Mental health and physical distancing in the context of "living with COVID" in the United Kingdom: Comparing the general population and people with disabilities.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1037/hea0001520
Tarandeep Singh Kang, Joseph T F Lau, Yanqiu Yu, Friederike Schlaghecken, Robin Goodwin
{"title":"Mental health and physical distancing in the context of \"living with COVID\" in the United Kingdom: Comparing the general population and people with disabilities.","authors":"Tarandeep Singh Kang, Joseph T F Lau, Yanqiu Yu, Friederike Schlaghecken, Robin Goodwin","doi":"10.1037/hea0001520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic revealed substantial differences in engagement with recommended protective behaviors and mental health between individuals with and without disabilities. We compare mental health and physical distancing among people with disabilities and the general population in the context of the U.K. policy of \"living with the virus.\"</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected via online questionnaire from July 4 to July 7, 2022 (<i>N</i> = 1,445, of which 590 people with disabilities). We measured anxiety and depression symptoms, engagement with physical distancing, tendency to avoid social gatherings, with additional measures from the theories of conservation resources, health beliefs, and protection motivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with disabilities perceived themselves to be lower in social support and self-efficacy than individuals without disabilities. People with disabilities also reported less coronavirus-specific distress and less belief in the efficacy of physical distancing as a preventative measure. People with disabilities were more likely to show symptoms of depression and more likely to avoid social gatherings than members of the U.K. general population without disabilities. People with disabilities were, however, likely to consider themselves more resilient than individuals without disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with disabilities report greater depression, even 2 years into the pandemic, and were more likely to avoid social interactions with others. This study suggests it is important not to give up vigilance against the virus, and to pay special attention to the mental health and welfare of vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1074-1083"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic revealed substantial differences in engagement with recommended protective behaviors and mental health between individuals with and without disabilities. We compare mental health and physical distancing among people with disabilities and the general population in the context of the U.K. policy of "living with the virus."

Method: Data were collected via online questionnaire from July 4 to July 7, 2022 (N = 1,445, of which 590 people with disabilities). We measured anxiety and depression symptoms, engagement with physical distancing, tendency to avoid social gatherings, with additional measures from the theories of conservation resources, health beliefs, and protection motivation.

Results: People with disabilities perceived themselves to be lower in social support and self-efficacy than individuals without disabilities. People with disabilities also reported less coronavirus-specific distress and less belief in the efficacy of physical distancing as a preventative measure. People with disabilities were more likely to show symptoms of depression and more likely to avoid social gatherings than members of the U.K. general population without disabilities. People with disabilities were, however, likely to consider themselves more resilient than individuals without disabilities.

Conclusions: People with disabilities report greater depression, even 2 years into the pandemic, and were more likely to avoid social interactions with others. This study suggests it is important not to give up vigilance against the virus, and to pay special attention to the mental health and welfare of vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

英国“与COVID共存”背景下的心理健康和身体距离:比较普通人群和残疾人
目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行表明,残疾人和非残疾人在遵守建议的保护行为和心理健康方面存在重大差异。我们在英国“与病毒共存”政策的背景下,比较了残疾人和普通人群的心理健康和身体距离。方法:于2022年7月4日至7月7日通过在线问卷收集数据(N = 1445人,其中残疾人590人)。我们测量了焦虑和抑郁症状、保持身体距离、避免社交聚会的倾向,以及来自保护资源理论、健康信念和保护动机的额外措施。结果:残障人士的社会支持感和自我效能感均低于非残障人士。残疾人还报告说,他们对冠状病毒特有的痛苦较少,也不太相信保持身体距离作为一种预防措施的有效性。与英国普通人群相比,残疾人更有可能表现出抑郁症状,更有可能避免社交聚会。然而,残疾人可能认为自己比正常人更有弹性。结论:残疾人报告更严重的抑郁,甚至在大流行2年后,并且更有可能避免与他人进行社交互动。这项研究表明,重要的是不要放弃对病毒的警惕,并特别关注包括残疾人在内的弱势群体的心理健康和福利。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信