Optimizing Vibrotactile Feedback for Sensory Substitution in the Thigh: Spatial Acuity and Frequency Characteristics.

IF 2.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Daniel E Genaro, Laura C Marrelli, Erika E Howe, Emma B Plater, Michael Apollinaro, John Zettel, Leah R Bent
{"title":"Optimizing Vibrotactile Feedback for Sensory Substitution in the Thigh: Spatial Acuity and Frequency Characteristics.","authors":"Daniel E Genaro, Laura C Marrelli, Erika E Howe, Emma B Plater, Michael Apollinaro, John Zettel, Leah R Bent","doi":"10.1109/TOH.2025.3583962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amputation of a lower limb not only affects mobility but also interferes with sensory feedback, leading to an elevated risk of falls among individuals living with amputation. Sensory substitution, achieved through tactile displays embedded in transfemoral prosthetic sockets, presents a promising non-invasive solution to provide artificial sensation to users. However, for this approach to be effective, users must accurately perceive distinct combinations of vibrations, a capacity limited by their two-point discrimination ability. This study examined whether spacing two vibrotactile stimuli within the 20-30 mm range, on the thigh, enabled the perception of distinct points and whether vibration frequency affected spatial acuity. We defined the ability to perceive two distinct points as achieving at least a 75% accuracy in responses, and based on this criterion, we determined that the minimum distance required for two-point discrimination lies between 25 mm and 30 mm. Notably, our study revealed that spatial acuity was not altered when vibrating at either low (30 Hz) or high (150 Hz) frequencies, provided the vibrations were at the perceptual threshold. Lastly, our findings consistently favoured stimuli that were spaced out vertically over horizontal ones. These findings contribute to the improvement of tactile displays intended for sensory substitution in transfemoral prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":13215,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Haptics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Haptics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2025.3583962","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amputation of a lower limb not only affects mobility but also interferes with sensory feedback, leading to an elevated risk of falls among individuals living with amputation. Sensory substitution, achieved through tactile displays embedded in transfemoral prosthetic sockets, presents a promising non-invasive solution to provide artificial sensation to users. However, for this approach to be effective, users must accurately perceive distinct combinations of vibrations, a capacity limited by their two-point discrimination ability. This study examined whether spacing two vibrotactile stimuli within the 20-30 mm range, on the thigh, enabled the perception of distinct points and whether vibration frequency affected spatial acuity. We defined the ability to perceive two distinct points as achieving at least a 75% accuracy in responses, and based on this criterion, we determined that the minimum distance required for two-point discrimination lies between 25 mm and 30 mm. Notably, our study revealed that spatial acuity was not altered when vibrating at either low (30 Hz) or high (150 Hz) frequencies, provided the vibrations were at the perceptual threshold. Lastly, our findings consistently favoured stimuli that were spaced out vertically over horizontal ones. These findings contribute to the improvement of tactile displays intended for sensory substitution in transfemoral prostheses.

优化振动触觉反馈在大腿的感觉替代:空间敏锐度和频率特性。
下肢截肢不仅会影响活动能力,还会干扰感觉反馈,导致截肢者跌倒的风险增加。通过嵌入经股假体插座的触觉显示器实现的感觉替代,为用户提供人工感觉提供了一种有前途的非侵入性解决方案。然而,为了使这种方法有效,用户必须准确地感知振动的不同组合,这种能力受到他们两点辨别能力的限制。这项研究考察了在20-30毫米范围内,在大腿上间隔两个振动触觉刺激是否能够感知不同的点,以及振动频率是否会影响空间敏锐度。我们将感知两个不同点的能力定义为在响应中达到至少75%的准确度,并根据这一标准,我们确定两点识别所需的最小距离在25毫米到30毫米之间。值得注意的是,我们的研究表明,在低(30赫兹)或高(150赫兹)频率振动时,只要振动处于感知阈值,空间敏切度都不会改变。最后,我们的研究结果始终支持垂直间隔的刺激而不是水平间隔的刺激。这些发现有助于改善经股假体中用于感觉替代的触觉显示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
IEEE Transactions on Haptics COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
13.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Haptics (ToH) is a scholarly archival journal that addresses the science, technology, and applications associated with information acquisition and object manipulation through touch. Haptic interactions relevant to this journal include all aspects of manual exploration and manipulation of objects by humans, machines and interactions between the two, performed in real, virtual, teleoperated or networked environments. Research areas of relevance to this publication include, but are not limited to, the following topics: Human haptic and multi-sensory perception and action, Aspects of motor control that explicitly pertain to human haptics, Haptic interactions via passive or active tools and machines, Devices that sense, enable, or create haptic interactions locally or at a distance, Haptic rendering and its association with graphic and auditory rendering in virtual reality, Algorithms, controls, and dynamics of haptic devices, users, and interactions between the two, Human-machine performance and safety with haptic feedback, Haptics in the context of human-computer interactions, Systems and networks using haptic devices and interactions, including multi-modal feedback, Application of the above, for example in areas such as education, rehabilitation, medicine, computer-aided design, skills training, computer games, driver controls, simulation, and visualization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信