Parents Plus Systemic, Solution-Focused Parent Training Programs: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1111/famp.70049
Claire O'Dwyer, Conal Twomey, Brid Davis, John Sharry, Eileen Brosnan, Alan Carr
{"title":"Parents Plus Systemic, Solution-Focused Parent Training Programs: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Claire O'Dwyer,&nbsp;Conal Twomey,&nbsp;Brid Davis,&nbsp;John Sharry,&nbsp;Eileen Brosnan,&nbsp;Alan Carr","doi":"10.1111/famp.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review and meta-analysis of Parent Plus (PP) Program evaluation studies aimed to update a previous meta-analysis published in 2017. PP programs are systemic, solution-focused, group-based parent training interventions for the prevention and treatment of a range of child and adolescent problems. Controlled or uncontrolled, randomized or non-randomized trials involving at least 10 cases which evaluated PP programs were included in the review. PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases were searched from January 2016 to January 2014. Risk of bias was evaluated with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. Since the last meta-analysis, the pool of PP studies has increased by 25%. This updated meta-analysis included 21 studies involving 1179 families. In controlled trials, there were significant between-group, post-intervention effect sizes for child behavior (<i>g</i> = 0.42 [0.25, 0.59], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 13), goal attainment (<i>g</i> = 1.22 [0.83, 1.60], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 9), parental satisfaction (<i>g</i> = 0.67 [0.36, 0.98], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>k</i> = 8) and parental stress (<i>g</i> = 0.45 [0.20, 0.71], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01, <i>k</i> = 10) favoring PP programs. The main limitation of the review was the risk of bias in the primary studies reviewed. This updated meta-analysis shows that PP programs are evidence-based, systemic interventions that may lead to positive outcomes for families of children with emotional and behavioral problems, post-divorce adjustment difficulties, intellectual disability, ADHD, and at risk of obesity.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> PROSPERO: CRD42024504594</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/famp.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis of Parent Plus (PP) Program evaluation studies aimed to update a previous meta-analysis published in 2017. PP programs are systemic, solution-focused, group-based parent training interventions for the prevention and treatment of a range of child and adolescent problems. Controlled or uncontrolled, randomized or non-randomized trials involving at least 10 cases which evaluated PP programs were included in the review. PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and ERIC databases were searched from January 2016 to January 2014. Risk of bias was evaluated with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. Since the last meta-analysis, the pool of PP studies has increased by 25%. This updated meta-analysis included 21 studies involving 1179 families. In controlled trials, there were significant between-group, post-intervention effect sizes for child behavior (g = 0.42 [0.25, 0.59], p < 0.001, k = 13), goal attainment (g = 1.22 [0.83, 1.60], p < 0.001, k = 9), parental satisfaction (g = 0.67 [0.36, 0.98], p < 0.001, k = 8) and parental stress (g = 0.45 [0.20, 0.71], p < 0.01, k = 10) favoring PP programs. The main limitation of the review was the risk of bias in the primary studies reviewed. This updated meta-analysis shows that PP programs are evidence-based, systemic interventions that may lead to positive outcomes for families of children with emotional and behavioral problems, post-divorce adjustment difficulties, intellectual disability, ADHD, and at risk of obesity.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024504594

Abstract Image

父母加上系统的,以解决方案为重点的父母培训计划:更新的系统回顾和元分析
本研究系统回顾和荟萃分析了Parent Plus (PP)项目评估研究,旨在更新2017年发表的一项荟萃分析。PP项目是系统的、以解决方案为重点的、以团体为基础的家长培训干预措施,用于预防和治疗一系列儿童和青少年问题。本综述纳入了至少10例评估PP方案的对照或非对照、随机或非随机试验。检索PsycINFO、PubMed、CINAHL和ERIC数据库,检索时间为2016年1月至2014年1月。采用RoB2和ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。自上次荟萃分析以来,PP研究的数量增加了25%。这项更新的荟萃分析包括21项研究,涉及1179个家庭。在对照试验中,儿童行为(g = 0.42 [0.25, 0.59], p < 0.001, k = 13)、目标实现(g = 1.22 [0.83, 1.60], p < 0.001, k = 9)、父母满意度(g = 0.67 [0.36, 0.98], p < 0.001, k = 8)和父母压力(g = 0.45 [0.20, 0.71], p < 0.01, k = 10)的干预后组间效应显著。本综述的主要局限性是所综述的主要研究存在偏倚风险。这一最新的荟萃分析表明,PP项目是基于证据的系统性干预措施,可能会为有情绪和行为问题、离婚后适应困难、智力残疾、多动症和肥胖风险的儿童的家庭带来积极的结果。试验注册:PROSPERO: CRD42024504594
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信