Comparative Evaluation of Blue Phantom and SCOBY-Based Models for Ultrasound-Guided Intravenous Cannulation Training.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jarred P Williams, Melita Macdonald, Peter A Watts, Brad F Peckler
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Blue Phantom and SCOBY-Based Models for Ultrasound-Guided Intravenous Cannulation Training.","authors":"Jarred P Williams, Melita Macdonald, Peter A Watts, Brad F Peckler","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound-guided intravenous (USIV) cannulation is a common alternative when IV access cannot otherwise be obtained. Many hospitals teach this skill with the commercial CAE Blue Phantom gelatinous training blocks. However, their cost is a barrier. This has led to experimentation with creative alternatives. Recent studies have trialed SCOBY (Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast) in the production of training models for medical procedures. SCOBY is a biofilm-like structure appearing as a thick, rubbery film. We aimed to develop a 2-vessel SCOBY-based model and compare its effectiveness for teaching USIV against the Phantom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants, 23 emergency medicine clinicians, performed USIV on each model and completed a pre- and post-procedure questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four percent of participants indicated that the SCOBY model more closely resembled the clinical reality of human tissue compared with 13% for the Phantom. SCOBY provided an improved visual appearance, physical touch, feel of the procedure, and appearance of \"subdermal tissues\" on ultrasound compared to the Phantom.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest a promising future for SCOBY as a cost-effective alternative to teaching clinical skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided intravenous (USIV) cannulation is a common alternative when IV access cannot otherwise be obtained. Many hospitals teach this skill with the commercial CAE Blue Phantom gelatinous training blocks. However, their cost is a barrier. This has led to experimentation with creative alternatives. Recent studies have trialed SCOBY (Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast) in the production of training models for medical procedures. SCOBY is a biofilm-like structure appearing as a thick, rubbery film. We aimed to develop a 2-vessel SCOBY-based model and compare its effectiveness for teaching USIV against the Phantom.

Methods: Participants, 23 emergency medicine clinicians, performed USIV on each model and completed a pre- and post-procedure questionnaire.

Results: Seventy-four percent of participants indicated that the SCOBY model more closely resembled the clinical reality of human tissue compared with 13% for the Phantom. SCOBY provided an improved visual appearance, physical touch, feel of the procedure, and appearance of "subdermal tissues" on ultrasound compared to the Phantom.

Conclusion: These results suggest a promising future for SCOBY as a cost-effective alternative to teaching clinical skills.

超声引导静脉置管训练中蓝幻影与scoby模型的比较评价。
导读:超声引导静脉(USIV)插管是一种常见的选择,当静脉访问不能以其他方式获得。许多医院用商用CAE Blue Phantom凝胶训练块教授这项技能。然而,它们的成本是一个障碍。这导致了创造性替代方案的试验。最近的研究已经试验了SCOBY(细菌和酵母的共生培养)在医疗程序训练模型的生产。SCOBY是一种类似生物膜的结构,看起来像一层厚厚的橡胶膜。我们的目标是开发一个基于scoby的2船模型,并比较其与Phantom的教学USIV的有效性。方法:23名急诊临床医生对每个模型进行USIV测试,并完成术前和术后问卷调查。结果:74%的参与者表示SCOBY模型更接近临床真实的人体组织,而幻影模型只有13%。与Phantom相比,SCOBY提供了更好的视觉外观、物理触感、手术感觉和超声“皮下组织”外观。结论:这些结果表明,SCOBY作为一种具有成本效益的替代临床技能教学方法具有广阔的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信