Spouse and Child Caregivers' Experiences of Lucid Episodes in Dementia: A Mixed Methods Approach.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf036
Kyungmin Kim, Lauren R Bangerter, Yin Liu, Dawn M Finnie, Maria I Lapid, Joseph E Gaugler, Joan M Griffin
{"title":"Spouse and Child Caregivers' Experiences of Lucid Episodes in Dementia: A Mixed Methods Approach.","authors":"Kyungmin Kim, Lauren R Bangerter, Yin Liu, Dawn M Finnie, Maria I Lapid, Joseph E Gaugler, Joan M Griffin","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Lucid episodes (LEs) in people living with late-stage dementia have been reported anecdotally. However, how this seemingly unexpected phenomenon is experienced by family caregivers is less known. Focusing on the two most common groups of informal caregivers, spouses and adult children, this study examined variability in family caregivers' experiences with LEs-whether they exhibit differential appraisals of and responses to LEs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using a sample of former/bereaved and current family caregivers from UsAgainstAlzheimer's A-LIST, we conducted an online survey of spouse and child caregivers (<i>N</i> = 387). We conducted semistructured interviews among a subset of caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 22).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, child caregivers were more likely to witness a LE than spouse caregivers. Among former/bereaved caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 139), spouses were likely to report nonverbal communication during LEs, appraise LEs more negatively, and make changes in care decisions, such as end-of-life planning and financial decisions, compared to adult children. Among current caregivers who witnessed a LE (<i>n</i> = 80), spouses often reported no special circumstances preceding LEs, whereas children linked LEs to friend/family visits. No significant differences were found in positive and negative appraisals of LEs between current spouse and child caregivers. Content analysis of qualitative interviews revealed the contexts underlying these differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Differences between spouses and adult children in their experiences with LEs are related to their different caregiving contexts, including relationship history, living arrangements, expectations, motivations, and caregiving resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 6","pages":"igaf036"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Lucid episodes (LEs) in people living with late-stage dementia have been reported anecdotally. However, how this seemingly unexpected phenomenon is experienced by family caregivers is less known. Focusing on the two most common groups of informal caregivers, spouses and adult children, this study examined variability in family caregivers' experiences with LEs-whether they exhibit differential appraisals of and responses to LEs.

Research design and methods: Using a sample of former/bereaved and current family caregivers from UsAgainstAlzheimer's A-LIST, we conducted an online survey of spouse and child caregivers (N = 387). We conducted semistructured interviews among a subset of caregivers who witnessed a LE (n = 22).

Results: Overall, child caregivers were more likely to witness a LE than spouse caregivers. Among former/bereaved caregivers who witnessed a LE (n = 139), spouses were likely to report nonverbal communication during LEs, appraise LEs more negatively, and make changes in care decisions, such as end-of-life planning and financial decisions, compared to adult children. Among current caregivers who witnessed a LE (n = 80), spouses often reported no special circumstances preceding LEs, whereas children linked LEs to friend/family visits. No significant differences were found in positive and negative appraisals of LEs between current spouse and child caregivers. Content analysis of qualitative interviews revealed the contexts underlying these differences.

Discussion and implications: Differences between spouses and adult children in their experiences with LEs are related to their different caregiving contexts, including relationship history, living arrangements, expectations, motivations, and caregiving resources.

配偶和儿童照顾者对痴呆清醒发作的经历:一种混合方法。
背景和目的:在晚期痴呆患者中有清醒发作(LEs)的报道。然而,这种看似意想不到的现象是如何被家庭照顾者所经历的却鲜为人知。本研究聚焦于两种最常见的非正式照顾者群体,配偶和成年子女,研究了家庭照顾者对生活自理经历的可变性——他们是否对生活自理表现出不同的评价和反应。研究设计与方法:我们以usagainstalalzheimer 's a - list中曾经/失去和现在的家庭照顾者为样本,对配偶和儿童照顾者进行了在线调查(N = 387)。我们对目睹LE的护理人员子集进行了半结构化访谈(n = 22)。结果:总体而言,儿童照顾者比配偶照顾者更容易目睹LE。与成年子女相比,在经历过LE的前/失去亲人的照顾者中(n = 139),配偶可能在LE期间报告非语言沟通,更消极地评价LE,并在护理决策方面做出改变,如临终计划和财务决策。在目睹过LE的当前照顾者中(n = 80),配偶通常报告在LE之前没有特殊情况,而儿童则将LE与朋友/家人的拜访联系起来。在职配偶与儿童照顾者对生活品质的正面评价与负面评价无显著差异。定性访谈的内容分析揭示了这些差异背后的背景。讨论与启示:配偶和成年子女在经历LEs方面的差异与他们不同的照顾环境有关,包括关系历史、生活安排、期望、动机和照顾资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信