‘Mind the Gap’—The impact of discrepancies between Google Maps API and reported travel data in the Global South

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Faza Fawzan Bastarianto , Thomas O. Hancock , Anugrah Ilahi , Ed Manley , Charisma Farheen Choudhury
{"title":"‘Mind the Gap’—The impact of discrepancies between Google Maps API and reported travel data in the Global South","authors":"Faza Fawzan Bastarianto ,&nbsp;Thomas O. Hancock ,&nbsp;Anugrah Ilahi ,&nbsp;Ed Manley ,&nbsp;Charisma Farheen Choudhury","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past decade, online navigation services have been adopted increasingly as a source of ‘ground truth’ in estimating choice alternatives during travel behaviour. These services, including Google Maps, Bing Map, and Waze, which are designed to provide real time traffic information and navigation guidance to the users, are believed to offer comprehensive and precise information regarding travel attributes. Nevertheless, discrepancies between the travel attributes collected from those services and the travel data that is reported by the travellers may introduce a systematic bias into travel behaviour analysis and modelling. This paper attempts to explore this challenge by investigating the discrepancy between the reported travel times and costs and the corresponding values derived from the Google Maps API. The comparison is conducted in the context of a developing country, through the use of travel diary survey data from Greater Jakarta, where there is a greater variety of transport modes and individuals may have varying capacities to gauge travel attributes due to the unpredictability of traffic conditions. Results show that even minor adjustments to which observations are included and which specific attribute treatments are used can completely change values of travel time savings (VTTS) estimates. Further, the characteristics of the observations excluded in the process of pre-processing are investigated to provide insight into preventing loss of data in future mobility surveys. Recommendations to address both of these issues are discussed along with policy implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25001452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, online navigation services have been adopted increasingly as a source of ‘ground truth’ in estimating choice alternatives during travel behaviour. These services, including Google Maps, Bing Map, and Waze, which are designed to provide real time traffic information and navigation guidance to the users, are believed to offer comprehensive and precise information regarding travel attributes. Nevertheless, discrepancies between the travel attributes collected from those services and the travel data that is reported by the travellers may introduce a systematic bias into travel behaviour analysis and modelling. This paper attempts to explore this challenge by investigating the discrepancy between the reported travel times and costs and the corresponding values derived from the Google Maps API. The comparison is conducted in the context of a developing country, through the use of travel diary survey data from Greater Jakarta, where there is a greater variety of transport modes and individuals may have varying capacities to gauge travel attributes due to the unpredictability of traffic conditions. Results show that even minor adjustments to which observations are included and which specific attribute treatments are used can completely change values of travel time savings (VTTS) estimates. Further, the characteristics of the observations excluded in the process of pre-processing are investigated to provide insight into preventing loss of data in future mobility surveys. Recommendations to address both of these issues are discussed along with policy implications.
“注意差距”——谷歌地图API与南半球报告的旅游数据之间差异的影响
在过去的十年中,在线导航服务已经越来越多地被采用为在旅行行为中估计选择选项的“基础事实”来源。这些服务,包括谷歌地图、必应地图和Waze,旨在为用户提供实时交通信息和导航指导,被认为可以提供关于旅行属性的全面和精确的信息。然而,从这些服务中收集到的旅行属性与旅行者报告的旅行数据之间的差异可能会给旅行行为分析和建模带来系统性偏差。本文试图通过调查报告的旅行时间和成本与从谷歌Maps API获得的相应值之间的差异来探索这一挑战。比较是在一个发展中国家的背景下进行的,通过使用大雅加达的旅行日记调查数据,那里的交通方式更多样化,由于交通状况的不可预测性,个人衡量旅行属性的能力可能不同。结果表明,即使是对观测值的微小调整和特定属性处理的使用,也可以完全改变旅行时间节省(VTTS)估计值。此外,研究了在预处理过程中排除的观测值的特征,以便为防止未来流动性调查中的数据丢失提供见解。讨论了解决这两个问题的建议以及政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信