"I Wish I Knew": Assessing Older Adults' Perceived and Actual Knowledge of Their Partners' End-of-Life Preferences.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf038
Clément Meier, Maud Wieczorek, Carmen Borrat-Besson, Ralf J Jox, Jürgen Maurer
{"title":"\"I Wish I Knew\": Assessing Older Adults' Perceived and Actual Knowledge of Their Partners' End-of-Life Preferences.","authors":"Clément Meier, Maud Wieczorek, Carmen Borrat-Besson, Ralf J Jox, Jürgen Maurer","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Despite the importance of surrogate decision-making by partners at the end of life, there is only limited research on older adults' knowledge of their partners' end-of-life preferences. Hence, this study investigates older adults' perceived and actual knowledge of their partners' preferences for end-of-life care and medical treatments.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 667 respondents aged 50+ from Wave 8 (2019/2020) of the Survey on Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe in Switzerland. We assessed respondents' actual knowledge by comparing their perceptions of their partners' preferences for end-of-life care and medical treatments with the partners' self-reported preferences. Additionally, respondents were asked to rate their perceived knowledge of their partners' wishes. Associations were assessed using multivariable regression models, adjusting for social, health, and regional characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents' actual knowledge of their partners' preferences varied, with the share of correct answers ranging from 35% to 81% depending on the preferences. More than 80% of respondents felt that they knew their partners' end-of-life and medical treatment preferences \"rather\" or \"very\" well, and those respondents were more likely to identify their partners' preferences accurately.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Improved communication between partners regarding their end-of-life preferences could significantly enhance surrogate end-of-life decision-making. However, since older adults' perceived knowledge of their partners' preferences seems overly optimistic, they may see little need to initiate such conversations by themselves, emphasizing the need for external educational interventions such as role-plays or case study discussions through, say, the community, or healthcare system to encourage such conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 6","pages":"igaf038"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Despite the importance of surrogate decision-making by partners at the end of life, there is only limited research on older adults' knowledge of their partners' end-of-life preferences. Hence, this study investigates older adults' perceived and actual knowledge of their partners' preferences for end-of-life care and medical treatments.

Research design and methods: We analyzed data from 667 respondents aged 50+ from Wave 8 (2019/2020) of the Survey on Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe in Switzerland. We assessed respondents' actual knowledge by comparing their perceptions of their partners' preferences for end-of-life care and medical treatments with the partners' self-reported preferences. Additionally, respondents were asked to rate their perceived knowledge of their partners' wishes. Associations were assessed using multivariable regression models, adjusting for social, health, and regional characteristics.

Results: Respondents' actual knowledge of their partners' preferences varied, with the share of correct answers ranging from 35% to 81% depending on the preferences. More than 80% of respondents felt that they knew their partners' end-of-life and medical treatment preferences "rather" or "very" well, and those respondents were more likely to identify their partners' preferences accurately.

Discussion and implications: Improved communication between partners regarding their end-of-life preferences could significantly enhance surrogate end-of-life decision-making. However, since older adults' perceived knowledge of their partners' preferences seems overly optimistic, they may see little need to initiate such conversations by themselves, emphasizing the need for external educational interventions such as role-plays or case study discussions through, say, the community, or healthcare system to encourage such conversations.

“我希望我知道”:评估老年人对其伴侣临终偏好的感知和实际知识。
背景和目的:尽管伴侣在临终时的替代决策很重要,但关于老年人对伴侣临终偏好的了解的研究有限。因此,本研究调查老年人对其伴侣的临终关怀和医疗偏好的感知和实际知识。研究设计和方法:我们分析了瑞士欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查第8波(2019/2020)中667名50岁以上受访者的数据。我们通过比较他们对伴侣对临终关怀和医疗的偏好的看法与伴侣自我报告的偏好来评估受访者的实际知识。此外,受访者还被要求对他们对伴侣愿望的认知程度进行评分。使用多变量回归模型评估关联,调整社会、健康和区域特征。结果:受访者对其伴侣偏好的实际了解各不相同,根据偏好的不同,正确答案的比例从35%到81%不等。超过80%的受访者认为,他们“相当”或“非常”了解伴侣的临终和医疗偏好,这些受访者更有可能准确地识别伴侣的偏好。讨论和影响:改善伴侣之间关于其临终偏好的沟通可以显著提高替代临终决策。然而,由于老年人对伴侣偏好的认知似乎过于乐观,他们可能认为自己没有必要发起这样的对话,强调需要外部教育干预,如角色扮演或案例研究讨论,通过社区或医疗保健系统来鼓励这样的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信