Andrea Sánchez-Robalino, Hugo Sinchi-Sinchi, Andrés Ramírez
{"title":"Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Physical Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Andrea Sánchez-Robalino, Hugo Sinchi-Sinchi, Andrés Ramírez","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15060658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Pain neuroscience education (PNE), when combined with physical therapy interventions, has been recognized as an effective strategy for improving pain management and reducing disability in individuals with chronic pain. <b>Objective</b>: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PNE in combination with rehabilitation modalities, with a focus on pain reduction and functional improvement. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, PsycInfo, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized clinical trials examining the effects of combining PNE with physical therapy. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on demographic and methodological characteristics, as well as outcomes related to pain and disability. <b>Results</b>: The findings indicate that PNE combined with physical therapy significantly reduces pain intensity and enhances functionality. The mean pain score decreased from 5.89 (pre-intervention) to 3.03 (post-intervention), with similar improvements observed in disability outcomes. However, heterogeneity among studies-attributable to sociocultural and methodological differences-suggests the need for a cautious interpretation of the results. <b>Conclusions</b>: The integration of PNE with physical therapy appears to be an effective approach for reducing pain and improving functional outcomes in patients with chronic pain. Nevertheless, further research is recommended to address existing heterogeneity and to refine standardized intervention protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pain neuroscience education (PNE), when combined with physical therapy interventions, has been recognized as an effective strategy for improving pain management and reducing disability in individuals with chronic pain. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PNE in combination with rehabilitation modalities, with a focus on pain reduction and functional improvement. Methods: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, PsycInfo, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized clinical trials examining the effects of combining PNE with physical therapy. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on demographic and methodological characteristics, as well as outcomes related to pain and disability. Results: The findings indicate that PNE combined with physical therapy significantly reduces pain intensity and enhances functionality. The mean pain score decreased from 5.89 (pre-intervention) to 3.03 (post-intervention), with similar improvements observed in disability outcomes. However, heterogeneity among studies-attributable to sociocultural and methodological differences-suggests the need for a cautious interpretation of the results. Conclusions: The integration of PNE with physical therapy appears to be an effective approach for reducing pain and improving functional outcomes in patients with chronic pain. Nevertheless, further research is recommended to address existing heterogeneity and to refine standardized intervention protocols.
背景:疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)与物理治疗干预相结合,已被认为是改善慢性疼痛患者疼痛管理和减少残疾的有效策略。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估PNE与康复模式相结合的有效性,重点是减轻疼痛和改善功能。方法:在Cochrane、PsycInfo、PubMed、ScienceDirect、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行全面的系统检索,以确定随机临床试验,检查PNE联合物理治疗的效果。19项研究符合纳入标准。数据提取侧重于人口统计学和方法学特征,以及与疼痛和残疾相关的结果。结果:PNE联合物理治疗可明显减轻疼痛强度,增强功能。平均疼痛评分从5.89(干预前)降至3.03(干预后),残疾结局也有类似的改善。然而,由于社会文化和方法差异,研究的异质性表明需要谨慎解释结果。结论:PNE与物理治疗相结合似乎是减轻慢性疼痛患者疼痛和改善功能预后的有效方法。然而,建议进一步研究以解决现有的异质性并完善标准化的干预方案。
期刊介绍:
Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.