Point-Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Use in Benin Hospitals: The Need for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sarah Delfosse, Carine Laurence Yehouenou, Angèle Dohou, Dessièdé Ariane Fiogbe, Olivia Dalleur
{"title":"Point-Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Use in Benin Hospitals: The Need for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.","authors":"Sarah Delfosse, Carine Laurence Yehouenou, Angèle Dohou, Dessièdé Ariane Fiogbe, Olivia Dalleur","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14060618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health concern worldwide, particularly in low-to-middle-income countries with few antimicrobial stewardship programs and few laboratories equipped for diagnosis. <b>Methods:</b> As point-prevalence surveys (PPSs) are a well-known tool for assessing antimicrobial use, we adjusted standardized Global-PPS for use in two hospitals in Benin and included an analysis based on the 2021 WHO AWaRe classification. <b>Results:</b> Of the 450 patients enrolled, 148 received antimicrobials (AMs) (overall prevalence 32.9%), most of them orally (54.2%). Both hospitals had a high rate of Access and Watch antibiotics use, and both prescribed mainly metronidazole. In four prescriptions, hospital A used a non-recommended association of antibiotics, such as ceftriaxone + sulbactam and ofloxacin + ornidazole. While hospital A prescribed predominantly amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (19/92; 21%) and ceftriaxone (14/92; 15%), hospital B prescribed ampicillin (24/120; 20%) and cefuroxime (14/120; n = 12%). In hospital B, surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) was suboptimal. While there were no single-dose prophylaxis prescriptions, all one-day prophylaxis (SP2) involved ampicillin for cesarean sections. In patients in intensive care units, prolonged prophylaxis (>1 day, SP3) accounted for all postoperative prescriptions. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings highlight the critical need for implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs, expanding diagnostic laboratory capacity to minimize empirical prescribing, and strengthening medical student training to ensure quality and rational antibiotic use, thereby addressing the growing challenge of resistance in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health concern worldwide, particularly in low-to-middle-income countries with few antimicrobial stewardship programs and few laboratories equipped for diagnosis. Methods: As point-prevalence surveys (PPSs) are a well-known tool for assessing antimicrobial use, we adjusted standardized Global-PPS for use in two hospitals in Benin and included an analysis based on the 2021 WHO AWaRe classification. Results: Of the 450 patients enrolled, 148 received antimicrobials (AMs) (overall prevalence 32.9%), most of them orally (54.2%). Both hospitals had a high rate of Access and Watch antibiotics use, and both prescribed mainly metronidazole. In four prescriptions, hospital A used a non-recommended association of antibiotics, such as ceftriaxone + sulbactam and ofloxacin + ornidazole. While hospital A prescribed predominantly amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (19/92; 21%) and ceftriaxone (14/92; 15%), hospital B prescribed ampicillin (24/120; 20%) and cefuroxime (14/120; n = 12%). In hospital B, surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) was suboptimal. While there were no single-dose prophylaxis prescriptions, all one-day prophylaxis (SP2) involved ampicillin for cesarean sections. In patients in intensive care units, prolonged prophylaxis (>1 day, SP3) accounted for all postoperative prescriptions. Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical need for implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs, expanding diagnostic laboratory capacity to minimize empirical prescribing, and strengthening medical student training to ensure quality and rational antibiotic use, thereby addressing the growing challenge of resistance in resource-limited settings.

贝宁医院抗菌素使用点流行调查:抗菌素管理方案的必要性
背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是世界范围内的一个公共卫生问题,特别是在缺乏抗菌素管理规划和配备诊断实验室的中低收入国家。方法:由于点流行调查(PPSs)是评估抗菌药物使用情况的一种众所周知的工具,我们调整了贝宁两家医院使用的标准化全球pps,并纳入了基于2021年世卫组织AWaRe分类的分析。结果:在纳入的450例患者中,148例患者接受了抗微生物药物(AMs)治疗(总流行率32.9%),其中大多数患者口服(54.2%)。这两家医院的抗生素使用率都很高,而且都以甲硝唑为主。在4张处方中,A医院使用了头孢曲松+舒巴坦、氧氟沙星+奥硝唑等非推荐联合用药。A医院主要处方阿莫西林+克拉维酸(19/92;21%)和头孢曲松(14/92;15%), B医院开氨苄西林(24/120;20%)和头孢呋辛(14/120;N = 12%)。在B医院,外科抗菌预防(SAP)是次优的。虽然没有单剂量预防处方,但所有剖宫产的一天预防(SP2)都涉及氨苄西林。在重症监护病房的患者中,延长预防(bb10 1天,SP3)占所有术后处方。结论:这些发现强调了实施抗菌药物管理计划、扩大诊断实验室能力以最大限度地减少经验性处方、加强医学生培训以确保抗生素的质量和合理使用的迫切需要,从而解决资源有限环境中日益严峻的耐药性挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信