A Scoping Review of Research in Naturalistic Studies with Psychedelics.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Laura C Carvalho, Jorge Encantado, Hannes Kettner, Christopher Timmerman, Diogo Veiga, Pedro J Teixeira
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Research in Naturalistic Studies with Psychedelics.","authors":"Laura C Carvalho, Jorge Encantado, Hannes Kettner, Christopher Timmerman, Diogo Veiga, Pedro J Teixeira","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2520221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychedelic research has traditionally focused on controlled, clinical settings to evaluate the therapeutic potential of substances such as psilocybin. However, in recent years, there has been growing interest in naturalistic research, which explores psychedelic use in real-world settings. This review aims to critically analyze trends in naturalistic psychedelic research, focusing on sample demographics and the diversity of contextual factors across different settings. A systematic search in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted, including studies that involved the use of classic psychedelics in real-world settings. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data on both sample and setting characteristics. A total of 103 studies were included, most of which employed a cross-sectional survey-based design (<i>n</i> = 54), with sample characteristics being widely reported, albeit with considerable variability across studies. Ayahuasca was the most frequently studied substance (66%), and ceremonial settings were the most commonly reported (35.9%). While sample characteristics were widely reported, there was significant variability. Specific contextual components, such as music, were often underreported, with longitudinal studies providing the most comprehensive details. This review highlights the need for systematic reporting standards in naturalistic psychedelic research to maximize its complementary value alongside clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2520221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychedelic research has traditionally focused on controlled, clinical settings to evaluate the therapeutic potential of substances such as psilocybin. However, in recent years, there has been growing interest in naturalistic research, which explores psychedelic use in real-world settings. This review aims to critically analyze trends in naturalistic psychedelic research, focusing on sample demographics and the diversity of contextual factors across different settings. A systematic search in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted, including studies that involved the use of classic psychedelics in real-world settings. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data on both sample and setting characteristics. A total of 103 studies were included, most of which employed a cross-sectional survey-based design (n = 54), with sample characteristics being widely reported, albeit with considerable variability across studies. Ayahuasca was the most frequently studied substance (66%), and ceremonial settings were the most commonly reported (35.9%). While sample characteristics were widely reported, there was significant variability. Specific contextual components, such as music, were often underreported, with longitudinal studies providing the most comprehensive details. This review highlights the need for systematic reporting standards in naturalistic psychedelic research to maximize its complementary value alongside clinical trials.

致幻剂自然主义研究综述。
迷幻药的研究传统上集中在受控的临床环境中,以评估裸盖菇素等物质的治疗潜力。然而,近年来,人们对自然主义的研究越来越感兴趣,这种研究探索了迷幻药在现实世界中的使用。本文旨在批判性地分析自然致幻剂研究的趋势,重点关注样本人口统计学和不同环境下背景因素的多样性。在PubMed, PsycINFO和Web of Science中进行了系统的搜索,包括在现实环境中使用经典致幻剂的研究。两位审稿人独立筛选文章并提取样本和设定特征的数据。共纳入103项研究,其中大多数采用基于横断面调查的设计(n = 54),样本特征被广泛报道,尽管研究之间存在相当大的差异。死藤水是最常被研究的物质(66%),而仪式场所是最常被报道的(35.9%)。虽然样本特征被广泛报道,但存在显著的可变性。具体的背景成分,如音乐,往往被低估,纵向研究提供了最全面的细节。这篇综述强调了在自然致幻剂研究中需要有系统的报告标准,以最大限度地发挥其与临床试验的互补价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信