early adolescents across the middle school years. Using a large racially/ethnically diverse sample (N = 4,576; Mage = 11.33 years at T1; 51% female; 41% Latinx, 26% White, 17% East/Southeast Asian, 16% African American/Black), findings from multivariate latent growth curve models indicated that friendship homophily and identity commitment trajectories were closely linked. Additionally, baseline homophily predicted greater identity commitment over time for racial/ethnic minoritized youth, but not White youth. In contrast, longitudinal associations between friendship homophily and intergroup bias were weak. Baseline friendship homophily did not predict intergroup bias trajectories; however, baseline levels of intergroup bias predicted increased homophily for racial/ethnic minoritized youth. Findings indicated that for racial/ethnic minoritized early adolescents, the development of friendship homophily is more closely linked to identity commitment than intergroup bias.","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02215-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although racial/ethnic homophily is a common feature of friendship networks, little is known about how preferences for same-race/ethnic friendships develop during early adolescence or how they are linked to the development of racial/ethnic identity and intergroup bias (attitudes favoring ingroups over outgroups). To address these gaps, the present study examined the longitudinal associations between baseline levels and trajectories of friendship homophily (same-race/ethnic preference), racial/ethnic identity commitment, and intergroup bias among early adolescents across the middle school years. Using a large racially/ethnically diverse sample (N = 4,576; Mage = 11.33 years at T1; 51% female; 41% Latinx, 26% White, 17% East/Southeast Asian, 16% African American/Black), findings from multivariate latent growth curve models indicated that friendship homophily and identity commitment trajectories were closely linked. Additionally, baseline homophily predicted greater identity commitment over time for racial/ethnic minoritized youth, but not White youth. In contrast, longitudinal associations between friendship homophily and intergroup bias were weak. Baseline friendship homophily did not predict intergroup bias trajectories; however, baseline levels of intergroup bias predicted increased homophily for racial/ethnic minoritized youth. Findings indicated that for racial/ethnic minoritized early adolescents, the development of friendship homophily is more closely linked to identity commitment than intergroup bias.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.