Intraoperative repositioning accuracy in transoral endoscopically-assisted mandibular subcondylar fracture repair: A 3-dimensional analysis

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Andreas Sakkas , Carolin Schulze , Mario Scheurer , Marcel Ebeling , Robin Kasper , Alexander Schramm , Frank Wilde , Johannes Schulze
{"title":"Intraoperative repositioning accuracy in transoral endoscopically-assisted mandibular subcondylar fracture repair: A 3-dimensional analysis","authors":"Andreas Sakkas ,&nbsp;Carolin Schulze ,&nbsp;Mario Scheurer ,&nbsp;Marcel Ebeling ,&nbsp;Robin Kasper ,&nbsp;Alexander Schramm ,&nbsp;Frank Wilde ,&nbsp;Johannes Schulze","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To date, no clinical study has compared the preoperative and intraoperative 3D positions of fractured mandibular condyles following transoral endoscopically-assisted reduction and osteosynthesis. The primary aim of this study was to analyze and compare the final intraoperative position of the fractured mandibular condyle with a virtually simulated, idealized condylar position. The secondary aim was to assess the association between patient-, trauma-, and procedure-specific variables and intraoperative surgical accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent transoral endoscopically-assisted osteosynthesis of mandibular subcondylar fractures — without the use of transbuccal trocars — over a six-year period were included. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and procedural data were analyzed. The final intraoperative position of the condylar fragment, based on intraoperative 3D C-arm imaging, was compared with the anatomic ideal reduction simulated with the preoperative CT scan. Univariate analyses were performed to identify associations between clinical and surgical variables and intraoperative repositioning accuracy. The primary outcome was the geometric accuracy of reduction, quantified using the Dice coefficient, mean multiplanar deviation, and rotational deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 86 patients with 95 subcondylar fractures. Eleven cases were excluded due to incomplete data and insufficient quality for segmentation. The most common mechanism of injury was bicycle trauma (<em>n</em> = 35; 36.8 %), followed by violence (<em>n</em> = 26; 27.4 %) and tripping falls (<em>n</em> = 13; 13.7 %). The mean Dice coefficient was 0.62 ± 0.18, the mean multiplanar deviation was 2.79 ± 1.53 mm, and the average rotational deviation was 10.18° ± 6.17° Univariate analysis revealed that greater preoperative sideward displacement of the condylar fragment was significantly associated with higher multiplanar deviation (<em>p</em> = 0.03) and a lower Dice coefficient (<em>p</em> = 0.05). Moreover, a higher length of the condylar fragment was significantly associated with a lower risk of intraoperative rotational deviation (<em>p</em> = 0.003). There was no association between the time interval from trauma to surgery and the intraoperative surgical accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study confirms that endoscopically-assisted intraoral osteosynthesis enables accurate reduction in most cases. However, complex fracture morphologies—particularly those with significant sideward displacement or short proximal segments—pose a higher risk for positional deviations. These findings support the use of intraoperative 3D imaging and virtual modelling to improve surgical precision and establish new quality benchmarks in maxillofacial trauma surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 5","pages":"Article 102441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525002277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To date, no clinical study has compared the preoperative and intraoperative 3D positions of fractured mandibular condyles following transoral endoscopically-assisted reduction and osteosynthesis. The primary aim of this study was to analyze and compare the final intraoperative position of the fractured mandibular condyle with a virtually simulated, idealized condylar position. The secondary aim was to assess the association between patient-, trauma-, and procedure-specific variables and intraoperative surgical accuracy.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent transoral endoscopically-assisted osteosynthesis of mandibular subcondylar fractures — without the use of transbuccal trocars — over a six-year period were included. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and procedural data were analyzed. The final intraoperative position of the condylar fragment, based on intraoperative 3D C-arm imaging, was compared with the anatomic ideal reduction simulated with the preoperative CT scan. Univariate analyses were performed to identify associations between clinical and surgical variables and intraoperative repositioning accuracy. The primary outcome was the geometric accuracy of reduction, quantified using the Dice coefficient, mean multiplanar deviation, and rotational deviation.

Results

A total of 86 patients with 95 subcondylar fractures. Eleven cases were excluded due to incomplete data and insufficient quality for segmentation. The most common mechanism of injury was bicycle trauma (n = 35; 36.8 %), followed by violence (n = 26; 27.4 %) and tripping falls (n = 13; 13.7 %). The mean Dice coefficient was 0.62 ± 0.18, the mean multiplanar deviation was 2.79 ± 1.53 mm, and the average rotational deviation was 10.18° ± 6.17° Univariate analysis revealed that greater preoperative sideward displacement of the condylar fragment was significantly associated with higher multiplanar deviation (p = 0.03) and a lower Dice coefficient (p = 0.05). Moreover, a higher length of the condylar fragment was significantly associated with a lower risk of intraoperative rotational deviation (p = 0.003). There was no association between the time interval from trauma to surgery and the intraoperative surgical accuracy.

Discussion

This study confirms that endoscopically-assisted intraoral osteosynthesis enables accurate reduction in most cases. However, complex fracture morphologies—particularly those with significant sideward displacement or short proximal segments—pose a higher risk for positional deviations. These findings support the use of intraoperative 3D imaging and virtual modelling to improve surgical precision and establish new quality benchmarks in maxillofacial trauma surgery.
经口内镜辅助下下颌髁下骨折修复术中重新定位的准确性:三维分析。
迄今为止,还没有临床研究比较经口内镜辅助复位和植骨术后下颌髁骨折的术前和术中3D位置。本研究的主要目的是分析和比较骨折下颌髁的最终术中位置与虚拟模拟的理想髁位置。第二个目的是评估患者、创伤和手术特异性变量与术中手术准确性之间的关系。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,接受经口内窥镜辅助下下颌髁下骨折骨融合术(不使用经口套管针)超过6年的患者被纳入研究。对人口学、临床、放射学和手术资料进行分析。基于术中3D c臂成像,将术中髁碎片的最终位置与术前CT扫描模拟的解剖理想复位进行比较。进行单因素分析以确定临床和手术变量与术中重新定位准确性之间的关系。主要结果是几何还原精度,使用Dice系数、平均多平面偏差和旋转偏差进行量化。结果:共86例患者95例髁下骨折。11例因资料不全、分割质量不足而被排除。最常见的损伤机制是自行车损伤(n = 35;36.8%),其次是暴力(n = 26;27.4%)和绊倒(n = 13;13.7%)。平均Dice系数为0.62±0.18,平均多平面偏差为2.79±1.53 mm,平均旋转偏差为10.18°±6.17°。单因素分析显示,术前较大的髁碎片侧向移位与较高的多平面偏差(p = 0.03)和较低的Dice系数(p = 0.05)显著相关。此外,较长的髁碎片与较低的术中旋转偏差风险显著相关(p = 0.003)。从创伤到手术的时间间隔与术中手术准确性之间没有相关性。讨论:本研究证实,在大多数情况下,内镜辅助口内植骨术可以实现准确复位。然而,复杂的骨折形态,特别是那些有明显的侧向移位或近端短节段的骨折,会增加位置偏差的风险。这些发现支持术中3D成像和虚拟建模的使用,以提高手术精度,并建立新的颌面创伤手术质量基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信