Assessing the nutritional value of farmed and wild gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): Implications for local aquaculture in the central Algerian coast
{"title":"Assessing the nutritional value of farmed and wild gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): Implications for local aquaculture in the central Algerian coast","authors":"Elyes Kelai , Soufiane Bensalem , Bilal Boufekane , Adh’ya-eddine Hamitouche , Khaldoun Bachari , Kamel Harchouche , Nour el Islam Bachari","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aquaculture is a sustainable alternative to traditional fishing, especially in the Mediterranean, where wild fish populations are declining. Consumer concerns about the nutritional value of farmed fish versus wild fish impede aquaculture development in Algeria. This study compares the nutritional value of farmed gilthead sea bream (<em>Sparus aurata</em>) in Algeria to wild fish. Samples were taken from four natural fishing areas and two fish farms. Biometric analysis revealed that farmed fish had positive allometric growth while wild fish had isometric growth. According to proximate composition analysis, wild fish contained more water (75.64 % vs. 70,6 %) and less organic matter (23.5 % vs. 26.2 %) than farmed fish. Fatty acid profiles analyzed with GC-MS in SIM mode revealed that farmed fish contained more omega-6 fatty acids (mean: 22.89 mg/100 mg), whereas wild fish had higher omega-3 levels (mean: 8.78 mg/100 mg). Despite these differences, both farmed and wild gilthead sea bream had high nutritional quality, particularly in omega-3 fatty acids. These findings indicate that farmed fish can be a high-quality alternative to wild fish in the Mediterranean region as long as feed formulations are optimized to better mimic wild fish lipid profiles. This study addresses consumer concerns and promotes sustainable aquaculture in Algeria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107944"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157525007598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aquaculture is a sustainable alternative to traditional fishing, especially in the Mediterranean, where wild fish populations are declining. Consumer concerns about the nutritional value of farmed fish versus wild fish impede aquaculture development in Algeria. This study compares the nutritional value of farmed gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) in Algeria to wild fish. Samples were taken from four natural fishing areas and two fish farms. Biometric analysis revealed that farmed fish had positive allometric growth while wild fish had isometric growth. According to proximate composition analysis, wild fish contained more water (75.64 % vs. 70,6 %) and less organic matter (23.5 % vs. 26.2 %) than farmed fish. Fatty acid profiles analyzed with GC-MS in SIM mode revealed that farmed fish contained more omega-6 fatty acids (mean: 22.89 mg/100 mg), whereas wild fish had higher omega-3 levels (mean: 8.78 mg/100 mg). Despite these differences, both farmed and wild gilthead sea bream had high nutritional quality, particularly in omega-3 fatty acids. These findings indicate that farmed fish can be a high-quality alternative to wild fish in the Mediterranean region as long as feed formulations are optimized to better mimic wild fish lipid profiles. This study addresses consumer concerns and promotes sustainable aquaculture in Algeria.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects.
The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.