Listening, Reading, or Both? Rethinking the Comprehension Benefits of Reading‐While‐Listening

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bronson Hui, Aline Godfroid
{"title":"Listening, Reading, or Both? Rethinking the Comprehension Benefits of Reading‐While‐Listening","authors":"Bronson Hui, Aline Godfroid","doi":"10.1111/lang.12721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rising popularity of audiobooks in language learning has highlighted the need to understand their potential benefits in enhancing comprehension and the mechanisms driving these effects. In this registered report, we explored the hypothesis that reading‐while‐listening can enhance lower‐level decoding skills, in turn freeing up cognitive resources to support comprehension. In a within‐participant design, eighty‐six intermediate‐to‐advanced Chinese learners of English read, read and listened, and listened to different excerpts of a novel. Contrary to our preregistered hypotheses, participants comprehended the text less well when reading‐while‐listening than when reading it silently. Both reading conditions yielded better comprehension than listening‐only. Individual differences in segmentation skills and orthographic decoding supported comprehension but did not interact with the input condition in the way that theory would predict. These results confirm the importance of orthographic decoding and speech segmentation for comprehension, but they also point to gaps in theoretical understanding of reading‐while‐listening's presumed pedagogical advantages for comprehension.","PeriodicalId":51371,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising popularity of audiobooks in language learning has highlighted the need to understand their potential benefits in enhancing comprehension and the mechanisms driving these effects. In this registered report, we explored the hypothesis that reading‐while‐listening can enhance lower‐level decoding skills, in turn freeing up cognitive resources to support comprehension. In a within‐participant design, eighty‐six intermediate‐to‐advanced Chinese learners of English read, read and listened, and listened to different excerpts of a novel. Contrary to our preregistered hypotheses, participants comprehended the text less well when reading‐while‐listening than when reading it silently. Both reading conditions yielded better comprehension than listening‐only. Individual differences in segmentation skills and orthographic decoding supported comprehension but did not interact with the input condition in the way that theory would predict. These results confirm the importance of orthographic decoding and speech segmentation for comprehension, but they also point to gaps in theoretical understanding of reading‐while‐listening's presumed pedagogical advantages for comprehension.
听,读,还是两者都有?重新思考边听边读的理解益处
随着有声读物在语言学习中的日益普及,我们有必要了解有声读物在提高理解能力方面的潜在好处,以及推动这些影响的机制。在这篇注册报告中,我们探讨了边听边读可以提高低水平解码技能的假设,从而释放认知资源来支持理解。在参与者内部设计中,86名中级到高级的中国英语学习者阅读,阅读和听,并听一本小说的不同摘录。与我们预先注册的假设相反,参与者在边听边读时对文本的理解不如默读时好。两种阅读条件都比单纯的听力条件产生更好的理解能力。切分技能和正字法解码的个体差异支持理解,但与理论预测的输入条件没有相互作用。这些结果证实了正字法解码和语音切分对理解的重要性,但它们也指出了在理论理解上的差距,即阅读-同时-听对理解的假定教学优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Learning
Language Learning Multiple-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Language Learning is a scientific journal dedicated to the understanding of language learning broadly defined. It publishes research articles that systematically apply methods of inquiry from disciplines including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science, educational inquiry, neuroscience, ethnography, sociolinguistics, sociology, and anthropology. It is concerned with fundamental theoretical issues in language learning such as child, second, and foreign language acquisition, language education, bilingualism, literacy, language representation in mind and brain, culture, cognition, pragmatics, and intergroup relations. A subscription includes one or two annual supplements, alternating among a volume from the Language Learning Cognitive Neuroscience Series, the Currents in Language Learning Series or the Language Learning Special Issue Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信