Assessing cognitive development in a diverse age child cohort using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children II: a correlational study among children of adolescent mothers in South Africa.
{"title":"Assessing cognitive development in a diverse age child cohort using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children II: a correlational study among children of adolescent mothers in South Africa.","authors":"Katherine Morse, Claire Tatham, Bongiwe Saliwe, Bulelani Gwampi, Lulama Sidloyi, Lorraine Sherr, Elona Toska","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2025.2514487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are significant challenges for research on child cognitive development in resource-scarce environments including the need for contextually appropriate assessments that accommodate diverse age cohorts or span multiple years or rounds of data collection in longitudinal studies. In such cases, combining two cognitive assessments may be necessary to maximize age and assessment item coverage. The Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) is developed for children aged 2-60 months, while the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-II) is administered to children aged 3-18 years. Understanding the relationship between these scales is essential for drawing valid conclusions across age cohorts and study periods where children may age out of the MSEL. This correlational study examines the relationship between MSEL subscales and KABC-II subtests in a sample of 59 children aged 4-5 years in the Eastern Cape, South Africa using data collected in March-June 2024. Intra-class correlations and paired t-tests demonstrate agreement between the two assessments indicating that the selected subtests are measuring similar underlying constructs. In post-hoc factor analysis the combined subscales had an alpha of 0.86 demonstrating strong agreement between the MSEL and KABC-II. These findings support the comparability of outcomes across different cognitive assessments, enabling researchers to identify risk and resilience pathways for children in low- and middle-income settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2025.2514487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are significant challenges for research on child cognitive development in resource-scarce environments including the need for contextually appropriate assessments that accommodate diverse age cohorts or span multiple years or rounds of data collection in longitudinal studies. In such cases, combining two cognitive assessments may be necessary to maximize age and assessment item coverage. The Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) is developed for children aged 2-60 months, while the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-II) is administered to children aged 3-18 years. Understanding the relationship between these scales is essential for drawing valid conclusions across age cohorts and study periods where children may age out of the MSEL. This correlational study examines the relationship between MSEL subscales and KABC-II subtests in a sample of 59 children aged 4-5 years in the Eastern Cape, South Africa using data collected in March-June 2024. Intra-class correlations and paired t-tests demonstrate agreement between the two assessments indicating that the selected subtests are measuring similar underlying constructs. In post-hoc factor analysis the combined subscales had an alpha of 0.86 demonstrating strong agreement between the MSEL and KABC-II. These findings support the comparability of outcomes across different cognitive assessments, enabling researchers to identify risk and resilience pathways for children in low- and middle-income settings.
期刊介绍:
The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to:
publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents,
publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and
promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology.
The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged.
Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.