Advancing dairy farm simulations: A two-step approach for tailored lactation curve estimation and its systemic impacts.

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Y Gong, H Hu, K F Reed, V E Cabrera
{"title":"Advancing dairy farm simulations: A two-step approach for tailored lactation curve estimation and its systemic impacts.","authors":"Y Gong, H Hu, K F Reed, V E Cabrera","doi":"10.3168/jds.2025-26334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lactation curve models are a foundational component of dairy farm simulation models because they support prediction of individual animal milk production over time. For farm simulation models to be applicable as decision-support tools, the predicted baseline milk production should match farm reported production as accurately as possible. However, individual animal lactation curve parameters are not easily accessible farm data. This study introduces a straightforward and effective calibration method for determining the parameters of Wood's lactation curve, leveraging a previously published database of parameters and 3 additional data inputs readily available on farms: annual herd milk production (AHMP), number of milking cows, and herd parity composition. Our method involves (1) adjusting curve parameters based on previously reported national estimates and farm contextual metadata (i.e., temporal, geographic, and management factors) and (2) further optimizing the scale parameter for each parity to match the 305-d milk yield derived from observed AHMP, number of milking cows, and herd parity composition. The Ruminant Farm Systems (RuFaS) model, a comprehensive dairy farm simulation platform, was employed to evaluate this method on 10 commercial Holstein dairy farms in New York (n = 3), Texas (n = 3), and Wisconsin (n = 4). By using lactation curve parameters estimated by this calibration method, we achieved greater accuracy in estimating AHMP with RuFaS for these case study farms, reducing the root mean square percentage error from 40.6% to 2.22%. To evaluate the downstream effects of lactation curve estimation methods within a farm systems context, we used the RuFaS Animal Module to simulate key performance and environmental metrics, including dry matter intake, enteric methane production, and manure excretion. We calculated gross feed efficiency and associated feed and manure emissions using emission factors derived from established literature. The results underscore the critical role of lactation curve modeling in dairy farm system simulation models and its substantial effects on environmental footprint predictions. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of our lactation curve parameter calibration method. With this method, farm system simulation models such as RuFaS can greatly increase their reliability in generating farm-specific predictions without requiring extensive farm data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-26334","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lactation curve models are a foundational component of dairy farm simulation models because they support prediction of individual animal milk production over time. For farm simulation models to be applicable as decision-support tools, the predicted baseline milk production should match farm reported production as accurately as possible. However, individual animal lactation curve parameters are not easily accessible farm data. This study introduces a straightforward and effective calibration method for determining the parameters of Wood's lactation curve, leveraging a previously published database of parameters and 3 additional data inputs readily available on farms: annual herd milk production (AHMP), number of milking cows, and herd parity composition. Our method involves (1) adjusting curve parameters based on previously reported national estimates and farm contextual metadata (i.e., temporal, geographic, and management factors) and (2) further optimizing the scale parameter for each parity to match the 305-d milk yield derived from observed AHMP, number of milking cows, and herd parity composition. The Ruminant Farm Systems (RuFaS) model, a comprehensive dairy farm simulation platform, was employed to evaluate this method on 10 commercial Holstein dairy farms in New York (n = 3), Texas (n = 3), and Wisconsin (n = 4). By using lactation curve parameters estimated by this calibration method, we achieved greater accuracy in estimating AHMP with RuFaS for these case study farms, reducing the root mean square percentage error from 40.6% to 2.22%. To evaluate the downstream effects of lactation curve estimation methods within a farm systems context, we used the RuFaS Animal Module to simulate key performance and environmental metrics, including dry matter intake, enteric methane production, and manure excretion. We calculated gross feed efficiency and associated feed and manure emissions using emission factors derived from established literature. The results underscore the critical role of lactation curve modeling in dairy farm system simulation models and its substantial effects on environmental footprint predictions. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of our lactation curve parameter calibration method. With this method, farm system simulation models such as RuFaS can greatly increase their reliability in generating farm-specific predictions without requiring extensive farm data collection.

推进奶牛场模拟:定制泌乳曲线估计及其系统影响的两步方法。
泌乳曲线模型是奶牛场模拟模型的基础组成部分,因为它们支持个体动物随时间的产奶量预测。为了使农场模拟模型适用于决策支持工具,预测的基线牛奶产量应尽可能准确地与农场报告的产量相匹配。然而,个体动物的泌乳曲线参数不容易获得农场数据。本研究介绍了一种简单有效的校准方法,用于确定Wood泌乳曲线的参数,该方法利用了先前发表的参数数据库和3个农场现成的额外数据输入:年牛群产奶量(AHMP)、奶牛数量和畜群胎次组成。我们的方法包括:(1)根据先前报道的国家估计和农场背景元数据(即时间、地理和管理因素)调整曲线参数;(2)进一步优化每个胎次的尺度参数,以匹配由观察到的AHMP、挤奶奶牛数量和畜群胎次组成得出的305天产奶量。采用综合奶牛场模拟平台反刍动物农场系统(RuFaS)模型,在纽约(n = 3)、德克萨斯州(n = 3)和威斯康星州(n = 4)的10个荷斯坦商业奶牛场对该方法进行了评估。通过使用该校准方法估计的哺乳曲线参数,我们在这些案例研究农场的rufa估计AHMP时获得了更高的准确性,将均方根百分比误差从40.6%降低到2.22%。为了在农场系统背景下评估泌乳曲线估计方法的下游影响,我们使用RuFaS动物模块模拟关键性能和环境指标,包括干物质摄入量、肠道甲烷产量和粪便排泄。我们计算了总饲料效率和相关的饲料和粪肥排放量,使用的排放因子来自已建立的文献。研究结果强调了哺乳曲线建模在奶牛场系统模拟模型中的关键作用及其对环境足迹预测的实质性影响。综上所述,本研究验证了本方法的有效性。使用这种方法,农场系统模拟模型(如rufa)可以大大提高其在生成特定农场预测时的可靠性,而无需大量收集农场数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信