Admission glucose is a significant outcome predictor in anterior circulation stroke: approaching the sweet spot.

IF 3.2 Q2 Medicine
Alexandra Filipov, Martin Andermann, Guilherme Lepski, Analía Arévalo, Tim Hilgenfeld, Silvia Schönenberger, Christoph Gumbinger, Markus Möhlenbruch, Peter Arthur Ringleb, Jessica Jesser
{"title":"Admission glucose is a significant outcome predictor in anterior circulation stroke: approaching the sweet spot.","authors":"Alexandra Filipov, Martin Andermann, Guilherme Lepski, Analía Arévalo, Tim Hilgenfeld, Silvia Schönenberger, Christoph Gumbinger, Markus Möhlenbruch, Peter Arthur Ringleb, Jessica Jesser","doi":"10.1186/s42466-025-00393-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Admission glycemia has emerged as an important outcome predictor in the context of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusions (LVO) in ischemic stroke. However, a clinically relevant threshold of glucose levels to identify patients at risk for poor functional outcome has yet to be established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, monocentric, consecutive registry-based analysis of patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO. Good outcome was defined as functional independence after 90 days (90d mRS < 3) or no deterioration from premorbid mRS. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to assess the association between admission glucose levels and functional outcome, including for well-established outcome predictors, i.e. age, NIHSS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), time to reperfusion, unsuccessful recanalization, presence of bleeding, and diabetes. In addition, we conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal admission glucose threshold that best discriminates patients at risk for poor outcome, maximizing sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 509 patients (mean age = 74.3 ± 12.6 years, median previous mRS = 1.5, 48% male). 194 patients (38.1%) had good outcome and 315 (61.9%) had poor outcome. According to the logistic regression admission glucose (p = 0.012, OR 1.009 95% CI [1.002 1.016]) contributed to predicting poor outcome, while known diabetes did not show a significant contribution. The ROC analysis revealed an admission glucose of 117 mg/dL (59.7% sensitivity; 58% specificity) to be the optimal cut-off value to discriminate patients at risk for poor outcome with an OR of 2.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Admission hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of poor outcome after MT for LVO in the anterior circulation. We hypothesize, that optimal glucose values in patients undergoing MT will likely be in the low normoglycemic range. Prospective controlled studies with targeted glucose values will be needed for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-025-00393-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Admission glycemia has emerged as an important outcome predictor in the context of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusions (LVO) in ischemic stroke. However, a clinically relevant threshold of glucose levels to identify patients at risk for poor functional outcome has yet to be established.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, monocentric, consecutive registry-based analysis of patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO. Good outcome was defined as functional independence after 90 days (90d mRS < 3) or no deterioration from premorbid mRS. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to assess the association between admission glucose levels and functional outcome, including for well-established outcome predictors, i.e. age, NIHSS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), time to reperfusion, unsuccessful recanalization, presence of bleeding, and diabetes. In addition, we conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal admission glucose threshold that best discriminates patients at risk for poor outcome, maximizing sensitivity and specificity.

Results: We analyzed 509 patients (mean age = 74.3 ± 12.6 years, median previous mRS = 1.5, 48% male). 194 patients (38.1%) had good outcome and 315 (61.9%) had poor outcome. According to the logistic regression admission glucose (p = 0.012, OR 1.009 95% CI [1.002 1.016]) contributed to predicting poor outcome, while known diabetes did not show a significant contribution. The ROC analysis revealed an admission glucose of 117 mg/dL (59.7% sensitivity; 58% specificity) to be the optimal cut-off value to discriminate patients at risk for poor outcome with an OR of 2.3.

Conclusion: Admission hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of poor outcome after MT for LVO in the anterior circulation. We hypothesize, that optimal glucose values in patients undergoing MT will likely be in the low normoglycemic range. Prospective controlled studies with targeted glucose values will be needed for validation.

入院血糖是前循环卒中的重要预后预测指标:接近最佳点。
背景:在缺血性卒中大血管闭塞(LVO)机械取栓(MT)的情况下,入院血糖已成为一个重要的预后预测指标。然而,临床相关的血糖水平阈值尚未确定,以确定有不良功能预后风险的患者。方法:我们对接受MT治疗前循环LVO的患者进行了回顾性、单中心、连续登记分析。结果:我们分析了509例患者(平均年龄= 74.3±12.6岁,既往mRS中位数= 1.5,48%为男性)。194例(38.1%)预后良好,315例(61.9%)预后不良。根据logistic回归,入院血糖(p = 0.012, OR 1.009 95% CI[1.002 1.016])有助于预测不良预后,而已知糖尿病没有显着贡献。ROC分析显示入院血糖为117 mg/dL(59.7%敏感性;58%特异性)作为区分预后不良风险患者的最佳临界值,OR为2.3。结论:入院时高血糖是前循环LVO MT术后预后不良的独立预测因子。我们假设,接受MT的患者的最佳血糖值可能在低的正常血糖范围内。需要有目标血糖值的前瞻性对照研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信