A free-operant olfactory choice procedure to assess preference for social and nonsocial scents in female rats

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jay E. Hinnenkamp, Alex Dunthorn, Ann Galizio, Tiffany Rogers
{"title":"A free-operant olfactory choice procedure to assess preference for social and nonsocial scents in female rats","authors":"Jay E. Hinnenkamp,&nbsp;Alex Dunthorn,&nbsp;Ann Galizio,&nbsp;Tiffany Rogers","doi":"10.1002/jeab.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rats are a social species, often used as a research model to study social behavior. However, isolating the factors (i.e., environmental stimuli, experiences with social interactions, novelty, etc.) that influence rats' social behavior can be difficult in many existing social choice assessments. A procedure that may help researchers investigate these variables more systematically is the olfactory choice procedure. The present set of experiments used a free-operant olfactory choice procedure to assess individually housed female rats' preference for social and nonsocial scents. In Experiment 1, rats ran daily sessions in which a response to a nose-poke port produced either a social or nonsocial scent. A response to a second nose-poke port produced a control scent. In Experiment 2, the same female rats could respond in one nose-poke port to produce a social scent and in a second port to produce a nonsocial scent. The results from Experiment 1 indicate that rats prefer social and nonsocial scents over a control scent and that this preference persists across a location reversal and 100+ daily sessions. Although there were individual differences, group results from Experiment 2 suggest that rats prefer social and nonsocial scents relatively equally.</p>","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeab.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rats are a social species, often used as a research model to study social behavior. However, isolating the factors (i.e., environmental stimuli, experiences with social interactions, novelty, etc.) that influence rats' social behavior can be difficult in many existing social choice assessments. A procedure that may help researchers investigate these variables more systematically is the olfactory choice procedure. The present set of experiments used a free-operant olfactory choice procedure to assess individually housed female rats' preference for social and nonsocial scents. In Experiment 1, rats ran daily sessions in which a response to a nose-poke port produced either a social or nonsocial scent. A response to a second nose-poke port produced a control scent. In Experiment 2, the same female rats could respond in one nose-poke port to produce a social scent and in a second port to produce a nonsocial scent. The results from Experiment 1 indicate that rats prefer social and nonsocial scents over a control scent and that this preference persists across a location reversal and 100+ daily sessions. Although there were individual differences, group results from Experiment 2 suggest that rats prefer social and nonsocial scents relatively equally.

一种评估雌性大鼠对社会和非社会气味偏好的自由操作嗅觉选择程序
大鼠是一种群居物种,经常被用作研究社会行为的研究模型。然而,在许多现有的社会选择评估中,分离影响大鼠社会行为的因素(即环境刺激、社会互动经验、新颖性等)可能是困难的。一个可以帮助研究人员更系统地调查这些变量的程序是嗅觉选择程序。本实验采用自由操作的嗅觉选择程序来评估单独饲养的雌性大鼠对社会和非社会气味的偏好。在实验1中,老鼠每天都会对戳鼻子的动作做出反应,产生社交或非社交气味。对第二次戳鼻子的反应产生了一种对照气味。在实验2中,同样的雌性大鼠可以在一个探鼻口产生社会性气味,在另一个探鼻口产生非社会性气味。实验1的结果表明,与对照气味相比,大鼠更喜欢社交和非社交气味,这种偏好在位置反转和100多个日常会话中持续存在。尽管存在个体差异,但实验2的组结果表明,大鼠对社交和非社交气味的偏好相对平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信