Current treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids: available evidence and therapeutic dilemmas

Noa S de Smit, Maria E de Lange, Martijn F Boomsma, Judith A F Huirne, Wouter J K Hehenkamp
{"title":"Current treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids: available evidence and therapeutic dilemmas","authors":"Noa S de Smit, Maria E de Lange, Martijn F Boomsma, Judith A F Huirne, Wouter J K Hehenkamp","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00728-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Review offers an evaluation of current treatments for symptomatic uterine fibroids, including uterine artery embolisation, MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation, transcervical radiofrequency ablation, ulipristal acetate, and oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists with add-back therapy. Placing these therapies within the IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, And Long-Term Follow-Up) framework and the clinical phases of drug development framework, we highlight key gaps in the evidence such as the lack of head-to-head comparisons with standard care, scarce long-term data, and inadequate consideration of real-world fibroid and patient characteristics. We provide a clear overview, assess the strength of the available evidence, and propose a practical flowchart to help clinicians navigate treatment decisions, ensuring the best care for women with symptomatic fibroids at various stages of therapy development. Insight into these matters equips both patient and clinician with essential information to support the process of shared and fully informed decision making. Importantly, this Review also identifies knowledge gaps that contribute to the specification of the fibroid research agenda.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00728-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Review offers an evaluation of current treatments for symptomatic uterine fibroids, including uterine artery embolisation, MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation, transcervical radiofrequency ablation, ulipristal acetate, and oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists with add-back therapy. Placing these therapies within the IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, And Long-Term Follow-Up) framework and the clinical phases of drug development framework, we highlight key gaps in the evidence such as the lack of head-to-head comparisons with standard care, scarce long-term data, and inadequate consideration of real-world fibroid and patient characteristics. We provide a clear overview, assess the strength of the available evidence, and propose a practical flowchart to help clinicians navigate treatment decisions, ensuring the best care for women with symptomatic fibroids at various stages of therapy development. Insight into these matters equips both patient and clinician with essential information to support the process of shared and fully informed decision making. Importantly, this Review also identifies knowledge gaps that contribute to the specification of the fibroid research agenda.
目前治疗症状性子宫肌瘤:现有证据和治疗困境
本文综述了目前治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的方法,包括子宫动脉栓塞、mri引导下的高强度聚焦超声、腹腔镜射频消融术、经宫颈射频消融术、醋酸ulipristal和口服促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂加回治疗。将这些疗法置于IDEAL (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, And长期随访)框架和药物开发的临床阶段框架中,我们强调了证据中的关键空白,例如缺乏与标准治疗的正面比较,缺乏长期数据,以及对真实肌瘤和患者特征的考虑不足。我们提供了一个清晰的概述,评估现有证据的强度,并提出了一个实用的流程图,以帮助临床医生导航治疗决策,确保在治疗发展的各个阶段对有症状的肌瘤妇女的最佳护理。对这些问题的洞察为患者和临床医生提供了必要的信息,以支持共享和充分知情的决策过程。重要的是,本综述还确定了有助于肌瘤研究议程规范的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信