Impact of enhanced pain knowledge on core outcomes in fibromyalgia patients with high self-reported pain education needs: a target trial emulation using the DANFIB registry.
Kirstine Amris, Robin Christensen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Pernille Hurup Duhn, Marius Henriksen
{"title":"Impact of enhanced pain knowledge on core outcomes in fibromyalgia patients with high self-reported pain education needs: a target trial emulation using the DANFIB registry.","authors":"Kirstine Amris, Robin Christensen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Pernille Hurup Duhn, Marius Henriksen","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Relationships between patient education and long-term clinical outcomes are complex. This study used real-world data to evaluate the impact of improved pain knowledge on clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected registry-based observational data were analysed to emulate a randomised clinical trial. Study participants were diagnosed with fibromyalgia, had a high need to learn about pain (Numeric Rating Scale >7), had attended a 2-day therapeutic educational programme and re-rated their learning needs after the programme. A good educational outcome was defined as a re-rating score <5, while a poor outcome was ≥5. The primary endpoint at 9 months was the overall impact of fibromyalgia, measured by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) impact subscale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The eligible cohort comprised 450 participants. The intention-to-treat from population included 121 participants (26.9%) with a good educational outcome and 329 participants (73.1%) with a poor educational outcome (comparator group). Missing outcome data were handled implicitly by the repeated measures linear mixed models, assuming data are missing at random.At the 9-month endpoint, the fully adjusted FIQR impact subscale score was lower in the good educational outcome group (8.0 (95% CI 7.3 to 8.7)) compared with the poor educational outcome group (9.6 (95% CI 9.0 to 10.2)), indicating a better clinical outcome for those with a good educational outcome. The model-estimated between-group difference was -1.6 (95% CI -2.5 to -0.7; p=0.0006) FIQR impact subscale units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that achieving pain educational learning objectives leads to better clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia patients, supporting the integration of pain education into patient programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Relationships between patient education and long-term clinical outcomes are complex. This study used real-world data to evaluate the impact of improved pain knowledge on clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia patients.
Methods: Prospectively collected registry-based observational data were analysed to emulate a randomised clinical trial. Study participants were diagnosed with fibromyalgia, had a high need to learn about pain (Numeric Rating Scale >7), had attended a 2-day therapeutic educational programme and re-rated their learning needs after the programme. A good educational outcome was defined as a re-rating score <5, while a poor outcome was ≥5. The primary endpoint at 9 months was the overall impact of fibromyalgia, measured by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) impact subscale.
Results: The eligible cohort comprised 450 participants. The intention-to-treat from population included 121 participants (26.9%) with a good educational outcome and 329 participants (73.1%) with a poor educational outcome (comparator group). Missing outcome data were handled implicitly by the repeated measures linear mixed models, assuming data are missing at random.At the 9-month endpoint, the fully adjusted FIQR impact subscale score was lower in the good educational outcome group (8.0 (95% CI 7.3 to 8.7)) compared with the poor educational outcome group (9.6 (95% CI 9.0 to 10.2)), indicating a better clinical outcome for those with a good educational outcome. The model-estimated between-group difference was -1.6 (95% CI -2.5 to -0.7; p=0.0006) FIQR impact subscale units.
Conclusions: This study suggests that achieving pain educational learning objectives leads to better clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia patients, supporting the integration of pain education into patient programmes.
目的:患者教育与长期临床结果之间的关系是复杂的。本研究使用真实世界的数据来评估改善疼痛知识对纤维肌痛患者临床结果的影响。方法:对前瞻性收集的基于注册表的观察性数据进行分析,以模拟随机临床试验。研究参与者被诊断为纤维肌痛,对疼痛有很高的学习需求(数值评定量表bbb70),参加了为期两天的治疗性教育计划,并在计划结束后重新评估他们的学习需求。一个良好的教育成果被定义为一个重新评估得分。结果:符合条件的队列包括450名参与者。意向治疗人群包括121名教育结果良好的参与者(26.9%)和329名教育结果较差的参与者(73.1%)(比较组)。缺失的结果数据由重复测量线性混合模型隐式处理,假设数据是随机缺失的。在9个月的终点,良好教育结果组的完全调整FIQR影响亚量表得分(8.0 (95% CI 7.3至8.7))低于差教育结果组(9.6 (95% CI 9.0至10.2)),表明具有良好教育结果的患者具有更好的临床结果。模型估计的组间差异为-1.6 (95% CI为-2.5至-0.7;p=0.0006) FIQR影响子尺度单位。结论:本研究表明,实现疼痛教育学习目标可以为纤维肌痛患者带来更好的临床结果,支持将疼痛教育纳入患者计划。
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.