Introducing the intruder paradox: "It's not the imposter syndrome, it's you don't want me in the field".

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kori A LaDonna, Lindsay Cowley, Emily Field, Shiphra Ginsburg, Christopher Watling, Rachael Pack
{"title":"Introducing the intruder paradox: \"It's not the imposter syndrome, it's you don't want me in the field\".","authors":"Kori A LaDonna, Lindsay Cowley, Emily Field, Shiphra Ginsburg, Christopher Watling, Rachael Pack","doi":"10.1111/medu.15741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Imposter phenomenon (IP) or syndrome is typically framed as a personal problem rooted in low self-esteem or anxiety that an individual must overcome to succeed. Critics argue that this framing overlooks external forces, such as discrimination, that engender feelings of inadequacy. Since women in medicine disproportionately experience both IP and workplace harms, our purpose was to examine the link between gender-based discrimination and IP from their point of view.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women training and practicing across Canada were invited to participate via Twitter/X. Forty consented (n = 13 Faculty Physicians; 27 Trainees). During semi-structured interviews, participants discussed their imposter experiences, including how discrimination influenced perceptions of their competence. Data were analysed using constructivist grounded theory, with constant comparative analysis employed across three coding stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The link between workplace discrimination and IP is complex. Some perceived no link whereas others described IP as a trauma response to repeated instances of gender-based harms. Most participants experienced discrimination, although subtle instances led some to question whether they were overreacting. Others suggested that perceptions of incompetence were externally imposed rather than internally generated. Some also wondered if they were being \"gaslighted\" or manipulated by others into questioning their competence. Although some participants endorsed experiencing IP, others pushed back, rejecting the imposter label altogether: \"it's not the imposter syndrome, it's you don't want me in the field.\" Based on participants' experiences, we developed a theoretical model called the Intruder Paradox (IPx) to nuance understanding about IP in medicine.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We define IPx as a form of gaslighting used against those who do not fit sociocultural norms. Although it may co-exist with IP, IPx appears to be a distinct, overlooked barrier to personal well-being and professional advancement in medicine. Addressing IP and IPx, and achieving equity, depends on acknowledging the complex sociocultural factors that can trigger imposter feelings and be weaponized against intruders.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15741","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Imposter phenomenon (IP) or syndrome is typically framed as a personal problem rooted in low self-esteem or anxiety that an individual must overcome to succeed. Critics argue that this framing overlooks external forces, such as discrimination, that engender feelings of inadequacy. Since women in medicine disproportionately experience both IP and workplace harms, our purpose was to examine the link between gender-based discrimination and IP from their point of view.

Methods: Women training and practicing across Canada were invited to participate via Twitter/X. Forty consented (n = 13 Faculty Physicians; 27 Trainees). During semi-structured interviews, participants discussed their imposter experiences, including how discrimination influenced perceptions of their competence. Data were analysed using constructivist grounded theory, with constant comparative analysis employed across three coding stages.

Results: The link between workplace discrimination and IP is complex. Some perceived no link whereas others described IP as a trauma response to repeated instances of gender-based harms. Most participants experienced discrimination, although subtle instances led some to question whether they were overreacting. Others suggested that perceptions of incompetence were externally imposed rather than internally generated. Some also wondered if they were being "gaslighted" or manipulated by others into questioning their competence. Although some participants endorsed experiencing IP, others pushed back, rejecting the imposter label altogether: "it's not the imposter syndrome, it's you don't want me in the field." Based on participants' experiences, we developed a theoretical model called the Intruder Paradox (IPx) to nuance understanding about IP in medicine.

Discussion: We define IPx as a form of gaslighting used against those who do not fit sociocultural norms. Although it may co-exist with IP, IPx appears to be a distinct, overlooked barrier to personal well-being and professional advancement in medicine. Addressing IP and IPx, and achieving equity, depends on acknowledging the complex sociocultural factors that can trigger imposter feelings and be weaponized against intruders.

引入入侵者悖论:“这不是冒名顶替综合症,而是你不想让我出外勤。”
简介:冒名顶替现象(IP)或综合症通常被认为是一种个人问题,其根源在于低自尊或焦虑,个人必须克服这种问题才能成功。批评人士认为,这种框架忽视了外部力量,比如歧视,这些因素会产生不称职的感觉。由于医学领域的女性在知识产权和工作场所受到的伤害不成比例,我们的目的是从她们的角度研究基于性别的歧视与知识产权之间的联系。方法:通过Twitter/X邀请加拿大各地的女性参加培训和练习。40名同意(n = 13名院系医师;27个学员)。在半结构化访谈中,参与者讨论了他们的冒名顶替经历,包括歧视如何影响对他们能力的看法。数据分析使用建构主义扎根理论,并在三个编码阶段采用持续的比较分析。结果:工作场所歧视与知识产权之间的联系是复杂的。一些人认为没有联系,而另一些人则将知识产权描述为对反复发生的基于性别的伤害的创伤反应。大多数参与者都经历过歧视,尽管一些微妙的例子让一些人质疑他们是否反应过度。其他人则认为,无能的观念是外部强加的,而不是内部产生的。一些人还怀疑,他们是否被“激怒”或被他人操纵,从而质疑自己的能力。尽管一些参与者支持体验IP,但其他人则反对,完全拒绝冒名顶替者的标签:“这不是冒名顶替综合症,而是你不想让我进入这个领域。”基于参与者的经验,我们开发了一个称为入侵者悖论(IPx)的理论模型,以细微差别理解医学中的知识产权。讨论:我们将IPx定义为一种针对那些不符合社会文化规范的人的煤气灯。虽然IPx可能与知识产权共存,但它似乎是阻碍个人福祉和医学专业进步的一个明显的、被忽视的障碍。解决IP和IPx问题,并实现公平,取决于承认复杂的社会文化因素,这些因素可能引发冒名者的感觉,并被用作对付入侵者的武器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信