Helena Mocho, Cátia Martins, Rita Dos Santos, Elias Ratinho, Cristina Nunes
{"title":"Measuring Parental School Involvement: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Helena Mocho, Cátia Martins, Rita Dos Santos, Elias Ratinho, Cristina Nunes","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15060096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parental school involvement (PSI) is a multidimensional construct that significantly influences children's academic adjustment and overall development. However, inconsistencies persist in its definition and measurement, with researchers operationalizing PSI through a varied of parental activities. This study aimed to (1) identify PSI instruments and their theoretical models and (2) evaluate their psychometric properties. Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID CRD42023451091, registered August 2023), this systematic review examined six databases (Web of Science, ERIC, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo), analyzing quantitative studies from 2000 to 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed instruments designed for parents, teachers, or children aged 6-15 and published in peer-reviewed journals in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French. From an initial pool of 490 records, 38 studies were included, yielding 43 instruments: 23 for parents, 15 for children, and 5 for teachers. Seven instruments followed Epstein's model, while nine followed the Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler framework, underscoring the prominence of these theoretical approaches. The study quality, assessed with MMAT, was generally moderate to high. Despite an exhaustive search effort, it is possible that some relevant instruments were not identified. Nevertheless, this review advances the understanding of PSI operationalization, promotes more consistent and replicable assessments, enhances alignment between instruments and study objectives, and strengths the validity of findings derived from these tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15060096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parental school involvement (PSI) is a multidimensional construct that significantly influences children's academic adjustment and overall development. However, inconsistencies persist in its definition and measurement, with researchers operationalizing PSI through a varied of parental activities. This study aimed to (1) identify PSI instruments and their theoretical models and (2) evaluate their psychometric properties. Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID CRD42023451091, registered August 2023), this systematic review examined six databases (Web of Science, ERIC, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo), analyzing quantitative studies from 2000 to 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed instruments designed for parents, teachers, or children aged 6-15 and published in peer-reviewed journals in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French. From an initial pool of 490 records, 38 studies were included, yielding 43 instruments: 23 for parents, 15 for children, and 5 for teachers. Seven instruments followed Epstein's model, while nine followed the Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler framework, underscoring the prominence of these theoretical approaches. The study quality, assessed with MMAT, was generally moderate to high. Despite an exhaustive search effort, it is possible that some relevant instruments were not identified. Nevertheless, this review advances the understanding of PSI operationalization, promotes more consistent and replicable assessments, enhances alignment between instruments and study objectives, and strengths the validity of findings derived from these tools.
父母学校参与是一个多维的构念,对儿童的学业适应和全面发展有显著的影响。然而,在PSI的定义和测量上存在不一致,研究人员通过各种父母活动来实施PSI。本研究旨在(1)确定PSI工具及其理论模型;(2)评估其心理测量特性。遵循PRISMA指南(PROSPERO ID CRD42023451091,注册于2023年8月),本系统综述检查了6个数据库(Web of Science, ERIC, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycArticles和PsycInfo),分析了2000年至2024年的定量研究。纳入标准包括为家长、教师或6-15岁儿童设计的仪器,并以英语、葡萄牙语、西班牙语或法语发表在同行评议期刊上。从最初的490条记录中,纳入了38项研究,产生了43种工具:23种用于父母,15种用于儿童,5种用于教师。七种乐器遵循爱泼斯坦的模型,而九种遵循胡佛-邓普西和桑德勒的框架,强调了这些理论方法的重要性。MMAT评估的研究质量一般为中等至高。尽管进行了详尽的搜索,但仍有可能未查明一些相关的仪器。尽管如此,本综述促进了对PSI操作的理解,促进了更一致和可复制的评估,增强了工具和研究目标之间的一致性,并加强了这些工具得出的结果的有效性。