Smartphone Applications for Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Telma Cruz, Cristiana Duarte, Tiago B Ferreira, Carina Santos, Mariana V Martins
{"title":"Smartphone Applications for Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Telma Cruz, Cristiana Duarte, Tiago B Ferreira, Carina Santos, Mariana V Martins","doi":"10.1002/eat.24488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the rising prevalence of eating disorders (EDs), smartphone applications (apps) have received growing clinical attention, but their overall effectiveness remains undetermined. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of app interventions for EDs and to identify the psychological approaches featured in these interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The online databases SCOPUS, PubMed, and EBSCO were searched for trials published up to February 2025. This review followed PRISMA guidelines, and meta-analyses were conducted using post-intervention assessment data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 14 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Trials involving not formally diagnosed samples indicated that app-based interventions were more efficacious than controls in reducing global levels of ED symptomatology, shape and weight concerns, dietary restraint, binge eating, and compensatory behaviors. No significant effects were found for body dissatisfaction/disturbance or drive for thinness. Self-help interventions showed generally comparable improvements. In formally diagnosed samples, only objective binge eating was analyzed, with a medium effect observed when the app was incorporated into guided self-help. The use of an adjunctive app was not shown to have benefit above and beyond traditional therapy. Most interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy principles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review supports the efficacy of app-based interventions in reducing key ED symptoms, particularly within the binge-eating spectrum and among at-risk individuals. Nonetheless, given the limited number of studies, further research with high-quality RCTs, larger samples, and proper follow-ups is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Given the rising prevalence of eating disorders (EDs), smartphone applications (apps) have received growing clinical attention, but their overall effectiveness remains undetermined. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of app interventions for EDs and to identify the psychological approaches featured in these interventions.

Method: The online databases SCOPUS, PubMed, and EBSCO were searched for trials published up to February 2025. This review followed PRISMA guidelines, and meta-analyses were conducted using post-intervention assessment data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 14 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Trials involving not formally diagnosed samples indicated that app-based interventions were more efficacious than controls in reducing global levels of ED symptomatology, shape and weight concerns, dietary restraint, binge eating, and compensatory behaviors. No significant effects were found for body dissatisfaction/disturbance or drive for thinness. Self-help interventions showed generally comparable improvements. In formally diagnosed samples, only objective binge eating was analyzed, with a medium effect observed when the app was incorporated into guided self-help. The use of an adjunctive app was not shown to have benefit above and beyond traditional therapy. Most interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy principles.

Discussion: This review supports the efficacy of app-based interventions in reducing key ED symptoms, particularly within the binge-eating spectrum and among at-risk individuals. Nonetheless, given the limited number of studies, further research with high-quality RCTs, larger samples, and proper follow-ups is needed.

智能手机应用于饮食失调:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:鉴于饮食失调症(EDs)的患病率不断上升,智能手机应用程序(app)得到了越来越多的临床关注,但其整体有效性仍不确定。本研究旨在对随机对照试验(rct)进行荟萃分析,评估应用程序干预ed的疗效,并确定这些干预措施的心理方法。方法:检索截至2025年2月发表的SCOPUS、PubMed和EBSCO在线数据库。本综述遵循PRISMA指南,使用干预后评估数据进行meta分析。合并效应量以95%置信区间计算。结果:17项研究符合纳入标准,14项纳入定量综合。涉及未正式诊断样本的试验表明,基于应用程序的干预在降低ED症状、体型和体重问题、饮食限制、暴饮暴食和代偿行为的全球水平方面比对照组更有效。没有发现对身体不满/不安或对瘦的驱动有显著影响。自助干预总体上显示出类似的改善。在正式诊断的样本中,只分析了客观的暴饮暴食,当应用程序被纳入指导自助时,观察到中等效果。使用辅助应用程序并没有显示出优于传统治疗的益处。大多数干预都是基于认知行为治疗原则。讨论:本综述支持基于app的干预措施在减少关键ED症状方面的有效性,特别是在暴饮暴食和高危人群中。尽管如此,鉴于研究数量有限,需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验,更大的样本和适当的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信