Kyphoplasty as a Treatment Option for Traumatic Burst Fractures: A Case Series Evaluating Patient Outcomes and Functional Benefits.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Anoop S Chinthala, Barnabas Obeng-Gyasi, Trenton A Line, Matthew K Tobin, Gordon Mao, Bradley N Bohnstedt
{"title":"Kyphoplasty as a Treatment Option for Traumatic Burst Fractures: A Case Series Evaluating Patient Outcomes and Functional Benefits.","authors":"Anoop S Chinthala, Barnabas Obeng-Gyasi, Trenton A Line, Matthew K Tobin, Gordon Mao, Bradley N Bohnstedt","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15060659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are minimally invasive approaches for spinal fractures aiming to reduce pain, increase mobilization, and prevent further vertebral height loss. Their efficacy in treating burst fractures has been questioned due to fragment mobility and concerns for cement leakage. We aim to report outcomes in patients who underwent kyphoplasty for spinal burst fractures. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with burst fractures treated from 2018 to 2023. Those who underwent kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty and had follow-up imaging were included. Clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes were obtained through chart review. The primary outcome was the need for surgical intervention after kyphoplasty. <b>Results</b>: We identified ten patients (mean age 67.9 years, range 36-93 years) with burst fractures who underwent kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty. Six received kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty within 1 week of injury and four between 1 and 4 months post-injury. Nine patients had a TLICS score of 2, and one had a TLICS score of 5. Kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty was performed for pain management in seven patients and significant/worsening vertebral height loss in three patients. At follow-up, 70% of patients reported an improvement in pain and 75% of patients reported improved mobility. One patient experienced progression of an L2 burst fracture but improved with conservative management. No patient required additional surgical fixation. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this series of ten patients with spinal burst fractures, standalone kyphoplasty was a safe and effective treatment. Our findings suggest kyphoplasty may be a viable treatment option for select spinal traumatic burst fractures, offering potential pain relief and mobility improvement in the short term.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are minimally invasive approaches for spinal fractures aiming to reduce pain, increase mobilization, and prevent further vertebral height loss. Their efficacy in treating burst fractures has been questioned due to fragment mobility and concerns for cement leakage. We aim to report outcomes in patients who underwent kyphoplasty for spinal burst fractures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with burst fractures treated from 2018 to 2023. Those who underwent kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty and had follow-up imaging were included. Clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes were obtained through chart review. The primary outcome was the need for surgical intervention after kyphoplasty. Results: We identified ten patients (mean age 67.9 years, range 36-93 years) with burst fractures who underwent kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty. Six received kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty within 1 week of injury and four between 1 and 4 months post-injury. Nine patients had a TLICS score of 2, and one had a TLICS score of 5. Kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty was performed for pain management in seven patients and significant/worsening vertebral height loss in three patients. At follow-up, 70% of patients reported an improvement in pain and 75% of patients reported improved mobility. One patient experienced progression of an L2 burst fracture but improved with conservative management. No patient required additional surgical fixation. Conclusions: In this series of ten patients with spinal burst fractures, standalone kyphoplasty was a safe and effective treatment. Our findings suggest kyphoplasty may be a viable treatment option for select spinal traumatic burst fractures, offering potential pain relief and mobility improvement in the short term.

后凸成形术作为外伤性爆裂骨折的治疗选择:评估患者预后和功能益处的病例系列。
背景/目的:后凸成形术和椎体成形术是治疗脊柱骨折的微创方法,旨在减轻疼痛,增加活动,防止进一步的椎体高度损失。由于碎片的流动性和对水泥泄漏的担忧,它们治疗爆裂骨折的有效性受到质疑。我们的目的是报道脊柱爆裂骨折后凸成形术患者的预后。方法:我们对2018年至2023年治疗的爆裂性骨折患者进行回顾性分析。接受后凸成形术或椎体成形术并随访的患者也包括在内。通过图表复习获得临床特征及随访结果。主要结果是后凸成形术后是否需要手术干预。结果:我们确定了10例爆裂骨折患者(平均年龄67.9岁,范围36-93岁),他们接受了后凸/椎体成形术。6例在伤后1周内接受后凸/椎体成形术,4例在伤后1 - 4个月内接受。9例患者TLICS评分为2分,1例患者TLICS评分为5分。7例患者采用后凸成形术/椎体成形术治疗疼痛,3例患者椎体高度明显/恶化。在随访中,70%的患者报告疼痛改善,75%的患者报告活动能力改善。1例患者出现L2爆裂性骨折进展,但经保守治疗得到改善。没有患者需要额外的手术固定。结论:在10例脊柱爆裂骨折患者中,独立后凸成形术是一种安全有效的治疗方法。我们的研究结果表明,脊柱后凸成形术可能是一种可行的治疗选择,可以在短期内缓解疼痛和改善活动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信