Hajime Yoshida , Takeo Ebina , Akira Ono , Tetsuji Itoh
{"title":"Comparison of water vapor transmission rates using different measurement methods","authors":"Hajime Yoshida , Takeo Ebina , Akira Ono , Tetsuji Itoh","doi":"10.1016/j.measurement.2025.118180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water vapor transmission rates of films were measured by Japanese testing laboratories and the authors using six different methods. The results were analyzed through comparison. The measurement range was from 10<sup>−3</sup> to 20 g m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> at 40 °C and 90 % relative humidity. Two commercially available clay nanocomposite gas barrier films and three reference films with a small hole were used as samples. The measurements agreed within ±30 % in the range from 1 to 20 g m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> and within ±50 % at around 0.1 g m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>. The agreement declined as the water vapor transmission rate decreased. The maximum differences were approximately 13-fold in the measurements of less than 0.1 g m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>. The origin of these differences was discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18349,"journal":{"name":"Measurement","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 118180"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224125015398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water vapor transmission rates of films were measured by Japanese testing laboratories and the authors using six different methods. The results were analyzed through comparison. The measurement range was from 10−3 to 20 g m−2 day−1 at 40 °C and 90 % relative humidity. Two commercially available clay nanocomposite gas barrier films and three reference films with a small hole were used as samples. The measurements agreed within ±30 % in the range from 1 to 20 g m−2 day−1 and within ±50 % at around 0.1 g m−2 day−1. The agreement declined as the water vapor transmission rate decreased. The maximum differences were approximately 13-fold in the measurements of less than 0.1 g m−2 day−1. The origin of these differences was discussed.
日本测试实验室和作者使用六种不同的方法测量了薄膜的水蒸气透射率。通过对比分析结果。在40°C和90%相对湿度下,测量范围为10−3 ~ 20 g m−2 day−1。以两种市售粘土纳米复合气障膜和三种带小孔的参考膜为样品。测量结果在1至20 g m−2 day−1范围内的误差在±30%以内,在0.1 g m−2 day−1范围内的误差在±50%以内。随着水蒸气透过率的降低,一致性降低。在小于0.1 g m−2 day−1的测量值中,最大差异约为13倍。讨论了这些差异的起源。
期刊介绍:
Contributions are invited on novel achievements in all fields of measurement and instrumentation science and technology. Authors are encouraged to submit novel material, whose ultimate goal is an advancement in the state of the art of: measurement and metrology fundamentals, sensors, measurement instruments, measurement and estimation techniques, measurement data processing and fusion algorithms, evaluation procedures and methodologies for plants and industrial processes, performance analysis of systems, processes and algorithms, mathematical models for measurement-oriented purposes, distributed measurement systems in a connected world.