Psychological Distress Trajectories in Residential Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Emma L. Hatton, Peter J. Kelly, Laura Robinson, Alison Beck, Mei L. Lee, Robert Stirling, Lauren Mullaney, Michele Campbell, Briony Larance
{"title":"Psychological Distress Trajectories in Residential Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment","authors":"Emma L. Hatton,&nbsp;Peter J. Kelly,&nbsp;Laura Robinson,&nbsp;Alison Beck,&nbsp;Mei L. Lee,&nbsp;Robert Stirling,&nbsp;Lauren Mullaney,&nbsp;Michele Campbell,&nbsp;Briony Larance","doi":"10.1111/dar.14099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Residential clients frequently report high psychological distress at intake, but little is known about changes in distress throughout treatment. This study aimed to identify in-treatment trajectories for psychological distress and factors associated with trajectory classes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort of adults attending Australian non-government residential substance use treatment between 2012 and 2023 was identified from routinely collected data, NADAbase. Participants (<i>N</i> = 1492) completed ≥ 3 Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10) assessments within 90 days of intake. Latent growth curve analyses identified classes of K10 trajectories. Multinomial regression identified demographic and clinical correlates (Severity of Dependence Scale [SDS] and EUROHIS Quality of Life scale [EQoL-8]) of class membership.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A five-class model describing K10 trajectories (1: moderate–low improved; 2: high–low improved; 3: very high–moderate improved; 4: very high–high improved; 5: very high unchanged) had the best model fit. Compared to high–low improved (34.5%; referent), moderate–low improved (45.4%) were less likely to identify as female, have higher SDS and lower EQoL-8 scores, or use cannabis; very high–moderate improved (13.1%) were more likely to have lower SDS scores, be aged under 25 and use opioids; very high–high improved (5.6%) were less likely to identify as male, be aged over 25, have higher EQoL and SDS scores; and very high unchanged (1.3%) were more likely to have lower EQoL scores and have left without completing treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Four K10 trajectory classes showed improvement after 90 days. Around 7% reported sustained high to very high psychological distress. Routine monitoring of psychological distress provides opportunities to identify non-improving clients and review treatment plans to improve outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 5","pages":"1308-1320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Residential clients frequently report high psychological distress at intake, but little is known about changes in distress throughout treatment. This study aimed to identify in-treatment trajectories for psychological distress and factors associated with trajectory classes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of adults attending Australian non-government residential substance use treatment between 2012 and 2023 was identified from routinely collected data, NADAbase. Participants (N = 1492) completed ≥ 3 Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10) assessments within 90 days of intake. Latent growth curve analyses identified classes of K10 trajectories. Multinomial regression identified demographic and clinical correlates (Severity of Dependence Scale [SDS] and EUROHIS Quality of Life scale [EQoL-8]) of class membership.

Results

A five-class model describing K10 trajectories (1: moderate–low improved; 2: high–low improved; 3: very high–moderate improved; 4: very high–high improved; 5: very high unchanged) had the best model fit. Compared to high–low improved (34.5%; referent), moderate–low improved (45.4%) were less likely to identify as female, have higher SDS and lower EQoL-8 scores, or use cannabis; very high–moderate improved (13.1%) were more likely to have lower SDS scores, be aged under 25 and use opioids; very high–high improved (5.6%) were less likely to identify as male, be aged over 25, have higher EQoL and SDS scores; and very high unchanged (1.3%) were more likely to have lower EQoL scores and have left without completing treatment.

Discussion and Conclusions

Four K10 trajectory classes showed improvement after 90 days. Around 7% reported sustained high to very high psychological distress. Routine monitoring of psychological distress provides opportunities to identify non-improving clients and review treatment plans to improve outcomes.

Abstract Image

家庭酒精和其他药物治疗中的心理困扰轨迹。
简介:住院病人在入院时经常报告高心理困扰,但在整个治疗过程中对困扰的变化知之甚少。本研究旨在确定心理困扰的治疗轨迹和与轨迹类别相关的因素。方法:从NADAbase常规收集的数据中确定2012年至2023年期间参加澳大利亚非政府住宅药物使用治疗的成年人回顾性队列。参与者(N = 1492)在服药90天内完成了≥3项Kessler-10心理困扰量表(K10)评估。潜在生长曲线分析确定了K10轨迹的类别。多项回归确定了人口统计学和临床相关性(依赖严重程度量表[SDS]和EUROHIS生活质量量表[EQoL-8])。结果:一个描述K10轨迹的五类模型(1:中低改进;2:高-低改进;3:非常高-中度改善;4:非常高-高改进;5:非常高不变)有最好的模型拟合。相比高低改善(34.5%;参考),中低改善(45.4%)不太可能认同为女性,SDS较高,EQoL-8评分较低,或使用大麻;非常高-中度改善(13.1%)患者SDS评分较低、年龄在25岁以下、使用阿片类药物的可能性较大;非常高-高改善(5.6%)的患者不太可能认为自己是男性,年龄在25岁以上,EQoL和SDS得分较高;非常高不变(1.3%)的患者更有可能有较低的EQoL评分,并且没有完成治疗。讨论与结论:4个K10弹道类别在90天后均有改善。大约7%的人报告持续高到非常高的心理困扰。心理困扰的常规监测提供了机会,以确定没有改善的客户和审查治疗计划,以改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信