Structural and digestibility characterization of soybean protein, textured soybean-based protein and chicken breast: a comparative study.

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Food & Function Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1039/d4fo03963g
Yuxiang Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Kun Liu, Yan Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanfa Liu
{"title":"Structural and digestibility characterization of soybean protein, textured soybean-based protein and chicken breast: a comparative study.","authors":"Yuxiang Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Kun Liu, Yan Zhang, Chong Chen, Yuanfa Liu","doi":"10.1039/d4fo03963g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant-based meat analogs, primarily composed of textured vegetable proteins (TVPs), are potential alternatives to traditional meat. However, there is a lack of research on the digestibility properties of TVPs. This study involved processing soybean protein concentrate (SPC) into soybean-based high-moisture extruded TVPs (SH) and soybean-based low-moisture extruded TVPs (SL) through high-moisture (HM) extrusion and low-moisture (LM) extrusion, respectively. A comparison was then made between the structural and digestibility characteristics of SPC, SH, SL, and chicken breast. HM and LM extrusion transformed the soybean protein molecular structure from spherical into fibrous like in chicken breast, decreased its α-helix/β-sheet value from 0.68 ± 0.01 to 0.63 ± 0.01 and 0.60 ± 0.00, respectively, increased its intrinsic fluorescence maximum absorption wavelength from 341.4 nm to 352.2 nm and 350.2 nm, respectively, reduced its surface hydrophobicity index from 8665 ± 519 to 6723 ± 285 and 5167 ± 321, respectively, and greatly decreased the peptide molecular weight of digestive products. The findings suggested that, compared with natural SPC, soybean-based meat analogs were more similar to chicken breast in terms of appearance, protein molecular structure and digestibility characteristics, but there were still significant differences between the two. These results offered a scientific foundation for further exploration of plant-based meat alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":77,"journal":{"name":"Food & Function","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Function","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4fo03963g","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-based meat analogs, primarily composed of textured vegetable proteins (TVPs), are potential alternatives to traditional meat. However, there is a lack of research on the digestibility properties of TVPs. This study involved processing soybean protein concentrate (SPC) into soybean-based high-moisture extruded TVPs (SH) and soybean-based low-moisture extruded TVPs (SL) through high-moisture (HM) extrusion and low-moisture (LM) extrusion, respectively. A comparison was then made between the structural and digestibility characteristics of SPC, SH, SL, and chicken breast. HM and LM extrusion transformed the soybean protein molecular structure from spherical into fibrous like in chicken breast, decreased its α-helix/β-sheet value from 0.68 ± 0.01 to 0.63 ± 0.01 and 0.60 ± 0.00, respectively, increased its intrinsic fluorescence maximum absorption wavelength from 341.4 nm to 352.2 nm and 350.2 nm, respectively, reduced its surface hydrophobicity index from 8665 ± 519 to 6723 ± 285 and 5167 ± 321, respectively, and greatly decreased the peptide molecular weight of digestive products. The findings suggested that, compared with natural SPC, soybean-based meat analogs were more similar to chicken breast in terms of appearance, protein molecular structure and digestibility characteristics, but there were still significant differences between the two. These results offered a scientific foundation for further exploration of plant-based meat alternatives.

大豆蛋白、豆粕蛋白和鸡胸肉的结构和消化率比较研究。
以植物为基础的肉类类似物,主要由有纹理的植物蛋白(TVPs)组成,是传统肉类的潜在替代品。然而,对TVPs的消化特性研究较少。本研究将大豆浓缩蛋白(SPC)分别通过高湿(HM)挤压和低湿(LM)挤压加工成大豆基高湿挤压tfp (SH)和大豆基低湿挤压tfp (SL)。然后比较SPC、SH、SL和鸡胸肉的结构和消化率特性。HM和LM挤压使大豆蛋白的分子结构由球形变为纤维状,α-螺旋/β-片值分别从0.68±0.01降低到0.63±0.01和0.60±0.00,其本征荧光最大吸收波长分别从341.4 nm提高到352.2 nm和350.2 nm,表面疏水性指数分别从8665±519降低到6723±285和5167±321。并大大降低了消化产物的肽分子量。综上所述,与天然SPC相比,以大豆为基础的肉类类似物在外观、蛋白质分子结构和消化率特征上更接近鸡胸肉,但两者之间仍存在显著差异。这些结果为进一步探索植物性肉类替代品提供了科学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food & Function
Food & Function BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
957
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Food & Function provides a unique venue for physicists, chemists, biochemists, nutritionists and other food scientists to publish work at the interface of the chemistry, physics and biology of food. The journal focuses on food and the functions of food in relation to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信