Development and validation of the American Indian Multimedia Stimulus (AIMS) set for measuring cultural identity responding.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Danielle L Bethel, Nicole R Baughman, Mara J Demuth, Mariah Nacke, Lizbeth Rojas, Eric Mann, Gabe Cochran, Ricardo A Wilhelm, Rayus Kuplicki, Joanna O Shadlow, Gary L Lawrence, Terrence K Kominsky, Glenna P Stumblingbear-Riddle, Christopher Kemp, Miigis B Gonzalez, Melissa L Walls, Robin L Aupperle, Martin P Paulus, Evan J White
{"title":"Development and validation of the American Indian Multimedia Stimulus (AIMS) set for measuring cultural identity responding.","authors":"Danielle L Bethel, Nicole R Baughman, Mara J Demuth, Mariah Nacke, Lizbeth Rojas, Eric Mann, Gabe Cochran, Ricardo A Wilhelm, Rayus Kuplicki, Joanna O Shadlow, Gary L Lawrence, Terrence K Kominsky, Glenna P Stumblingbear-Riddle, Christopher Kemp, Miigis B Gonzalez, Melissa L Walls, Robin L Aupperle, Martin P Paulus, Evan J White","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Traditional cultural connection is an established protective factor in American Indian (AI) health research. Measurement of traditional cultural connection is primarily survey-based, limiting the ability to delineate underlying processes that may be important for advancing culturally grounded mental health prevention and intervention efforts. This study aimed to establish and validate a stimulus set to probe cultural identity and provide a framework for similar development in diverse cultures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 194 self-identified AI participants to view cultural and comparison stimuli across three media types (i.e., audio, video, and pictures). Participants rated each stimulus for arousal, valence, identity relevance, and cultural typicality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings showed cultural stimuli consistently evoked higher responses across media type and domain of reactivity than comparison stimuli (<i>p</i>s < .001, <i>d</i>s = 0.30-2.37). Identity ratings for cultural stimuli across all media types were directly correlated with self-report assessments of AI spirituality and enculturation (<i>r</i>s = 0.22-0.40, ps < .002) as well as inversely associated with acculturation (<i>r</i>s = -0.35 to -0.49, <i>p</i>s < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underline the potential of the devised stimulus set to effectively measure cultural connection in a heterogeneous AI population and offer a framework for broad cross-cultural application in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Traditional cultural connection is an established protective factor in American Indian (AI) health research. Measurement of traditional cultural connection is primarily survey-based, limiting the ability to delineate underlying processes that may be important for advancing culturally grounded mental health prevention and intervention efforts. This study aimed to establish and validate a stimulus set to probe cultural identity and provide a framework for similar development in diverse cultures.

Methods: The sample included 194 self-identified AI participants to view cultural and comparison stimuli across three media types (i.e., audio, video, and pictures). Participants rated each stimulus for arousal, valence, identity relevance, and cultural typicality.

Results: Findings showed cultural stimuli consistently evoked higher responses across media type and domain of reactivity than comparison stimuli (ps < .001, ds = 0.30-2.37). Identity ratings for cultural stimuli across all media types were directly correlated with self-report assessments of AI spirituality and enculturation (rs = 0.22-0.40, ps < .002) as well as inversely associated with acculturation (rs = -0.35 to -0.49, ps < .001).

Conclusions: These findings underline the potential of the devised stimulus set to effectively measure cultural connection in a heterogeneous AI population and offer a framework for broad cross-cultural application in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

美国印第安人多媒体刺激(AIMS)文化认同反应测量方法的开发与验证。
目的:传统文化联系是美洲印第安人健康研究中一个既定的保护因素。传统文化联系的测量主要以调查为基础,限制了描述潜在过程的能力,这些过程对于推进基于文化的心理健康预防和干预工作可能很重要。本研究旨在建立并验证文化认同的刺激集,并为不同文化中的相似发展提供一个框架。方法:样本包括194名自我认定的人工智能参与者,他们通过三种媒体类型(即音频、视频和图片)查看文化和比较刺激。参与者根据唤醒、效价、身份相关性和文化典型性对每个刺激进行打分。结果:文化刺激在不同媒介类型和反应域的反应均高于比较刺激(ps < 0.001, ds = 0.30-2.37)。对所有媒体类型的文化刺激的认同评级与人工智能灵性和文化适应的自我报告评估直接相关(rs = 0.22-0.40, ps < 0.002),与文化适应呈负相关(rs = -0.35至-0.49,ps < 0.001)。结论:这些发现强调了设计的刺激集在有效测量异质人工智能群体中的文化联系方面的潜力,并为未来研究中广泛的跨文化应用提供了框架。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信