Quantifying outdoor heat stress potential due to city-wide installation of rooftop photovoltaic solar panels

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Samiran Khorat , Rupali Khatun , Debashish Das , Asfa Siddiqui , Ansar Khan , Nilabhra Mondal , Sk Mohammad Aziz , Prashant Anand , Quang Van Doan , Dev Niyogi , Mattheos Santamouris
{"title":"Quantifying outdoor heat stress potential due to city-wide installation of rooftop photovoltaic solar panels","authors":"Samiran Khorat ,&nbsp;Rupali Khatun ,&nbsp;Debashish Das ,&nbsp;Asfa Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Ansar Khan ,&nbsp;Nilabhra Mondal ,&nbsp;Sk Mohammad Aziz ,&nbsp;Prashant Anand ,&nbsp;Quang Van Doan ,&nbsp;Dev Niyogi ,&nbsp;Mattheos Santamouris","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban heat is becoming increasingly severe in densely populated regions, particularly in the tropical climates, where average summer temperatures frequently reach &gt; 34 °C [307.15 K]. As cities seek sustainable energy solutions, rooftop photovoltaic solar panels (RPVSPs) have gained popularity for their renewable energy potential. However, the microclimatic implications of RPVSPs on urban heat stress remain inadequately understood. This study addresses a critical study gap by being the first to systematically investigate RPVSP-induced heat stress taking the city scale analysis for Kolkata, India focusing on its effects on thermal comfort and the urban microclimate. By comparing buildings equipped with RPVSPs to those without, we analysed variations in key meteorological parameters and heat stress indicators, utilizing the universal thermal comfort index (UTCI) and heat index (HI) at city scale. The present study indicates that RPVSPs contribute to an increase in daytime ambient temperatures by approximately 1.6 °C and surface temperatures by about 3.4 °C, based on simulations incorporating improved surface and urban canopy parameters derived from the University of Texas–Global Building Heights for Urban Studies (UT-GLOBUS) dataset. These findings are consistent with our earlier study conducted without improved surface and urban canopy parameters, which reported that RPVSPs contributed to an increase in daytime ambient temperatures by approximately 1.5 °C and surface temperatures by around 3.2 °C. The results of this study further suggest that this increase in RPVSP-induced urban temperature can lead to a rise in extreme heat stress exposure, with 44.1 % of daytime hours classified as extreme heat stress (UTCI &gt; 46 °C) for buildings with RPVSPs, compared to 18.5 % for non-RPVSP buildings at city scale. However, these panels also yield a decrease in extreme heat hours at night from 23.4 % to 19.1 %, indicating potential improvements in nighttime thermal comfort. The analysis of cooling degree hours (CDH) showed a 9.71 % increase in maximum daytime CDH, indicating a rise in cooling demand from 200.5 h to 220.6 h in Kolkata city where all buildings were considered equipped with RPVSPs. Nevertheless, a decrease of 7.70 % in maximum nighttime CDH, dropping from 130 h to 120 h, highlights the panels’ capacity to reduce heat retention during cooler hours. Additionally, this study also quantifies the dual role of RPVSPs in mitigating and amplifying thermal stress during Kolkata’s heatwaves. While daytime air conditioning (AC) energy demand averages 25.86 Wm<sup>−2</sup>, RPVSPs generate 17.61 Wm<sup>−2</sup> covering 68.1 % of the cooling load. However, nighttime output drops to zero, despite a sustained demand of 19.4 Wm<sup>−2</sup>. Overall, RPVSPs meet only 48.1 % of daily AC energy demand, with just 20–25 % coverage in dense, high-rise areas but up to 80 % in low-density zones. This study distinctively elucidates the dual role of RPVSPs in urban thermal dynamics, revealing how they can both exacerbate daytime heat stress while enhancing nighttime comfort. The findings reveal the need for adaptive urban planning that effectively integrates renewable energy solutions with strategies to mitigate urban heat.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 115996"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825007261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban heat is becoming increasingly severe in densely populated regions, particularly in the tropical climates, where average summer temperatures frequently reach > 34 °C [307.15 K]. As cities seek sustainable energy solutions, rooftop photovoltaic solar panels (RPVSPs) have gained popularity for their renewable energy potential. However, the microclimatic implications of RPVSPs on urban heat stress remain inadequately understood. This study addresses a critical study gap by being the first to systematically investigate RPVSP-induced heat stress taking the city scale analysis for Kolkata, India focusing on its effects on thermal comfort and the urban microclimate. By comparing buildings equipped with RPVSPs to those without, we analysed variations in key meteorological parameters and heat stress indicators, utilizing the universal thermal comfort index (UTCI) and heat index (HI) at city scale. The present study indicates that RPVSPs contribute to an increase in daytime ambient temperatures by approximately 1.6 °C and surface temperatures by about 3.4 °C, based on simulations incorporating improved surface and urban canopy parameters derived from the University of Texas–Global Building Heights for Urban Studies (UT-GLOBUS) dataset. These findings are consistent with our earlier study conducted without improved surface and urban canopy parameters, which reported that RPVSPs contributed to an increase in daytime ambient temperatures by approximately 1.5 °C and surface temperatures by around 3.2 °C. The results of this study further suggest that this increase in RPVSP-induced urban temperature can lead to a rise in extreme heat stress exposure, with 44.1 % of daytime hours classified as extreme heat stress (UTCI > 46 °C) for buildings with RPVSPs, compared to 18.5 % for non-RPVSP buildings at city scale. However, these panels also yield a decrease in extreme heat hours at night from 23.4 % to 19.1 %, indicating potential improvements in nighttime thermal comfort. The analysis of cooling degree hours (CDH) showed a 9.71 % increase in maximum daytime CDH, indicating a rise in cooling demand from 200.5 h to 220.6 h in Kolkata city where all buildings were considered equipped with RPVSPs. Nevertheless, a decrease of 7.70 % in maximum nighttime CDH, dropping from 130 h to 120 h, highlights the panels’ capacity to reduce heat retention during cooler hours. Additionally, this study also quantifies the dual role of RPVSPs in mitigating and amplifying thermal stress during Kolkata’s heatwaves. While daytime air conditioning (AC) energy demand averages 25.86 Wm−2, RPVSPs generate 17.61 Wm−2 covering 68.1 % of the cooling load. However, nighttime output drops to zero, despite a sustained demand of 19.4 Wm−2. Overall, RPVSPs meet only 48.1 % of daily AC energy demand, with just 20–25 % coverage in dense, high-rise areas but up to 80 % in low-density zones. This study distinctively elucidates the dual role of RPVSPs in urban thermal dynamics, revealing how they can both exacerbate daytime heat stress while enhancing nighttime comfort. The findings reveal the need for adaptive urban planning that effectively integrates renewable energy solutions with strategies to mitigate urban heat.

Abstract Image

量化由于在全市范围内安装屋顶光伏太阳能电池板而产生的室外热应力潜力
在人口稠密的地区,城市炎热正变得越来越严重,特别是在热带气候地区,那里的夏季平均气温经常达到700摄氏度。34°c [307.15 k]。随着城市寻求可持续能源解决方案,屋顶光伏太阳能电池板(rpvsp)因其可再生能源潜力而受到欢迎。然而,RPVSPs对城市热应激的小气候影响仍未得到充分的了解。本研究首次系统地研究了rpvsp引起的热应激,并对印度加尔各答的城市尺度进行了分析,重点研究了其对热舒适和城市小气候的影响,从而解决了一个关键的研究空白。我们利用城市尺度的通用热舒适指数(UTCI)和热指数(HI),对安装了rpvsp和未安装rpvsp的建筑进行了比较,分析了关键气象参数和热应力指标的变化。目前的研究表明,基于来自德克萨斯大学全球城市建筑高度研究(UT-GLOBUS)数据集的改进的地表和城市冠层参数的模拟,rpvsp导致白天环境温度升高约1.6°C,地表温度升高约3.4°C。这些发现与我们之前在没有改善地表和城市冠层参数的情况下进行的研究一致,该研究报告称,RPVSPs导致白天环境温度升高约1.5°C,地表温度升高约3.2°C。这项研究的结果进一步表明,rpvsp引起的城市温度的增加可能导致极端热应激暴露的增加,其中44.1%的白天时间被归类为极端热应激(UTCI >;46°C),而在城市尺度上,非rpvsp建筑的温度为18.5%。然而,这些面板也使夜间极端高温时间从23.4%减少到19.1%,表明夜间热舒适的潜在改善。对冷却度小时(CDH)的分析显示,白天最大CDH增加了9.71%,表明加尔各答市的冷却需求从200.5小时增加到220.6小时,所有建筑物都被认为配备了rpvsp。然而,最大夜间CDH下降了7.70%,从130小时下降到120小时,突出了面板在较冷时段减少蓄热的能力。此外,本研究还量化了rpvsp在加尔各答热浪期间减轻和放大热应力的双重作用。白天空调(AC)的能量需求平均为25.86 Wm−2,而rpvsp产生17.61 Wm−2,覆盖68.1%的冷负荷。然而,尽管持续需求19.4 Wm−2,夜间输出降至零。总的来说,rpvsp只能满足48.1%的日常交流能源需求,在密集的高层地区只有20 - 25%的覆盖率,而在低密度地区则高达80%。本研究独特地阐明了rpvsp在城市热动力学中的双重作用,揭示了它们如何在加剧白天热应激的同时提高夜间舒适度。研究结果表明,需要进行适应性城市规划,有效地将可再生能源解决方案与缓解城市热量的策略相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信