Explaining Performance on Interval and Ratio Schedules with a Molar View of Behavior.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40614-025-00455-3
William M Baum
{"title":"Explaining Performance on Interval and Ratio Schedules with a Molar View of Behavior.","authors":"William M Baum","doi":"10.1007/s40614-025-00455-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some of the most basic phenomena in behavior analysis are the differences between performance on interval and ratio schedules. They have long been known and long puzzled over. Previous attempts to explain the performances have foundered either because they lacked a mechanism or because they adopted a molecular view of behavior based on discrete responses and contiguity. The molar view of behavior offers the sought-for explanation of differences in activity rate and the inability of ratio schedules to maintain activity at low food rates. The present account relies on induction by phylogenetically important events (PIE) according to power functions, molar feedback functions, and the framework of matching theory. A model described by a feedback system with all parameters the same predicts the relations between activity rate and PIE rate. The difference in overall activity rate arises from a difference in units of activities selected by ratio and interval schedules. The results demonstrate the greater explanatory power of the molar view of behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"48 2","pages":"173-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-025-00455-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some of the most basic phenomena in behavior analysis are the differences between performance on interval and ratio schedules. They have long been known and long puzzled over. Previous attempts to explain the performances have foundered either because they lacked a mechanism or because they adopted a molecular view of behavior based on discrete responses and contiguity. The molar view of behavior offers the sought-for explanation of differences in activity rate and the inability of ratio schedules to maintain activity at low food rates. The present account relies on induction by phylogenetically important events (PIE) according to power functions, molar feedback functions, and the framework of matching theory. A model described by a feedback system with all parameters the same predicts the relations between activity rate and PIE rate. The difference in overall activity rate arises from a difference in units of activities selected by ratio and interval schedules. The results demonstrate the greater explanatory power of the molar view of behavior.

用摩尔行为观解释间隔和比率计划上的表现。
行为分析中一些最基本的现象是间隔和比率计划的性能差异。长期以来,它们一直为人所知,也一直困惑不解。之前解释这些行为的尝试都失败了,要么是因为他们缺乏一种机制,要么是因为他们采用了基于离散反应和邻近的分子观点。行为的摩尔观为活动率的差异和比例表在低食物摄取量下维持活动的无能提供了寻求的解释。目前的描述依赖于根据幂函数、摩尔反馈函数和匹配理论框架的系统发育重要事件(PIE)的归纳。一个由所有参数相同的反馈系统描述的模型预测了活动率和PIE率之间的关系。总体活动率的差异源于按比率和间隔计划选择的活动单位的差异。结果表明,摩尔行为观具有更强的解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Perspectives on Behavior Science PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Behavior Science is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International. It is published quarterly, and in addition to its articles on theoretical, experimental, and applied topics in behavior analysis, this journal also includes literature reviews, re-interpretations of published data, and articles on behaviorism as a philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信