Lateral ridge augmentation using autogenous-xenogenic or allogenic-xenogenic graft mix with a cross-linked collagen membrane: a randomized pilot clinical trial

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Celine El Rassi, Carole Chakar, Gabriel Menassa, Adam Saleh, Rawad Samarani
{"title":"Lateral ridge augmentation using autogenous-xenogenic or allogenic-xenogenic graft mix with a cross-linked collagen membrane: a randomized pilot clinical trial","authors":"Celine El Rassi,&nbsp;Carole Chakar,&nbsp;Gabriel Menassa,&nbsp;Adam Saleh,&nbsp;Rawad Samarani","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>The aim of the present trial is to compare in a horizontal guided bone regeneration clinical model, the allogenic-xenogenic combination to the autogenous-xenogenic combination. Edentulous ridges with less than 5 mm width were treated with guided bone regeneration using a </span>glutaraldehyde<span> cross-linked collagen membrane. Two graft combinations were used: autogenous-xenogenic (control group) or allogenic-xenogenic (test group). Ridge width measurements were recorded clinically and radiographically at 1, 3 and 5 mm from the ridge crest. Probe penetration was also recorded, and soft tissue healing was assessed during the follow-up visits. Core biopsies were retrieved for histological analysis. Four patients were recruited and randomly allocated to treatment groups with 12 sites of implant placement. 6 months after GBR surgery, all patients presented enough bone for implant placement. No difference was found between the groups in terms of clinical ridge width gain at the three levels of measurement. The mean percentage of graft resorption was 39.30 % and 29.31 % for control and test groups respectively, with no significant difference. In addition, no differences were found for probe penetration between the groups and no soft tissue complications occurred during follow-ups. Trends towards significance were evident for outcomes measurements. The protocol of this study should serve as a foundation for a larger-scale study with an improved population size.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 5","pages":"Article 102442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525002289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present trial is to compare in a horizontal guided bone regeneration clinical model, the allogenic-xenogenic combination to the autogenous-xenogenic combination. Edentulous ridges with less than 5 mm width were treated with guided bone regeneration using a glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen membrane. Two graft combinations were used: autogenous-xenogenic (control group) or allogenic-xenogenic (test group). Ridge width measurements were recorded clinically and radiographically at 1, 3 and 5 mm from the ridge crest. Probe penetration was also recorded, and soft tissue healing was assessed during the follow-up visits. Core biopsies were retrieved for histological analysis. Four patients were recruited and randomly allocated to treatment groups with 12 sites of implant placement. 6 months after GBR surgery, all patients presented enough bone for implant placement. No difference was found between the groups in terms of clinical ridge width gain at the three levels of measurement. The mean percentage of graft resorption was 39.30 % and 29.31 % for control and test groups respectively, with no significant difference. In addition, no differences were found for probe penetration between the groups and no soft tissue complications occurred during follow-ups. Trends towards significance were evident for outcomes measurements. The protocol of this study should serve as a foundation for a larger-scale study with an improved population size.
使用自体-异种或异体-异种混合移植物与交联胶原膜:一项随机试点临床试验。
本试验的目的是在水平引导骨再生临床模型中比较异体-异种组合与自体-异种组合。采用戊二醛交联胶原膜引导骨再生治疗宽度小于5mm的无牙嵴。采用两种移植组合:自体-异种(对照组)或异体-异种(试验组)。临床和影像学记录脊宽测量在距脊脊1、3和5毫米处。同时记录探针穿透情况,并在随访期间评估软组织愈合情况。取核心活检进行组织学分析。招募4例患者,随机分配到12个种植体放置位置的治疗组。GBR手术后6个月,所有患者均有足够的骨供种植体植入。在三个测量水平的临床脊宽增加方面,两组之间没有发现差异。对照组和试验组移植骨吸收率分别为39.30%和29.31%,差异无统计学意义。此外,两组间探针穿透率无差异,随访期间未发生软组织并发症。结果测量的显著性趋势是明显的。本研究的方案应作为更大规模研究的基础,以改善人口规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信