Bingke Wang , Yanhui Wang , Jun Lv , Ling Zhang , Kaisong Zhang , Xingli Yang , Zhaoping Wang , Chunnuan Zhang , Qin Zhang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of nutritional ingredients of muscle in Pseudobagrus ussuriensis under pond and wild conditions","authors":"Bingke Wang , Yanhui Wang , Jun Lv , Ling Zhang , Kaisong Zhang , Xingli Yang , Zhaoping Wang , Chunnuan Zhang , Qin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compared muscle nutritional components of pond-cultured and wild <em>Pseudobagrus ussuriensis</em>. Wild group exhibited superior texture properties (adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness, resilience) compared to pond group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Wild group exhibited higher crude ash, lipid, and protein content but lower moisture (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The muscle linolenic acid (C18:3n3), SFA (saturated fatty acids), n-3PUFA (n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and n3/n6 of the pond group were significantly lower, while the muscle linoleic acid (C18:2n6), PUFA and n-6PUFA contents were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the wild group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The total amino acids (TAA), essential amino acids (EAA) and delicious amino acids (DAA) contents of muscle in wild group were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the pond group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). The muscle essential amino acid index (EAAI) was above 70 % in both pond (71.76 %) and wild groups (78.78 %), which was a high-quality protein source. Pond group contained higher Fe, Na, and P but lower Se than wild group (<em>P</em> < 0.05). These findings highlighted the superior nutritional profile of wild <em>Pseudobagrus ussuriensis</em> muscle, providing a meaningful reference for consumers and a direction for future research on feed nutrition of <em>Pseudobagrus ussuriensis</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107954"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157525007690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compared muscle nutritional components of pond-cultured and wild Pseudobagrus ussuriensis. Wild group exhibited superior texture properties (adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness, resilience) compared to pond group (P < 0.05). Wild group exhibited higher crude ash, lipid, and protein content but lower moisture (P < 0.05). The muscle linolenic acid (C18:3n3), SFA (saturated fatty acids), n-3PUFA (n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and n3/n6 of the pond group were significantly lower, while the muscle linoleic acid (C18:2n6), PUFA and n-6PUFA contents were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the wild group (P < 0.05). The total amino acids (TAA), essential amino acids (EAA) and delicious amino acids (DAA) contents of muscle in wild group were found to be markedly higher compared to those of the pond group (P < 0.05). The muscle essential amino acid index (EAAI) was above 70 % in both pond (71.76 %) and wild groups (78.78 %), which was a high-quality protein source. Pond group contained higher Fe, Na, and P but lower Se than wild group (P < 0.05). These findings highlighted the superior nutritional profile of wild Pseudobagrus ussuriensis muscle, providing a meaningful reference for consumers and a direction for future research on feed nutrition of Pseudobagrus ussuriensis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects.
The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.