Telma Cruz, Cristiana Duarte, Tiago B Ferreira, Carina Santos, Mariana V Martins
{"title":"Smartphone Applications for Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Telma Cruz, Cristiana Duarte, Tiago B Ferreira, Carina Santos, Mariana V Martins","doi":"10.1002/eat.24488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the rising prevalence of eating disorders (EDs), smartphone applications (apps) have received growing clinical attention, but their overall effectiveness remains undetermined. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of app interventions for EDs and to identify the psychological approaches featured in these interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The online databases SCOPUS, PubMed, and EBSCO were searched for trials published up to February 2025. This review followed PRISMA guidelines, and meta-analyses were conducted using post-intervention assessment data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 14 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Trials involving not formally diagnosed samples indicated that app-based interventions were more efficacious than controls in reducing global levels of ED symptomatology, shape and weight concerns, dietary restraint, binge eating, and compensatory behaviors. No significant effects were found for body dissatisfaction/disturbance or drive for thinness. Self-help interventions showed generally comparable improvements. In formally diagnosed samples, only objective binge eating was analyzed, with a medium effect observed when the app was incorporated into guided self-help. The use of an adjunctive app was not shown to have benefit above and beyond traditional therapy. Most interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy principles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review supports the efficacy of app-based interventions in reducing key ED symptoms, particularly within the binge-eating spectrum and among at-risk individuals. Nonetheless, given the limited number of studies, further research with high-quality RCTs, larger samples, and proper follow-ups is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Given the rising prevalence of eating disorders (EDs), smartphone applications (apps) have received growing clinical attention, but their overall effectiveness remains undetermined. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of app interventions for EDs and to identify the psychological approaches featured in these interventions.
Method: The online databases SCOPUS, PubMed, and EBSCO were searched for trials published up to February 2025. This review followed PRISMA guidelines, and meta-analyses were conducted using post-intervention assessment data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 14 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Trials involving not formally diagnosed samples indicated that app-based interventions were more efficacious than controls in reducing global levels of ED symptomatology, shape and weight concerns, dietary restraint, binge eating, and compensatory behaviors. No significant effects were found for body dissatisfaction/disturbance or drive for thinness. Self-help interventions showed generally comparable improvements. In formally diagnosed samples, only objective binge eating was analyzed, with a medium effect observed when the app was incorporated into guided self-help. The use of an adjunctive app was not shown to have benefit above and beyond traditional therapy. Most interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy principles.
Discussion: This review supports the efficacy of app-based interventions in reducing key ED symptoms, particularly within the binge-eating spectrum and among at-risk individuals. Nonetheless, given the limited number of studies, further research with high-quality RCTs, larger samples, and proper follow-ups is needed.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.