Comparative analysis of nutritional ingredients of muscle in Pseudobagrus ussuriensis under pond and wild conditions

IF 4.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Bingke Wang , Yanhui Wang , Jun Lv , Ling Zhang , Kaisong Zhang , Xingli Yang , Zhaoping Wang , Chunnuan Zhang , Qin Zhang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of nutritional ingredients of muscle in Pseudobagrus ussuriensis under pond and wild conditions","authors":"Bingke Wang ,&nbsp;Yanhui Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Lv ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Kaisong Zhang ,&nbsp;Xingli Yang ,&nbsp;Zhaoping Wang ,&nbsp;Chunnuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Qin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compared muscle nutritional components of pond-cultured and wild <em>Pseudobagrus ussuriensis</em>. Wild group exhibited superior texture properties (adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness, resilience) compared to pond group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Wild group exhibited higher crude ash, lipid, and protein content but lower moisture (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The muscle linolenic acid (C18:3n3), SFA (saturated fatty acids), n-3PUFA (n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and n3/n6 of the pond group were significantly lower, while the muscle linoleic acid (C18:2n6), PUFA and n-6PUFA contents were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the wild group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The total amino acids (TAA), essential amino acids (EAA) and delicious amino acids (DAA) contents of muscle in wild group were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the pond group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The muscle essential amino acid index (EAAI) was above 70 % in both pond (71.76 %) and wild groups (78.78 %), which was a high-quality protein source. Pond group contained higher Fe, Na, and P but lower Se than wild group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). These findings highlighted the superior nutritional profile of wild <em>Pseudobagrus ussuriensis</em> muscle, providing a meaningful reference for consumers and a direction for future research on feed nutrition of <em>Pseudobagrus ussuriensis</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107954"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157525007690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared muscle nutritional components of pond-cultured and wild Pseudobagrus ussuriensis. Wild group exhibited superior texture properties (adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness, resilience) compared to pond group (P < 0.05). Wild group exhibited higher crude ash, lipid, and protein content but lower moisture (P < 0.05). The muscle linolenic acid (C18:3n3), SFA (saturated fatty acids), n-3PUFA (n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and n3/n6 of the pond group were significantly lower, while the muscle linoleic acid (C18:2n6), PUFA and n-6PUFA contents were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the wild group (P < 0.05). The total amino acids (TAA), essential amino acids (EAA) and delicious amino acids (DAA) contents of muscle in wild group were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the pond group (P < 0.05). The muscle essential amino acid index (EAAI) was above 70 % in both pond (71.76 %) and wild groups (78.78 %), which was a high-quality protein source. Pond group contained higher Fe, Na, and P but lower Se than wild group (P < 0.05). These findings highlighted the superior nutritional profile of wild Pseudobagrus ussuriensis muscle, providing a meaningful reference for consumers and a direction for future research on feed nutrition of Pseudobagrus ussuriensis.
池塘与野生条件下乌苏里拟袋鱼肌肉营养成分的比较分析
本研究比较了池养和野生乌苏里假袋鱼的肌肉营养成分。野生组的质地性能(黏附性、弹性、内聚性、咀嚼性、回弹性)优于池塘组(P <; 0.05)。野生组粗灰分、脂肪和蛋白质含量较高,水分含量较低(P <; 0.05)。池塘组肌肉亚麻酸(C18:3n3)、饱和脂肪酸(SFA)、n-3PUFA (n-3多不饱和脂肪酸)、二十碳五烯酸(EPA)、二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)和n3/n6含量显著低于野生组(P <; 0.05),而肌肉亚油酸(C18:2n6)、PUFA和n-6PUFA含量显著高于野生组(P < 0.05)。野生组肌肉总氨基酸(TAA)、必需氨基酸(EAA)和美味氨基酸(DAA)含量显著高于池塘组(P <; 0.05)。池塘组(71.76 %)和野生组(78.78 %)肌肉必需氨基酸指数(EAAI)均在70 %以上,是优质的蛋白质来源。塘组铁、钠、磷含量高于野生组,硒含量低于野生组(P <; 0.05)。这些发现凸显了野生乌苏里假袋肌优越的营养特性,为消费者提供了有意义的参考,也为今后乌苏里假袋饲料营养的研究指明了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects. The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信