It's not just what you do, but the way you do it: network meta-analysis of the effects of different exercise modalities on the executive function of children and adolescents.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hua Li, Li Li
{"title":"It's not just what you do, but the way you do it: network meta-analysis of the effects of different exercise modalities on the executive function of children and adolescents.","authors":"Hua Li, Li Li","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2025.2517161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is recommended that regular exercise be used to improve the executive function of children and adolescents, but the most effective type of exercise remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of different exercise types on the executive function of children and adolescents and rank them. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on \"exercise interventions on the executive function of children and adolescents\" were searched in multiple databases up to December 31, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, evaluated methodological quality, and performed statistical analysis using Stata 17.0. Forty-three trials with 6944 participants were included. Net Meta-analysis showed that single aerobic exercise, cognitive+exercise, and ball games significantly improved inhibitory control compared to controls. Ball games were superior to combined exercises. Cognitive+exercise improved working memory, while ball games enhanced cognitive flexibility. SUCRA probability ranking indicated that ball games had the most significant effects on inhibitory control (SUCRA = 97.4), working memory (SUCRA = 77.0), and cognitive flexibility (SUCRA = 93.6). Ball games, single aerobic exercise, and cognitive+exercise significantly improved children's executive function. Ball games were the most effective intervention for inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2025.2517161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is recommended that regular exercise be used to improve the executive function of children and adolescents, but the most effective type of exercise remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of different exercise types on the executive function of children and adolescents and rank them. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on "exercise interventions on the executive function of children and adolescents" were searched in multiple databases up to December 31, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, evaluated methodological quality, and performed statistical analysis using Stata 17.0. Forty-three trials with 6944 participants were included. Net Meta-analysis showed that single aerobic exercise, cognitive+exercise, and ball games significantly improved inhibitory control compared to controls. Ball games were superior to combined exercises. Cognitive+exercise improved working memory, while ball games enhanced cognitive flexibility. SUCRA probability ranking indicated that ball games had the most significant effects on inhibitory control (SUCRA = 97.4), working memory (SUCRA = 77.0), and cognitive flexibility (SUCRA = 93.6). Ball games, single aerobic exercise, and cognitive+exercise significantly improved children's executive function. Ball games were the most effective intervention for inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility.

不仅仅是你做了什么,还有你做的方式:不同运动方式对儿童和青少年执行功能影响的网络荟萃分析。
人们建议通过定期锻炼来改善儿童和青少年的执行功能,但最有效的锻炼方式尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较不同运动类型对儿童和青少年执行功能的影响,并对其进行排序。截至2024年12月31日,在多个数据库中检索了“运动干预对儿童和青少年执行功能的影响”的随机对照试验(RCTs)。两位研究者独立筛选文献,提取数据,评估方法学质量,并使用Stata 17.0进行统计分析。共纳入43项试验,6944名受试者。Net meta分析显示,与对照组相比,单一有氧运动、认知+运动和球类运动显著改善了抑制控制。球类运动优于综合运动。认知+运动提高了工作记忆,而球类运动提高了认知灵活性。结果表明,球类运动对抑制控制(SUCRA = 97.4)、工作记忆(SUCRA = 77.0)和认知灵活性(SUCRA = 93.6)的影响最为显著。球类运动、单项有氧运动和认知+运动显著提高儿童执行功能。球类运动是对抑制控制、工作记忆和认知灵活性最有效的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信