A comparative analysis of façades with cool coatings and living green walls in hot-dry climates

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Sahar Khabir , Roza Vakilinezhad , Ozgur Gocer
{"title":"A comparative analysis of façades with cool coatings and living green walls in hot-dry climates","authors":"Sahar Khabir ,&nbsp;Roza Vakilinezhad ,&nbsp;Ozgur Gocer","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As cities face climate change and urbanization challenges, cool façade systems like advanced coating materials and living green walls (LGWs) have become popular because of their potential to improve urban sustainability and the thermal performance of existing buildings. The cool facade systems aim to mitigate the urban heat island effect by reducing heat absorption, enhancing occupant thermal comfort, and decreasing building energy consumption by lowering interior surface temperatures. This study compares advanced cool coatings, high-retroreflective materials (HRR), and LGWs regarding thermal performance, energy savings, and carbon emissions for a typical residential building in a hot-dry climate. Scenario-based simulation and optimization methods are combined with comparative analysis to evaluate building performance. Thirty-two façade design options were determined, defining four scenarios (two options with cool coatings and two with LGWs on a façade with brick and stone) for simulation using DesignBuilder software and a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) optimization tool. The results identified the most optimal façade design option for each scenario. The findings revealed that applying advanced materials lowers the exterior surface temperatures up to 2.5 and 2.15 °C in HRR and LGW facades, respectively. The advanced coating achieved the best performance, reducing total thermal loads by 12.8 %, while the maximum thermal load reduction would be 9.4 % in LGW scenarios. However, considering carbon emissions, the reduction equals 19 and 11.28 % in LGW and advanced coating scenarios, respectively. Moreover, the results showed that LGW options with an air gap layer have better thermal and energy performance than those without an air gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 116008"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825007388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As cities face climate change and urbanization challenges, cool façade systems like advanced coating materials and living green walls (LGWs) have become popular because of their potential to improve urban sustainability and the thermal performance of existing buildings. The cool facade systems aim to mitigate the urban heat island effect by reducing heat absorption, enhancing occupant thermal comfort, and decreasing building energy consumption by lowering interior surface temperatures. This study compares advanced cool coatings, high-retroreflective materials (HRR), and LGWs regarding thermal performance, energy savings, and carbon emissions for a typical residential building in a hot-dry climate. Scenario-based simulation and optimization methods are combined with comparative analysis to evaluate building performance. Thirty-two façade design options were determined, defining four scenarios (two options with cool coatings and two with LGWs on a façade with brick and stone) for simulation using DesignBuilder software and a genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) optimization tool. The results identified the most optimal façade design option for each scenario. The findings revealed that applying advanced materials lowers the exterior surface temperatures up to 2.5 and 2.15 °C in HRR and LGW facades, respectively. The advanced coating achieved the best performance, reducing total thermal loads by 12.8 %, while the maximum thermal load reduction would be 9.4 % in LGW scenarios. However, considering carbon emissions, the reduction equals 19 and 11.28 % in LGW and advanced coating scenarios, respectively. Moreover, the results showed that LGW options with an air gap layer have better thermal and energy performance than those without an air gap.
干热气候条件下冷涂层住宅与活绿墙住宅的比较分析
随着城市面临气候变化和城市化的挑战,像先进的涂层材料和生活绿色墙(lgw)这样的冷幕墙系统已经变得流行,因为它们有可能提高城市的可持续性和现有建筑的热性能。冷立面系统旨在通过减少热量吸收,增强居住者的热舒适性,并通过降低室内表面温度来减少建筑能耗,从而缓解城市热岛效应。本研究比较了在干热气候下的典型住宅建筑中先进的冷涂层、高反射材料(HRR)和低反射材料的热性能、节能和碳排放。将基于场景的模拟和优化方法与对比分析相结合,对建筑性能进行评估。确定了32个立面设计方案,定义了四种方案(两种方案使用冷涂层,两种方案使用lgw在砖和石头的立面上),使用DesignBuilder软件和遗传算法(NSGA-II)优化工具进行模拟。结果确定了每个场景的最优外观设计选项。研究结果表明,采用先进材料可将HRR和LGW外墙的外表面温度分别降低2.5和2.15 °C。先进的涂层达到了最佳性能,降低了12.8% %的总热负荷,而在LGW情况下,最大热负荷降低了9.4% %。然而,考虑到碳排放,在LGW和先进涂层方案中分别减少了19%和11.28 %。此外,研究结果还表明,有气隙层的LGW材料比没有气隙层的LGW材料具有更好的热性能和能量性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信