Factors Affecting Psychiatric Bed Utilisation by People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Time Series Analysis Using the English National Mental Health Services Data Set.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Atiyya Nisar, Paul A Thompson, Harm Boer, Haider Al-Delfi, Peter E Langdon
{"title":"Factors Affecting Psychiatric Bed Utilisation by People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Time Series Analysis Using the English National Mental Health Services Data Set.","authors":"Atiyya Nisar, Paul A Thompson, Harm Boer, Haider Al-Delfi, Peter E Langdon","doi":"10.1111/jir.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2015, the Building the Right Support programme was launched for England in an attempt to reduce the number of psychiatric inpatients with intellectual disabilities and/or autism by 35%-50%. This target, and subsequent targets, were missed, and for 2025-2026, the government further committed to reducing numbers by 10%. Considering these continued targets, we aimed to investigate psychiatric bed utilisation over time, and to further understand factors that may influence psychiatric admissions and discharges of people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism, by utilising time series modelling with national English data to explore the relationship between a set of chosen sociodemographic, clinical and service-related predictor variables and the following outcome variables: (1) total monthly number of hospital spells, (2) total monthly number of discharges, (3) total monthly number of admissions, (4) ratio of community to non-community discharges, (5) number of inpatients with a length of stay under 2 years, (6) number of patients with a length of stay over 2 years and (7) total number of distinct individuals who had been subjected to restraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the publicly available Mental Health Services Data set, we utilised linear regression (with moving average or auto-regressive errors) to examine the relationships between variables over time, from February 2013 to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over time, the number of inpatients decreased by an average of 4.55 patients per month. The number of inpatients with a length of stay greater than 2 years reduced over time. Periods of time when the number of inpatients was greater were associated with more inpatients under the age of 18 years. Periods of time when hospital stays, admissions and discharges were higher were associated with fewer White inpatients relative to non-White inpatients. Periods of time with more patients detained under Part II of the Mental Health Act were associated with more admissions and the increased use of restraint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over the last 11 years, the planned closure of psychiatric inpatient beds has been unsuccessful. Our findings indicated that periods of increased psychiatric bed utilisation were associated with more admissions of younger people, non-White inpatients and those likely to be experiencing a crisis. Future research should explore how psychiatric beds can be utilised more effectively alongside community-based services and long-term trajectories using participant level data.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2015, the Building the Right Support programme was launched for England in an attempt to reduce the number of psychiatric inpatients with intellectual disabilities and/or autism by 35%-50%. This target, and subsequent targets, were missed, and for 2025-2026, the government further committed to reducing numbers by 10%. Considering these continued targets, we aimed to investigate psychiatric bed utilisation over time, and to further understand factors that may influence psychiatric admissions and discharges of people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism, by utilising time series modelling with national English data to explore the relationship between a set of chosen sociodemographic, clinical and service-related predictor variables and the following outcome variables: (1) total monthly number of hospital spells, (2) total monthly number of discharges, (3) total monthly number of admissions, (4) ratio of community to non-community discharges, (5) number of inpatients with a length of stay under 2 years, (6) number of patients with a length of stay over 2 years and (7) total number of distinct individuals who had been subjected to restraints.

Methods: Using data from the publicly available Mental Health Services Data set, we utilised linear regression (with moving average or auto-regressive errors) to examine the relationships between variables over time, from February 2013 to January 2024.

Results: Over time, the number of inpatients decreased by an average of 4.55 patients per month. The number of inpatients with a length of stay greater than 2 years reduced over time. Periods of time when the number of inpatients was greater were associated with more inpatients under the age of 18 years. Periods of time when hospital stays, admissions and discharges were higher were associated with fewer White inpatients relative to non-White inpatients. Periods of time with more patients detained under Part II of the Mental Health Act were associated with more admissions and the increased use of restraint.

Conclusions: Over the last 11 years, the planned closure of psychiatric inpatient beds has been unsuccessful. Our findings indicated that periods of increased psychiatric bed utilisation were associated with more admissions of younger people, non-White inpatients and those likely to be experiencing a crisis. Future research should explore how psychiatric beds can be utilised more effectively alongside community-based services and long-term trajectories using participant level data.

影响智障人士精神科病床使用率的因素:使用英国国家精神卫生服务数据集的时间序列分析
背景:2015年,英国启动了“建立正确的支持”项目,试图将智力残疾和/或自闭症的精神病住院患者数量减少35%-50%。这一目标以及随后的目标都未能实现,而在2025-2026年,政府进一步承诺将数量减少10%。考虑到这些持续的目标,我们的目标是调查精神科病床的使用率,并进一步了解可能影响智力残疾和/或自闭症患者入院和出院的因素,通过使用国家英语数据的时间序列模型来探索一组选定的社会人口统计学、临床和服务相关预测变量与以下结果变量之间的关系:(1)每月住院总次数,(2)每月出院总次数,(3)每月住院总次数,(4)社区与非社区出院的比率,(5)住院时间在2年以下的患者人数,(6)住院时间在2年以上的患者人数,(7)受到限制的不同个体的总人数。方法:从2013年2月至2024年1月,使用公开的精神卫生服务数据集的数据,我们使用线性回归(带有移动平均或自回归误差)来检查变量之间随时间的关系。结果:随着时间的推移,住院人数平均每月减少4.55例。住院时间大于2年的患者数量随着时间的推移而减少。住院患者数量较多的时间段与18岁以下住院患者较多相关。与非白人住院患者相比,住院时间、入院和出院时间越长,白人住院患者越少。根据《精神卫生法》第二部分拘留更多病人的时间与更多入院和更多使用约束有关。结论:在过去的11年里,计划关闭精神科住院床位是不成功的。我们的研究结果表明,精神病病床使用率的增加与年轻人、非白人住院病人和那些可能经历危机的人的入院率有关。未来的研究应该探索如何更有效地利用精神科病床与社区服务以及使用参与者水平数据的长期轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信