Divisive attenuation based on noisy sensorimotor predictions accounts for excess variability in self-touch.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Nicola Valè, Ivan Tomic, Zahara Gironés, Daniel M Wolpert, Konstantina Kilteni, Paul M Bays
{"title":"Divisive attenuation based on noisy sensorimotor predictions accounts for excess variability in self-touch.","authors":"Nicola Valè, Ivan Tomic, Zahara Gironés, Daniel M Wolpert, Konstantina Kilteni, Paul M Bays","doi":"10.1152/jn.00055.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When one part of the body exerts force on another, the resulting tactile sensation is perceived as weaker than when the same force is applied by an external agent. This phenomenon has been studied using a force matching task, in which observers are first exposed to an external force on a passive finger and then instructed to reproduce the sensation by directly pressing on the passive finger with a finger of the other hand: healthy participants consistently exceed the original force level. However, this exaggeration of the target force is not observed if the observer generates the matching force indirectly, by adjusting a joystick or slider that controls the force output of a motor. Here we present the first detailed computational account of the processes leading to exaggeration of target forces in the force matching task, incorporating attenuation of sensory signals based on motor predictions. The model elucidates previously unappreciated contributions of multiple sources of noise, including memory noise, in determining matching force output, and shows that quantifying attenuation as the discrepancy between direct and indirect self-generated forces isolates its predictive component. Our computational account makes the prediction that attenuated sensations will display greater trial-to-trial variability than unattenuated ones, because they incorporate additional noise from motor prediction. Quantitative model fitting of new and existing force matching data confirmed the prediction of excess variability in self-generated forces and provided evidence for a divisive rather than subtractive mechanism of attenuation, while highlighting its predictive nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00055.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When one part of the body exerts force on another, the resulting tactile sensation is perceived as weaker than when the same force is applied by an external agent. This phenomenon has been studied using a force matching task, in which observers are first exposed to an external force on a passive finger and then instructed to reproduce the sensation by directly pressing on the passive finger with a finger of the other hand: healthy participants consistently exceed the original force level. However, this exaggeration of the target force is not observed if the observer generates the matching force indirectly, by adjusting a joystick or slider that controls the force output of a motor. Here we present the first detailed computational account of the processes leading to exaggeration of target forces in the force matching task, incorporating attenuation of sensory signals based on motor predictions. The model elucidates previously unappreciated contributions of multiple sources of noise, including memory noise, in determining matching force output, and shows that quantifying attenuation as the discrepancy between direct and indirect self-generated forces isolates its predictive component. Our computational account makes the prediction that attenuated sensations will display greater trial-to-trial variability than unattenuated ones, because they incorporate additional noise from motor prediction. Quantitative model fitting of new and existing force matching data confirmed the prediction of excess variability in self-generated forces and provided evidence for a divisive rather than subtractive mechanism of attenuation, while highlighting its predictive nature.

基于噪声感觉运动预测的分裂衰减解释了自触摸的过度变异性。
当身体的一部分对另一部分施加力时,产生的触觉感觉被认为比外部因素施加同样的力时要弱。这一现象已经通过一项力匹配任务进行了研究,在这项任务中,观察者首先暴露在被动手指上的外力,然后指示用另一只手的手指直接按压被动手指来重现这种感觉:健康的参与者始终超过原来的力水平。然而,如果观察者通过调节控制电机输出力的操纵杆或滑块间接产生匹配力,则不会观察到目标力的夸大。在这里,我们提出了导致力匹配任务中目标力夸大的过程的第一个详细的计算说明,包括基于运动预测的感觉信号衰减。该模型阐明了以前未被认识到的多种噪声源(包括记忆噪声)在确定匹配力输出方面的贡献,并表明将衰减量化为直接和间接自生力之间的差异可以隔离其预测成分。我们的计算帐户预测,衰减的感觉将比未衰减的感觉表现出更大的试验差异,因为它们包含了来自运动预测的额外噪声。新的和现有的力匹配数据的定量模型拟合证实了对自生力的过度变率的预测,并为衰减的分裂而不是减法机制提供了证据,同时突出了其预测性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信