Healthcare professionals' perception of the ketogenic diet among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-06-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2025.1558151
Saleha Alqarni, Eatedal Eenizan Alsaeedi, Rayan A Siraj, Yousef Saad Aldabayan, Amal Ismael Abdelhafez
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' perception of the ketogenic diet among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Saleha Alqarni, Eatedal Eenizan Alsaeedi, Rayan A Siraj, Yousef Saad Aldabayan, Amal Ismael Abdelhafez","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2025.1558151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory disorder characterized by persistent inflammation and airflow limitation. The ketogenic diet (KD), recognized for its anti-inflammatory properties, has potential therapeutic benefits for COPD management. However, healthcare professionals' perceptions of KD's efficacy and applicability in COPD care remain underexplored, particularly in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between June and September 2024, targeting healthcare professionals involved in COPD management. The survey evaluated perceptions of KD's benefits, limitations, and current nutritional practices. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed using JASP to identify predictors of KD training uptake and the likelihood of discussing dietary interventions with COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,068 healthcare professionals participated in the survey. Of these, 58% believed KD could improve quality of life in COPD patients, and 61% acknowledged its potential to reduce inflammation. Logistic regression identified familiarity with KD as significant predictor for receiving KD training (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Concerns regarding KD's adverse effects, such as constipation and dehydration, were noted by 76% of respondents. Only 14% reported recommending KD, citing insufficient evidence and lack of professional training as primary barriers. Additionally, 74% highlighted patient adherence challenges due to KD's restrictive nature and potential side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KD shows promise as a complementary therapy for COPD by modulating inflammation and improving symptom management. Addressing barriers such as limited evidence and inadequate professional training is essential. Further research is required to establish the efficacy and safety of KD in COPD care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"1558151"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1558151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory disorder characterized by persistent inflammation and airflow limitation. The ketogenic diet (KD), recognized for its anti-inflammatory properties, has potential therapeutic benefits for COPD management. However, healthcare professionals' perceptions of KD's efficacy and applicability in COPD care remain underexplored, particularly in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between June and September 2024, targeting healthcare professionals involved in COPD management. The survey evaluated perceptions of KD's benefits, limitations, and current nutritional practices. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed using JASP to identify predictors of KD training uptake and the likelihood of discussing dietary interventions with COPD patients.

Results: A total of 1,068 healthcare professionals participated in the survey. Of these, 58% believed KD could improve quality of life in COPD patients, and 61% acknowledged its potential to reduce inflammation. Logistic regression identified familiarity with KD as significant predictor for receiving KD training (p < 0.001). Concerns regarding KD's adverse effects, such as constipation and dehydration, were noted by 76% of respondents. Only 14% reported recommending KD, citing insufficient evidence and lack of professional training as primary barriers. Additionally, 74% highlighted patient adherence challenges due to KD's restrictive nature and potential side effects.

Conclusion: KD shows promise as a complementary therapy for COPD by modulating inflammation and improving symptom management. Addressing barriers such as limited evidence and inadequate professional training is essential. Further research is required to establish the efficacy and safety of KD in COPD care.

卫生保健专业人员对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生酮饮食的看法:一项横断面研究。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种以持续炎症和气流限制为特征的进行性呼吸系统疾病。生酮饮食(KD)因其抗炎特性而被公认,对COPD治疗具有潜在的治疗益处。然而,医疗保健专业人员对KD在COPD治疗中的疗效和适用性的看法仍未得到充分探讨,特别是在沙特阿拉伯。方法:在2024年6月至9月期间进行了一项横断面在线调查,目标是参与COPD管理的医疗保健专业人员。该调查评估了KD的益处、局限性和当前营养实践的看法。使用JASP进行描述性统计和逻辑回归分析,以确定KD训练摄取的预测因子和COPD患者讨论饮食干预的可能性。结果:共有1068名医护人员参与调查。其中,58%的人认为KD可以改善COPD患者的生活质量,61%的人认为KD有减少炎症的潜力。Logistic回归发现熟悉KD是接受KD训练的显著预测因子(p < 0.001)。76%的受访者注意到KD的不良反应,如便秘和脱水。只有14%的人推荐KD,理由是证据不足和缺乏专业培训是主要障碍。此外,74%的受访者强调,由于KD的限制性和潜在的副作用,患者的依从性面临挑战。结论:KD通过调节炎症和改善症状管理,有望作为COPD的补充疗法。解决证据有限和专业培训不足等障碍至关重要。需要进一步的研究来确定KD在COPD治疗中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信