The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cong Ren , Chengfeng Wang , Ren Lin , Jianbo Bu , Junjie Yan , Mengting Wu
{"title":"The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Cong Ren ,&nbsp;Chengfeng Wang ,&nbsp;Ren Lin ,&nbsp;Jianbo Bu ,&nbsp;Junjie Yan ,&nbsp;Mengting Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting </span>oral squamous cell carcinoma<span> (OSCC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, </span>Scopus, Web of Science, and other databases for studies published from January 2000 to November 2023. Studies that evaluated AI for OSCC diagnosis with sufficient data to calculate diagnostic accuracy were included. The methodological quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. The primary outcomes were pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A bivariate random-effects model was used for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-four studies comprising 18,574 specimens were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.90–0.98), and the pooled specificity was 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.91–0.98). The pooled PLR was 2.60 (95 % CI: 1.91–3.28), and the NLR was 0.10 (95 % CI: 0.07–0.17), with a DOR of 26.0 (95 % CI: 12.1–55.9). Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I² = 97.5 % for sensitivity and I² = 97.8 % for specificity). Deep learning algorithms demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional machine learning methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AI demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for OSCC detection, suggesting its potential value as an adjunctive diagnostic tool in clinical practice. However, high heterogeneity among studies indicates the need for standardized methodologies and external validation before widespread implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 5","pages":"Article 102429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525002150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and other databases for studies published from January 2000 to November 2023. Studies that evaluated AI for OSCC diagnosis with sufficient data to calculate diagnostic accuracy were included. The methodological quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. The primary outcomes were pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A bivariate random-effects model was used for analysis.

Results

Twenty-four studies comprising 18,574 specimens were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.90–0.98), and the pooled specificity was 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.91–0.98). The pooled PLR was 2.60 (95 % CI: 1.91–3.28), and the NLR was 0.10 (95 % CI: 0.07–0.17), with a DOR of 26.0 (95 % CI: 12.1–55.9). Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I² = 97.5 % for sensitivity and I² = 97.8 % for specificity). Deep learning algorithms demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional machine learning methods.

Conclusion

AI demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for OSCC detection, suggesting its potential value as an adjunctive diagnostic tool in clinical practice. However, high heterogeneity among studies indicates the need for standardized methodologies and external validation before widespread implementation.
人工智能在口腔鳞状细胞癌中的诊断价值:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:通过系统综述和荟萃分析,评价人工智能(AI)在口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)诊断中的应用价值。方法:综合检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science等数据库2000年1月至2023年11月发表的研究。纳入了评估AI用于OSCC诊断的研究,这些研究有足够的数据来计算诊断准确性。采用QUADAS-2评估方法学质量。主要结局包括敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断优势比(DOR)。采用双变量随机效应模型进行分析。结果:共纳入24项研究,共18574例标本。合并敏感性为0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98),合并特异性为0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98)。合并PLR为2.60 (95% CI: 1.91-3.28), NLR为0.10 (95% CI: 0.07-0.17), DOR为26.0 (95% CI: 12.1-55.9)。各研究间观察到显著的异质性(I² = 敏感性97.5%,I² = 特异性97.8%)。与传统的机器学习方法相比,深度学习算法表现出了优越的性能。结论:人工智能对OSCC检测具有较高的诊断准确率,具有作为临床辅助诊断工具的潜在价值。然而,研究之间的高度异质性表明,在广泛实施之前需要标准化的方法和外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信