Beyond Borders: A Typological Approach to Understand Sustainability Education Governance

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yulan Chen, Sienna Yun Chen, Hongfu Yuan, Hui Liu
{"title":"Beyond Borders: A Typological Approach to Understand Sustainability Education Governance","authors":"Yulan Chen,&nbsp;Sienna Yun Chen,&nbsp;Hongfu Yuan,&nbsp;Hui Liu","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Sustainability education governance plays a vital role in advancing global environmental and social goals, yet its institutional forms vary widely across countries and regions. While international frameworks such as SDG 4.7 and UNESCO's Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) provide broad objectives, the ways in which sustainability education is governed—from policy design to stakeholder engagement—remain fragmented and under-theorised. This paper develops a three-dimensional typological framework to classify and analyse governance configurations in sustainability education, based on (1) the degree of policy centralisation, (2) the level of stakeholder inclusion and (3) the dominant regulatory-market orientation. Through this framework, we identify recurring governance patterns—such as state-centric regulation, participatory co-governance and hybrid public-private models—each of which entails distinct strengths and trade-offs in terms of coherence, adaptability and equity. Drawing on illustrative cases, we demonstrate how these configurations shape the implementation, funding and legitimacy of sustainability education. The typology serves as both a diagnostic tool for assessing existing systems and a heuristic for designing governance arrangements that are context-sensitive, inclusive and resilient. Rather than advocating a single best model, we argue for flexible and adaptive governance frameworks that acknowledge the dynamic, contested nature of sustainability education and respond to evolving socio-environmental challenges. We conclude by identifying future research directions, particularly the need to examine governance transitions and cross-sectoral coordination over time.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainability education governance plays a vital role in advancing global environmental and social goals, yet its institutional forms vary widely across countries and regions. While international frameworks such as SDG 4.7 and UNESCO's Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) provide broad objectives, the ways in which sustainability education is governed—from policy design to stakeholder engagement—remain fragmented and under-theorised. This paper develops a three-dimensional typological framework to classify and analyse governance configurations in sustainability education, based on (1) the degree of policy centralisation, (2) the level of stakeholder inclusion and (3) the dominant regulatory-market orientation. Through this framework, we identify recurring governance patterns—such as state-centric regulation, participatory co-governance and hybrid public-private models—each of which entails distinct strengths and trade-offs in terms of coherence, adaptability and equity. Drawing on illustrative cases, we demonstrate how these configurations shape the implementation, funding and legitimacy of sustainability education. The typology serves as both a diagnostic tool for assessing existing systems and a heuristic for designing governance arrangements that are context-sensitive, inclusive and resilient. Rather than advocating a single best model, we argue for flexible and adaptive governance frameworks that acknowledge the dynamic, contested nature of sustainability education and respond to evolving socio-environmental challenges. We conclude by identifying future research directions, particularly the need to examine governance transitions and cross-sectoral coordination over time.

超越国界:理解可持续教育治理的类型学方法
可持续教育治理在推进全球环境和社会目标方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但其制度形式因国家和地区而异。虽然可持续发展目标4.7和联合国教科文组织的可持续发展教育等国际框架提供了广泛的目标,但从政策设计到利益相关者参与,可持续发展教育的管理方式仍然是支离破碎和缺乏理论的。本文基于(1)政策集中化程度、(2)利益相关者包容水平和(3)主导的监管市场导向,构建了一个三维类型框架,对可持续发展教育中的治理配置进行分类和分析。通过这一框架,我们确定了反复出现的治理模式,如以国家为中心的监管、参与式共同治理和公私混合模式,每一种模式在一致性、适应性和公平性方面都具有独特的优势和权衡。通过举例说明,我们展示了这些配置如何影响可持续发展教育的实施、资助和合法性。该类型学既是评估现有系统的诊断工具,也是设计对环境敏感、包容和有弹性的治理安排的启发式方法。我们不提倡单一的最佳模式,而是主张灵活和适应性的治理框架,承认可持续发展教育的动态性和竞争性,并应对不断变化的社会环境挑战。最后,我们确定了未来的研究方向,特别是需要随着时间的推移检查治理过渡和跨部门协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信